Sunday, 10 March 2013 16:00

Friday’s Surprisingly Strong Jobs Numbers Aren’t Real

Written by 

At first blush the jobs report released by the Bureau of Labor Statistics on Friday looked pretty good, catching establishment economists off-guard by about 80,000 new jobs. Instead of the 160,000 new jobs expected in February, the BLS reported 236,000, which pushed down the unemployment rate to 7.7 percent. This came on top of a drop in claims for unemployment insurance as well, with the four-week moving average of 348,750 new claims declining to the lowest level since March 2008.

Some saw the numbers as exposing as overwrought claims by President Obama and Fed Chairman Bernanke that the sequester cuts would cost the economy some 750,000 jobs. John Crudele, writing in the New York Post, considered these happy numbers as a “blow to the area below Obama’s gut. It’s hard to rev up fear in people about the job market when they've just heard that things may be getting better.”

Not so fast. Though the administration has deceptively fanned the flames of fear regarding the sequester cuts, it must also be kept in mind that the job numbers now in the news do not tell the whole story.

First of all, reports early in the new year are usually fairly robust. In January and February 2012 the BLS reported nearly 600,000 new jobs, but then the economy stalled, with growth in GDP essentially flat-lining in the last quarter of the year.

According to the household survey, where the BLS asks how many are working in a household, 170,000 new jobs were added in February of this year — despite the addition of an astounding 446,000 part-time jobs. What this means is that some 276,000 full-time jobs were lost in February. A Gallup survey released the day before the Labor Department’s report noted:

Although fewer people are unemployed now than a year ago, they are not migrating to full-time jobs for an employer. In fact, fewer Americans are working full-time for an employer than were doing so a year ago, and more Americans are working part time.

This may be an effect of the ObamaCare rule that employees working 30 hours a week or more must be covered with health insurance, and as a result of that more and more employers are cutting hours and hiring more part-time people. And as hours are cut, more and more people are seeking a second job to make up the difference. That would be another of those “unintended consequences” of government interference in the marketplace.

An editorial in the New York Times successfully saw past the rosy surface numbers reported on Friday as well. It looked around at where job growth might come from. Housing? Some growth there, from a percentage basis. But when one is at the bottom, everything looks up from there. Car sales? Not so much. Rising wages? Not much help there either.

The Times also noted that the labor force is shrinking, so that whatever numbers the BLS reports aren't real:

Most of the decline [in unemployment] reflects a shrinking labor force rather than new hiring. In fact, if hiring were more robust, the unemployment rate would hold steady or even rise as the estimated four million Americans who are not working or looking for work rejoined the ranks of job seekers, where they would be counted in the official unemployment rate.

Furthermore, those who have been out of work for six months or more actually increased last month. If the economy were healthy, surely that number would be declining.

Even if one could believe that the unemployment report from Friday was accurate, it still falls below the estimated 250,000 jobs needed every month just to absorb new job seekers. It would take many more than that to bring the unemployment rate down significantly, and that just isn't on the horizon.

Until the debate about how to grow the economy changes significantly in Washington from “how do we grow jobs?” to “how do we get out of the way of jobs growth?” the unemployment rate will remain high, extending the impact of the Great Recession far into the future.


A graduate of Cornell University and a former investment advisor, Bob is a regular contributor to The New American and blogs frequently at, primarily on economics and politics. He can be reached at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. .


  • Comment Link REMant Tuesday, 12 March 2013 15:11 posted by REMant

    Look guys, this is simple. Adelman has right, and the NYT has finally learned how to interpret the BLS BS. No conspiracies, just dumb ways of doing things, that unfortunately gives a handle to those wanting to boost an overvalued market.

  • Comment Link Charlotte Hill Tuesday, 12 March 2013 09:15 posted by Charlotte Hill

    To IKV - Re: Kirks comments from yesterday
    Thank you so much for embellishing my very thoughts. You are stating the many truths that I have learned over the years about our world and the dreams of the global elite for a New World Order. Anyone with 'eyes to see' and 'ears to hear' would be able to understand that by now.

    There is one thing I would like to comment on in regard to his trust in UMB. Perhaps Kirks' faith in them is because they are one of the last players still standing. However, he can rest assured that they are in no way worried about his well being. Only his money matters. A friend of ours in the investment business admitted that if he did not spin his clients "perception" about what is happening on Wall Street, he wouldn't have a job. How sad is that?

    I believe the same applies to the MSM and many newspapers who are also owned and run by the powers that be. The Ted Turners and George Soros of the world, along with the administration and congress are the Wizards behind the curtin and it is their thoughts you hear and read. I fear that true investigative reporting is a thing of the past.

