President Barack Obama on November 4 waved $5 billion of federal grant money under the noses of state education officials to entice them to implement his ideas for reforming public schools.

The $5-billion grant fund has been titled “Race to the Top,” and the money is part of Obama’s $787-billion economic stimulus package. States must compete for the money, which Education Secretary Arne Duncan will dispense at Obama’s pleasure with no Congressional control. Only 10 to 20 states are expected to actually receive some of the grant money.

Obama promoted the competitive grants while visiting a Wisconsin middle school. He was trying to influence a November 5 vote by state legislators about linking teacher performance ratings to student test scores. This effectively links a teacher’s pay to how well his students perform, based on what's being tested. Wisconsin lawmakers are expected to lift a ban on establishing this connection, presumably so the state can qualify for some of Obama’s grant money.

The Obama administration has said that refusing to link teacher performance ratings to student test scores would lessen a state’s chance of receiving federal funds. In Wisconsin, Obama wrapped the bribe he is offering in high-sounding language about the importance of education.

“There is nothing that will determine the quality of our future as a nation or the lives our children more than the kind of education we provide them,” Obama declared. “If you’re willing to hold yourselves more accountable, if you develop a strong plan to improve the quality of education in your state, we’ll offer you a grant to help make that plan a reality.”

What the president really meant was, “If you will make your states more accountable to the federal government in the area of education, ol’ Uncle Sam will make it worth your while.” Tying teacher ratings and pay to student test scores will provide a strong incentive for teachers to prepare students to do well on standardized tests.

But standardized tests are not always as effective at measuring student knowledge as an essay test or other form of evaluation. Also, teachers of disabled, troubled, or remedial students cannot be fairly judged by the performance of their charges on standard tests. Not only that, if the federal government has any say about what is in the tests, teachers will be forced to focus on imparting what Washington wants students to know.

This kind of bribery is an unconstitutional exercise of executive branch power over the states. The Congress is supposed to have the purse strings of the federal government, not the President or his staff members. There is no authorization in the Constitution for the federal government either to take taxpayer money, to borrow money, or to simply print money and use it to bribe states into compliance with the President’s wishes.

The Associated Press admitted this when they wrote on November 4: “The administration can’t really tell states and schools what to do, since education has been largely a state and local responsibility throughout the history of the U.S. But the grants give Obama considerable leverage.”

TrackBack URI for this entry

Comments (6)

Subscribe to this comment's feed

james hurst said:

false indignation Bush bribed the american people for $300.00. That bribe got him elected president. We will let history decide whos bribe was best for the people of this country.

November 05, 2009 | url

Idiotic article, Lowly rated comment [Show]

zman said:

Idiotic Comment Young Atheart, are you arguing that throwing more federal dollars will make our children smart? More government and more federal control will not help make kids smarter, but forcing people who have no stake in education funding it is immoral theft. Just because you're brainwashed doesn't mean you have the right to do the same to my kids.

November 05, 2009

Bonnie said:

Some wisdom from Will Rogers: "The short memory of voters is what keeps our politicians in office." "We've got the best politicians that money can buy." "A fool and his money are soon elected."

November 05, 2009

Young Atheart said:

zman comment Local accountability without ANY new dollars will definitely NOT make our children smarter. My school board is using budget cut backs as an excuse to go through the motions of "no child left behind" without any real change. I can't imagine thousands of school boards independently raising educational standards in a way that would make this country more competitive. Clearly, the opposite is happening. I would hope every American would have a stake in that.

November 05, 2009

Chris Schornak said:

Who Cares? From the reading I’ve been doing on this subject (with some exceptions) the reasons kids do bad in school is because the parents don’t care enough. And for the life of me I can’t think of a solution to make a parent care. How can I make or force a parent to care about their child’s education? Of course then when the student flunks or gets bad grades, the uncaring parent (I would also add to that undereducated parent) probably blames the teacher, the school or votes for spending more money on schools, when spending more money on schools isn’t going to make that parents child any smarter.

November 15, 2009