You are here: HomeEconomy
Tuesday, 10 September 2013 15:55

Warren Buffett’s Railroad Tests Natural Gas to Drive Its Locomotives

Written by 

The quiet revolution going on in the energy sector as a result of fracking is being punctuated by changes unseen and unappreciated, such as the recent announcement by Warren Buffett’s railroad, BNSF Railway. The largest railroad in the country, BNSF is testing the use of liquefied natural gas (LNG) to drive the company’s locomotives, which currently use more diesel fuel than any other entity except the U.S. Navy.

In the announcement, BNSF chairman Matthew Rose called the change “transformational:”

The use of liquefied natural gas as an alternative fuel is a potential transformational change for our railroad and for our industry.

This pilot project is an important first step … [in] potentially reducing fuel costs and greenhouse gas emissions.

As the price of natural gas has fallen compared to the price of oil, the economic math is increasingly persuasive. At the current price for one million BTUs of natural gas, it would cost companies such as BNSF less than $20 for the energy equivalent in a barrel of oil costing $110. The explosion in natural gas in the United States has reduced the “landed price” of natural gas to one quarter of its price in the U.K., and one fifth of its cost elsewhere in the world. In the real world where BNSF operates, diesel fuel costs the company nearly $4 per gallon compared to just over $2 per gallon for large LNG users — a potential savings of 50 percent.

This is driving the BNSF test, according to Rose: "The changed market for natural gas in the United States is a critical part of our decision to explore it as a locomotive fuel."

BNSF isn't the first energy-dependent company to do the math, either. Waste Management (WM) has already started converting its fleet of 18,000 diesel trucks to LNG and expects to have the change-over completed soon. Said WM’s CEO David Steiner:

This conversion makes good business sense for our company and our shareholders because of the significant maintenance and diesel fuel cost savings. It’s much cleaner for the environment and our LNG trucks are much quieter.

Also doing the math is LA Metro, the public transportation system that serves Los Angeles. LA Metro, with the most LNG buses in the country — some 2,200 — estimates its fleet has already driven more than one billion miles on natural gas and has cut the release of particulates by 80 percent and greenhouse gases by 300,000 pounds every day. In addition, it has cut its fuel costs by between 10 and 20 percent.

This is just the beginning, according to the international energy consultant firm IHS. In its recently released study America’s New Energy Future, IHS says that the increases in natural-gas supplies and resultant lowering of energy costs have already increased household incomes, boosted international trade, and raised American competitiveness. In 2012 alone, according to IHS, the average family saved $1,200 in lower energy bills and lower costs for all other goods and services. That figure is expected to continue to rise as energy costs decline, with savings approaching $2,000 by 2015 and $3,500 by the year 2025.

In addition, there are other benefits as well, including the much-reduced dependency upon foreign sources of energy. And for companies competing internationally, lower operating costs through the use of LNG are driving their competitive advantage. As domestic energy production replaces foreign energy sources, America’s trade advantage will continue to improve as well.

At present, this “unconventional” energy industry supports, directly or indirectly, more than two million jobs, which number is expected to double by 2025, according to the study. As Daniel Yergin, IHS vice chairman, noted:

The unconventional oil and gas revolution is not only an energy story. It is also a very big economic story that flows throughout the U.S. economy….

In addition to significant job and economic impacts … the growth of long-term, low-cost energy supplies is benefiting households and helping to revitalize U.S. manufacturing, creating a competitive advantage for U.S. industry and for the United States itself.

This statement by Yergin understates the coming tidal wave of benefits that will be flowing outward as the country continues its quest to become energy self-sufficient. IHS expects a third of a trillion dollars of new capital to flow into the energy sector in the next 10 years, resulting in further reductions in energy costs and household expenses.

Nothing was said in the study, however, of the impact of lower energy costs on powering the one essential necessary for a world-wide improvement in living standards: information. As the cost of information continues its already rapid decline, living standards around the world will improve greatly. In his members-only newsletter, Gary North pointed out that predictions of how life will look for the next generation will turn out to be far too conservative:

How will the economy look if the cost of its major single component, information, continues to fall at a rate of 50% every twelve months? [George] Gilder [author of Knowledge and Power] believes that we are coming into an age of extreme prosperity.

If we can solve the problem of energy … Gilder’s prediction is correct.

If we can solve the energy problem, we can solve the poverty problem. Within a generation, life-threatening poverty will come to an end.

The quiet revolution going on in the energy industry, if allowed to proceed without government interference, has the potential not only of improving standards of living in the United States and around the world, but in addition of ending the scourge of poverty that has plagued mankind since creation. That’s the real revolution taking place in the energy business. 

 

A graduate of Cornell University and a former investment advisor, Bob is a regular contributor to The New American magazine and blogs frequently at www.LightFromTheRight.com, primarily on economics and politics. He can be reached at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

3 comments

  • Comment Link Randi Wright Wednesday, 13 November 2013 23:02 posted by Randi Wright

    Oil and gas costs have been decreasing, as have natural gas costs, but a number of people have noticed that electricity costs haven't gone down with them. They also aren't likely to, as the factors in setting electricity charges are a bit more complex. Article resource: shouldn't you check out some of https://personalmoneynetwork.com?

  • Comment Link REMant Friday, 13 September 2013 20:36 posted by REMant

    Fracking also increases the amount of methane in the atmosphere. But it is just as absurd to talk about abolishing poverty by increasing productivity as by transfer payments. The issue isn't the absolute level of wealth and income alone or its distribution, but the two together. And the way to do it is to put this country back on a sound monetary and fiscal basis.

  • Comment Link Frank M. Pelteson Wednesday, 11 September 2013 16:24 posted by Frank M. Pelteson

    LNG has to be stored in pressurized insulated gas tanks,with the hazard of explosions. Also the lower BTU per pound has to be considered. Its energy density is only about 60 percent of diesel oil fuel. Plus it has to be cooled to liquefy it. Shipping LNG to fueling sites is tricky unlike that of diesel oil. It is not all wine and roses.

Log in
Sign up for The New American daily highlights