There is no question but that the revolutionary Left has triumphed in a way that many of us never dreamed possible. What we didn’t realize is that while our conservative principles were being undermined by misguided Republicans in the White House and Congress, the Left had lost none of its intention of imposing on America its radical socialist agenda.
The senseless and horrific killings in Tucson on January 9 by a demented young man have diverted the nation's attention from the positive changes taking place in Washington and focused it on liberals clamoring to muzzle conservative talk shows. Even the sheriff in Pima County used this tragic occasion to accuse Rush Limbaugh of aiding and abetting the killer, whose friend told a reporter that the killer did not listen to talk radio. Indeed, the massacre gave the liberals a golden opportunity to once more lash out against conservatives and call for silencing their programs. Sarah Palin referred to the attacks on her as "blood liable."
You would think that teaching a child to read would be as easy as A-B-C. But not in today’s public schools where reading failure is epidemic. And that’s because the teaching methods, devised by the Progressives, were designed to dumb-down the American people. The result is that a large number of Americans are unable to perform the jobs demanded by our high-tech economy.
President Barack Obama went to Tucson on January 12th to take part in the memorial service held at the University of Arizona at Tucson to express the nation’s solidarity with the citizens of Tucson and Arizona in paying tribute to the dead and wounded of Saturday’s massacre.
Charlotte Iserbyt has put her great exposé of the dumbing-down agenda of American education on the Internet, so that anyone can now read it and download it free of charge. The Deliberate Dumbing Down of America is a big book and so very important that anyone interested in the future of this country must read it. I wrote a Foreword for the book that basically explains what Charlotte achieved by her incredible research based on documents she took out of the files of the Department of Education in Washington, where she worked as a Senior Policy Advisor in the Office of Educational Research and Improvement (OERI) during the first Reagan administration. She is the consummate whistleblower, with an overwhelming sense of responsibility as a public servant and a parent. Here’s the essence of what I wrote:
It is quite appropriate at this time to remind Americans of what the son of Saul Alinsky (left) wrote about Barack Obama back in August 2008 when he received the Democratic nomination for the presidency. It should help explain why Obama acted in such a hostile, ill-mannered way toward Republican Paul Ryan and his plan to reduce the federal debt. As an Alinsky disciple, Obama learned to behave in a manner befitting a socialist revolutionary confronting the pro-capitalist enemy. Obama�s scathing attack was a brilliant Alinsky event.
In a way, the history of National Public Radio, now known simply as NPR, follows the slow, incremental creep of America toward socialism. Its very existence, in fact, serves as a milestone along the socialist path, since it was created by an act of government — the Public Broadcasting Act of 1967. The legislation was signed into law by President Lyndon B. Johnson, the liberal Democrat who beat conservative Republican Barry Goldwater in a crucial presidential race in 1964.
[Edited by J]
President Barack Obama went to Tucson on January 12 to take part in the memorial service held at the University of Arizona at Tucson to express the nation’s solidarity with the citizens of Tucson and Arizona in paying tribute to the dead and wounded of Saturday’s massacre.
For 30 minutes he spoke of the lives that had been lost and injured by the dark work of a madman. He quoted the Book of Job in expressing our inability to understand the mind of the killer. He spoke about each of the victims, describing their lives in ways that moved the audience. But the gist of his message was that the senseless murder of 9-year-old Christine Green — who was born on September 11, 2001 — should cause us to strive to make America the ideal kind of country that she would have expected it to be.
While Obama addressed the need to have a more civil discourse among those who disagree, he avoided getting involved in the blame game which so many of his liberal colleagues have engaged in. “The hope of the nation is here tonight,” he declared. It was a good speech that pulled at the heartstrings of the people of Tucson. And it was quite presidential in the traditional meaning of the word. He spoke for the entire country, not as a polarizing liberal. “We should strive to become better people,” he emphasized.
The service was opened by a University of Arizona professor of Indian descent, who provided a traditional Native American blessing. He has a son serving in Afghanistan. Next came the playing of the National Anthem. The president of the university then spoke of Tucson and wondered how this horrible event could have happened in such a caring community. But despite these tragic events, Tucson showed its unity in this memorial service. He then introduced Daniel Hernandez, Jr., Gabrielle Giffords’ young intern, who saved her life. He gave a short and eloquent speech on the need to come together as Americans.
Next came the Governor of Arizona, Jan Brewer. She thanked the President for coming, and then spoke of those who had been killed, and what their loss meant to Arizona. She emphasized that one man’s act of darkness could not destroy the caring spirit of Arizonans. Next on the podium was Secretary of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano, former Governor of Arizona, who read from the Book of Isaiah. Attorney General Eric Holder followed, reading from the New Testament, the second letter of the Apostle Paul to the Corinthians, in which the name of Jesus is mentioned. But the main event was the speech of the President, which was interrupted many times with applause.
Earlier in the day former Governor of Alaska Sarah Palin released a video in response to the attempts by liberals to blame her for the actions of an evil, apolitical madman. She characterized such accusations as “blood liable,” a term used in superstitious Russia when Jews were accused of killing Christian children to use their blood for sacrificial purposes. Alan Dershowitz, the Jewish law professor, commented that the use of the term by Palin was quite appropriate.
Palin also stressed that debate and political disagreement were part of the American democratic process and that the actions of an evil madman were not going to stop the American people from exercising their normal right to disagree with their government’s policies. She pointed out that the changes made in Congress by the elections in November proved that the ballot box was the proper way to change government policies.
As the days go by, more and more information about the killer is coming to light. Apparently he was well known to the Sheriff of Pima County and law enforcement agencies. That they were unable to prevent him from committing this massacre is an indication that the government cannot protect us from the deeds of evil men.
The only person who seems to be rejoicing in what took place on Saturday, January 9 is the killer himself, whose ugly, smiling, bald-headed mug shot seems to say in defiance, “I did it and I’m happy that I did it.” He ought to be found guilty of murder and given the death sentence. There is no reason to keep someone so evil alive in a prison at taxpayers' expense.
All in all, this memorial service will become part and parcel of the American political canon, and will probably be used in classrooms as an example of presidential eloquence and thoughtfulness.
For many years, I kept track of the SAT scores for my publication, The Blumenfeld Education Letter, as an indicator of the decline of literacy in America and the continued dumbing down of Americans. And since there has been no implementation of intensive phonics in our schools, I have not expected the SAT verbal scores to improve. And apparently, I’ve been right.
The recent events in Wisconsin, in which unionized teachers behaved like third-world mobs, is a stark reminder of what a grave mistake it was to permit government employees to unionize. Since government employees have always had job security and benefits that many workers in the private sector couldn’t dream of getting, there was no need for them to unionize unless they wanted to use union power to intimidate legislators and extort more money from the taxpayers.