Culture Headlines
- Austin, Texas Maintains Harassing Ordinance Against Pro-Life Pregnancy Centers
- Tenn. Senator Tossed From Bistro for “Anti-Gay” Views
- Komen Cancer Charity Reneges on Planned Parent Defunding
- Facing the Giants? A Snap for Danny Woodhead
- Cancel the Cookies: Grave Concerns Over Direction of Girl Scouts
- Controversial Christian General Bows out of West Point Prayer Breakfast
Some ads are provided by Google
They are not endorsed by The New American
| What? Even Charter Schools Got "F's"? | | Print | |
| Written by Beverly K. Eakman |
| Wednesday, 24 June 2009 11:30 |
|
For example, the latest finding from a study at Stanford University's Center for Research on Education Outcomes is that even "charter schools" fall short of expectations (See hyperlink to Washington Times article: "Charter schools hit, miss in new report"). Some 37 percent of charter schools even came in below their "traditional" public-school counterparts. Say what? Many "poor" families, plus parents who are simply dissatisfied with their children's education but cannot afford increasingly expensive alternatives, have been sending their children to what they thought were higher-performing charter schools. The parents aren't aware that the same constraints that are placed on public-school learning are placed on charter schools. They aren't aware that any sort of federal funding — passed through to the states and on to local education agencies — adversely affects the school environment and curriculum. It is the rules that must be followed if a school accepts federal funding (incentives and disincentives) that guides a school's curriculum. That is why schools are awash in political correctness masquerading as history ("social studies"), junk science as scientific method, and sex education as health. Tests are called "assessments," meaning they are not really tests at all, but rather opinion research with large doses of mental-health screening interspersed among self-reports and how-do-feel-when queries. Some readers may have seen a version of the following test — this one an eighth-grade final exam, circa 1895, from Salina, Kansas. The original document is on file at the Smokey Valley Genealogical Society and Library in Salina and was reprinted by the Salina Journal. A similar test served as the entrance exam for New Jersey public high schools. If a student couldn't pass these, they failed a grade, or were channeled into low-paying, menial jobs. The message was two-fold: (1) success at academics matters; and (2) education is a privilege, not a "right." Thus, the school environment was infused with strict discipline — "Yes, Ma'am" and "No, Sir" — and appropriate dress and decorum. What follows, then, is an honest-to-goodness test, not a "questionnaire," not an "assessment," not an "instrument." Notice the construction is not "multiple choice"; comprehensible sentence structure was required. Note also the first entry under Geography: "What is climate? On what does climate depend?" That alone should give our nation's education policymakers a reality check: 8TH GRADE FINAL EXAM, 1895 Grammar (1 hour) Arithmetic (1 hour, 15 minutes) Geography (1 hour) Nevertheless, the point was made: educators no longer have a clue what a real education is. As soon as "social studies" replaced history, civics, and geography, America's precipitous slide into ignorance began. Today, most graduates are oblivious to any connection between national sovereignty, the Declaration of Independence, self-evident truths, inalienable rights, liberty, private property rights, and popular sovereignty. How can they be expected to understand the Constitution? Little wonder that America is on the path to socialism in earnest, having turned out some 40 years' worth of little socialists who believe not in self-sufficiency, independent action, or self-determination, but rather in interdependency, mob action ("teamwork"), government regulation, and bean-counting. Trackback(0)
Comments (0)
![]() Write comment
This content has been locked. You can no longer post any comment.
|





After decades of hand-wringing over nonexistent or, at best, mediocre gains in student academic achievement, the most noticeable thing to come out of all the "studies" aimed at improving schools is that there is a lack of any understanding of what a "real" education looks like.