  • Comment Link IKV Monday, 11 March 2013 19:30 posted by IKV

    It is you who are guilty of drinking the cool-aide rather than the readers of this periodical. Are you really holding up Germany and Denmark as bastions of freedom and free enterprise? May I remind you that after decades of failed socialist intervention into every aspect of the economy and private sector, the EU is on the brink of economic collapse? The European socialist system is the poster child for abandoning socialism altogether. Yet those like yourself continue to hold the EU up as the great beacon on a hill while the system your revere crumbles at your feet. It is a fact that the media is bias and leans decidedly towards the left. Dan Rather admitted this fact a few years ago. David Rockefeller proudly admitted in his autobiographical memoirs that he is a globalist and worked to bring about a global government while holding political office as a US senator,an offence worthy of the charge of treason. Of course, he passionately denied this fact while in office. He lied.
    Frankly Kirk, you do not know the nature or character of the readers of this periodical. Many of us are not Republicans, having seen long ago that there is not a dime’s worth of difference between the two parties. Many of us have dedicated considerable time to political research and understanding of national and global politics. We study history not just current events as regurgitated to us by the national media. We are highly informed and we are not afraid to research the opposing point of view.
    Really, a good socialist like you is going to take UBS and Wall Street’s word on an improving economy? Again, may I remind you, these two entities received massive bailouts from the Fed, UBS to cover the credit default swaps that they were drowning in after the 2008 crash. We all know Wall Street plays the Craps table regardless of who is in power. Their goal is to make money and if they can convince shaky scared investors all is well and it is time jump back into the market, so much the better for them. It is all smoke and mirrors.
    The slide of the United States of America is due to the continued avalanche of government regulations, mandates and controls, the continued growth of said government and its addiction to spending. I would also like to note that international trade agreements have been detrimental as well. Where were all of you liberal union types when your fearless leader Bill Clinton pushed NAFTA through? Now we have virtually no industry and are slaves to foolish trade agreements. Free trade does not equal fair trade. Our politicians have agreed to treaties that were not in our best interest, although I must say they made the trans-national corporations and many of our politician's cronies very wealthy.
    Concerning the U.S. slipping down on the socioeconomic scale, have you ever considered perhaps it is a concerted effort on the part of our government to destroy the independent spirit and economic status of the American middleclass. If the goal is global governance (as David Rockefeller admitted), that cannot take place until there is economic parity amongst all. Is this not what your Commander in Chief means when he talks about social and economic justice? Yet you still drink your cool-aide and refuse to research what you blindly follow. Please take the time, turn off the television and do your homework. Don’t be afraid to stop being told what you are suppose to think.
    PS: Why do all progressives marginalize and name call those with opposing views? All wisdom and knowledge does not rest in your political or worldview. It is so very condescending, prideful and ignorant of you to think it does.

  • Comment Link Frank M. Pelteson Monday, 11 March 2013 10:51 posted by Frank M. Pelteson

    This article verifies the slogan of Then John Birch Society:


  • Comment Link wigglwagon Sunday, 10 March 2013 21:43 posted by wigglwagon

    America spends a BILLION dollars more every day on imported products than other countries spend on our exports. Only politicians and simpletons believe America can survive like that.

  • Comment Link Kirk Sunday, 10 March 2013 20:18 posted by Kirk

    Let me see if I understand this correctly. A site which is the right wing equivalent of Pravda, with a long history of distorting information to propagandize the indoctrinated, would like to make the point that the Obama administration and Bloomberg, and the Economist, And the Financial TImes et. al don't "realize" what is going on with the unemployment numbers? Now if I understand correctly, I am supposed to now,

    !. Complain about the "media" by using propaganda memes like "MSM" or "mainstream media"
    2. Complain about the "liberals" and their influence on "the Greatest Country on Earth"
    3. Tune out multiple Nobel Prize winning economists who say the economy is getting stronger.
    4. Pine after a right wing government who have constantly mishandled the economy
    5. Ignore my investment advice from UBS and Don't look at the DOW numbers.
    6. Generally agree that the "gubement" can not help the economy, only "Free markets" can, even though every single other industrialized country has more government involvement in their economy and the only countries who have less than the US are third world countries like Somalia.
    7. Take another sip of the Kool-aid and watch the US continue to slide vis a vis our socioeconomic peers in a line concurrent with the drop of our tax rate? Let's see, less life expectancy, higher infant mortality, dropping literacy rates, failing schools, this is your goal? You are certainly achieving them.

    Ask yourself why countries like Germany or Denmark who have far more "interference in business" have a lower unemployment rate, universal health care with strong surpluses, and a higher standard of living than the US.

  • Comment Link cj Sunday, 10 March 2013 18:47 posted by cj

    This would be one of the times when over inflated jobs numbers don't help the administration. All other times the administration loves the numbers that don't report those who have quit looking for work. Those who don't trust our president, whitehouse, house reps and senators begin to understand the truth. They lie to keep their places, accrue power and amass wealth. For the most part they are lazy, ignorant and selfish.

  • Comment Link petroff world Sunday, 10 March 2013 18:44 posted by petroff world

    We all understand that unemployment numbers don't necessarily illustrate the overall health of our nation. If readers don't understand this, they should. The Obama administration is not sitting out in a cornfield all by itself tossing out unemployment numbers to prove a point. The previous administration did the same to great effect during roughly 8 years of war and billions if not trillions given away to 200+ government contractors overseas with practically no oversight or accounting, the old nation-building shell game, all while the Bush administration, its cronies and its supporters were telling us the economy was "roaring" and "booming." Let's not forget what George W. Bush told us in his own wonderful way: feelings like trust and confidence and a positive attitude were important in sustaining a healthy economy. You can't deny the rise in consumer confidence these days. People are still spending lots of money. The constant drumbeat of gloom and doom that follows everything conservatives write these days is the reason they are so strange and isolated.

  • Comment Link Chuck eroo Sunday, 10 March 2013 18:00 posted by Chuck eroo

    Great article to show the media is twisting the truth.
    So why do they want us to believe things are getting better? It won't change the end.
    There is no fix for 17 trillion in debt.

Please Log In To Comment
Log in