Some ads are provided by Google

They are not endorsed by The New American

Banner
Deporting Illegal Immigrants | Print |  
Written by Roger D. McGrath   
Tuesday, 13 July 2010 00:00

joe SwingPardon me, but if I hear one more time that we can’t deport 12 million illegal aliens I’m headed for the backyard to howl at the moon. Is the American memory so short that we’ve already forgotten the 1950s? This writer is old enough to remember very clearly the mass deportation of illegal aliens that occurred in 1954 in what was officially termed “Operation Wetback” (prior to the age of political correctness).

Anyone living in Southern California then, even a kid like me, couldn’t help but take notice of the operation that sent upwards of two million illegal aliens from all across the Southwest home to Mexico. It was done swiftly and cheaply by a relatively small force, proving that arguments we hear today about such an operation being logistically impossible are nothing more than a mask concealing a lack of political will.

During World War II, with so many Americans in the service — and fighting and dying overseas — Mexicans illegally entered the United States to take advantage of employment opportunities, especially as agricultural laborers. People seem to forget that most of those who worked in the farm fields of California during the 1930s were not Mexicans but “Okies,” a term applied collectively to the hundreds of thousands of migrants who poured out of not only Oklahoma but also Texas, Arkansas, and Missouri — and smaller numbers from Kansas and Colorado — and took Route 66 to the Golden State. By 1940, the Okies constituted about 12 percent of California’s population overall, 25 percent of the population of the agricultural San Joaquin Valley, and the bulk of farm labor. Following the Japanese sneak attack on Pearl Harbor, though, the Okies began moving from the fields into the factories or the Armed Forces.

By the end of World War II, there were some two million illegal aliens living in California, Arizona, and Texas. U.S. citizens in those states began complaining that the Mexican illegals undercut the workingman’s wages, committed crimes, caused a general deterioration of the communities they lived in, gave birth to children at county expense, and sent older children to local schools — crowding classrooms and breaking school district budgets. It took years for the complaints of U.S. citizens to gain any traction.

There was already an unholy alliance of agribusiness and other employers of unskilled labor and Congressmen. Corporate farmers and other business interests argued that the work performed by illegal aliens was desperately needed. However, several studies, including one conducted by the President’s Commission on Migratory Labor in Texas, demonstrated that if employers paid standard American wages there would be plenty of Americans able and willing to take the jobs. In the Rio Grande Valley of Texas, for example, where tens of thousands of illegal aliens were employed, wages were half that paid in other parts of Texas for the same agricultural jobs. Lyndon Johnson, a Congressman from Texas at the time, first as a Representative and later as a Senator, fought vigorously against measures aimed at illegal aliens and was said to have been in the hip pocket of agribusiness. He was not alone. While American citizens throughout the Southwest complained about the presence of illegal aliens in their communities, Congress was generally unresponsive. Agribusiness had well-paid lobbyists and influence peddlers by the dozen. American citizens suffering from illegal aliens had no such advocates.

It took a military man, who thought that national borders should mean something, to take action. Even before he was elected President during the fall of 1952, Dwight Eisenhower was concerned about illegal aliens. In 1951, in a letter to Senator William Fulbright of Arkansas, who had recently proposed that Congress create a special commission to examine the influence of lobbyists and unethical conduct by government officials, Eisenhower quoted a line from an article in the New York Times that said, “The rise in illegal border-crossing by Mexican ‘wetbacks’ to a current rate of more than 1,000,000 cases a year has been accompanied by a curious relaxation in ethical standards extending all the way from the farmer-exploiters of this contraband labor to the highest levels of the Federal Government.”

It seems that corruption was a fact of life in the Immigration and Naturalization Service and in the Border Patrol. Herbert Brownell, Jr., Eisenhower’s first Attorney General, said that America “was faced with a breakdown in law enforcement on a very large scale. When I say large scale, I mean hundreds of thousands were coming in from Mexico without restraint.” They were also staying here without restraint. Border Patrol agents tell stories of rounding up illegal aliens on large farms, only to have them released after the politically connected employer called the right people.

Once firmly established in the White House, Eisenhower went to work on the problem. Early in 1954, he appointed retired Lt. Gen. Joseph “Jumpin’ Joe” Swing as the new Commissioner of the INS. Eisenhower could not have made a better choice. Handsome and square-jawed with sparkling blue eyes, white hair, and a bearing that suggested strength and decisiveness, the 60-year-old Swing could have come from Central Casting. The New Jersey-born Swing had been a classmate of Eisenhower at West Point, graduating in 1915 as a member of “the class the stars fell on.”

Fresh out of the academy, Swing participated in the Punitive Expedition against Pancho Villa, who raided the border town of Columbus, New Mexico. Swing rose to captain during World War I but remained stateside. He was a full bird colonel by the time World War II erupted and fought in the New Guinea, Leyte, and Luzon campaigns. He landed on Leyte as a major general and commander of the 11th Airborne Division — the “Angels” — which fought brilliantly throughout the Philippines. Included among its feats were the destruction of the vaunted Shimbu force, the spectacular rescue of more than 2,000 Allied prisoners behind enemy lines at Los Banos, and a combined parachute and glider operation at Aparri that trapped a Japanese division, leading to its annihilation. Jumpin’ Joe was in the thick of things and by war’s end his decorations included the Distinguished Service Cross (second only to the Medal of Honor), the Distinguished Service Medal, three Silver Stars, the Legion of Merit, three Bronze Stars, and two Air Medals.

Swingin’ for the Border Fence
With such a background, it is not surprising that Swing provided aggressive leadership as Commissioner of the INS, reorganizing the service and appointing fellow retired generals to key posts. Corrupt and powerful Congressmen, such as Senator Lyndon Johnson of Texas who served the interests of corporate agribusiness and had been able to frustrate the efforts of the Border Patrol, now found themselves facing a new kind of Commissioner in Swing. Moreover, Swing had the full support of President Eisenhower. Disregarding political pressure from Johnson and other such Congressmen, Swing quickly formulated a plan for the apprehension and deportation of illegal aliens, naming it Operation Wetback. On D-day, June 17, 1954, Swing sent 750 of his Border Patrol agents into the field to begin a sweep through Arizona and California. Within a month, Jumpin’ Joe’s boys had taken more than 50,000 illegal aliens into custody — and half a million more, fearing arrest, had self-deported.

During the second half of July, teams of agents were sweeping through Utah, Nevada, and Idaho. They also went into Texas, targeting especially the Rio Grande Valley. Starting at the valley’s southern end and supported by local law enforcement, Border Patrol agents moved northward. On the first day of the sweep, July 15, they took nearly 5,000 illegal aliens into custody. Although not many more than 700 agents were in the field, Border Patrol officials exaggerated the numbers to frighten illegal aliens to flee south of the border. Newspaper editorials, hostile to the operation and in support of corporate interests, also exaggerated the numbers of agents to give the impression that a federal invading army had descended upon the valley. Whether from these exaggerated reports or from actual arrests of illegal aliens, the “wetbacks” of the valley were crossing the border back into Mexico on their own by the thousands each day. The process of self-deportation, demonstrated daily in large numbers during Operation Wetback, is left unmentioned by those who argue that mass deportation of illegal aliens is logistically impossible.

Those taken into custody by the Border Patrol — about 1,100 a day after big numbers during the first week — were transported across the border in trucks and buses and then put on trains bound for Durango. The United States wanted the illegal aliens shipped deep into Mexico to discourage re-entry. They were also taken to Port Isabel, Texas, and put aboard ships such as Emancipation, which then sailed them to Veracruz, 500 miles to the south. Transportation by sea continued until seven illegal aliens jumped off Mercurio in an escape attempt and drowned. Since the United States depended upon the cooperation of the Mexican government in sending illegal aliens deep into Mexico’s interior, protests from Mexico over the drownings caused the United States to end waterborne deportations.

By the end of September, the INS estimated that nearly 100,000 illegal aliens had been taken into custody in Texas and deported and that another 700,000 or so self-deported. Adding those to the numbers of illegal aliens deported or self-deported from Arizona and California, and still more from Utah, Nevada, and Idaho, means that in a few months of aggressive patrolling Jumpin’ Joe’s agents had directly or indirectly sent more than 1.3 million illegal aliens back to Mexico. Moreover, Swing had accomplished this with not many more than 700 agents in the field at any one time and limited funding. What he did have in abundance was the determination and will to enforce the law. For the rest of Swing’s tenure as Commissioner, which ended in 1961, illegal border crossings were down 95 percent. The aggressive and common-sensical approach in policing the border that Jumpin’ Joe established continued to have a salutary effect on border conditions until the mid-1960s when the rate of illegal crossings began increasing dramatically. There were many reasons for the sudden increase, but it’s beyond coincidental that by that time Lyndon Johnson had become President.

During his years as Commissioner, Swing came in for criticism from all the likely sources, including Congressmen who were connected hip-to-hip with agribusiness and other employers of cheap (to the employers only) Mexican labor. Swing, who had “a hair trigger temper” but also a great sense of humor, did not suffer fools or corrupt politicians gladly and simply responded matter-of-factly, and thus politically incorrectly, to the problems caused by the presence of illegal aliens and slack border security. He also liked to emphasize that while special interests might have a problem with him, the great majority of American people wholeheartedly supported Operation Wetback and his strict border policies. Also, supporting Swing was the American G.I. Forum, an organization of Mexican-American military veterans. Together with the Texas State Federation of Labor, the G.I. Forum published What Price Wetbacks?, a study which demonstrated that not only did illegal aliens undercut wages and displace American workers but that the de facto open-border policy of past years was a threat to the security of the United States. Most members of Congress also supported Swing, voting in 1958 to increase his salary as Commissioner of the INS from $17,500 a year to $20,000.

Homeland Hindrances
What Swing did in 1954, we could do today — if we had the political will. Retired Border Patrol agent Walt Edwards, who participated in the sweep through the Southwest in 1954, declared in 2006, “Some say we cannot send 12 million illegals now in the United States back where they came from. Of course we can!” Edwards also noted, “When we start enforcing the law, these various businesses are, on their own, going to replace their [illegal] workforce with a legal workforce.” Donald Coppock, who was also with the Border Patrol during the 1950s and led it from 1960 to 1973, said that if Eisenhower were President and Swing Commissioner today, they’d seal the border and deport illegal aliens “in a minute.”

Another Operation Wetback, though, would also require the abolition of a little-known but byzantine and powerful agency within the Department of Justice formally termed the Executive Office for Immigration Review and commonly referred to as the EOIR. The agency was created in 1983 through an internal DOJ reorganization, essentially establishing Immigration Courts independent of the INS. Since then immigration attorneys on behalf of their clients have flooded the EOIR with endless paperwork, postponements, and appeals, which can drag what should be a quick and incontestable deportation into years of delays. Moreover, Immigration Court decisions can be appealed to the Board of Immigration Appeals and decisions of the BIA can be appealed to a federal circuit appellate court. Summary deportation that prevailed in 1954 has been replaced by infinite immigration litigation. During these proceedings most illegal aliens are released on an immigration bond. If an illegal alien sees that his case is going badly and he will be ordered deported, he simply fails to appear for his final hearing. There are more than 300,000 illegal aliens in such a status.

In its report, The Deportation Abyss: It Ain’t Over ’Til the Alien Wins, the Center for Immigration Studies reports:

Between the incompetence of the INS [now ICE], the complete lack of alien detention center space, and the bureaucracy of the EOIR, our system for deporting known illegal aliens and criminal alien residents is a sad joke. But no one is laughing.

If all of the illegal aliens and deportable resident alien criminals were rounded up tomorrow, the system would not be capable of handling them. It would be an absolute disaster. The INS and EOIR wouldn’t have the foggiest idea of what to do with them! The aliens would all be released back out on the street on immigration bonds and go back right where they were as if nothing happened, while their cases would grind on through the system of Immigration Court hearings and endless appeals.

The creation of the EOIR, like the creation of most federal bureaucracies, in turn spawned an entire industry. There are now thousands of attorneys who specialize in immigration law. They are represented by their own lobbying group, the American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA). Meanwhile, the EOIR employs more than 200 immigration judges, all pulling down six-figure salaries and enjoying generous federal benefits, a far cry from Commissioner Swing’s top salary of $20,000.

We got ourselves into this mess and we can get ourselves out of it. However, to do so it will take bold, decisive, and forceful leaders the caliber of Lt. Gen. Joseph Swing — that is if America still produces such men.

— Photo of J.M. Swing: AP Images
Trackback(0)
Comments (16)add comment

William said:

0
What about "Bracero"?
While I've enjoyed Dr. McGrath's writings at Chronicles, and a well-thumbed copy of his book "Gunfighters, Highwaymen, and Vigilantes" adorns my bookshelf, he is guilty of a critical omission in this treatment of "Operation Wetback."

Dr. McGrath's piece depicts Mexican laborers as "taking advantage" of dislocations in the labor market caused by the war socialist economy of WWII. In fact, it was the same FDR regime that invited those laborers into the country through the 1942 Bracero Treaty, which didn't expire until 1963.

It was the same treaty that set the minimum wage for migrant labor at 30 cents an hour (see -- http://www.commonsenseradio.com/bracerotreaty.html ) -- thereby creating the depressive effect on wages lamented by Dr. McGrath.

In short, this was a problem largely created by the same government that imposed the militaristic "solution" extolled in this essay as a model for contemporary policy.

By omitting "Bracero" from this discussion, the villains of the piece are insidious Mexicans and conniving businessmen, and the heroes are "decisive, forceful" military leaders in positions of political authority. Interestingly, the chief hero in this essay is Dwight Eisenhower; I wonder what Robert Welch would have to say about this....
July 13, 2010
Mr, Lowly rated comment [Show]

Michael said:

0
...
Ali, you can return later when the mess is repaired.
July 13, 2010

Flu-Bird said:

0
Deport them all
I say instead of blowing millions on bilingiualism and use it to round up all ilegal aliens and return them to where they came from and make their own goverments pay for their up keep and we deport BARACK OBAMA the worst of the illegal aliens
July 13, 2010
..., Lowly rated comment [Show]

fed up said:

0
...
If a bank robber has kids, should he not go to prison for his crime? I'm tired of the children being the reason illegals need to stay in America. Having kids is your choice and it's your responsibility to take them with you to Mexico. Our country is facing a horrible recession and that means AMERICANS have priority over the jobs you take. We as the tax payers can no longer foot the bill for every illegal alien baby born on our soil. We can no longer pay for the billions in welfare services and education.
DEPORT, DEPORT, DEPORT every last one of them. No more excuses, end the madness already! Mexico needs you. Go fix this rotten country you talk about. Start a revolution in Mexico and take your country back from the cartels.
July 16, 2010 | url

Ali said:

0
read before you rant!
@fed up: You obviously have no idea what I said. Plz read again (carefully) and then comment.
1.Not everyone comes here(legally or illegally) from Mexico!
2. I have not worked illegally ever in the U.S
3. You have (and should) have priority over the jobs. But I think you would be better served if you also focus on the jobs being exported oversees due to 'free trade' or globalization. Most of the jobs that you used to have(and apparently took for granted)are the blue-collar jobs that are increasingly outsourced.
4. Please show decency when you talk about someone's child. I said it plainly that I am appealing to the human conscience(and not that the law should or would consider it). I hope you have one!

I love this country. You don't have to be a born/naturalized citizen to be able to appreciate its greatness.

Regards,
Ali
July 17, 2010

faruk mahta said:

0
3 year deportation plan
I have devised a deportation plan for the illegal mexicans in particular. Thereason some people want them back to mexico is that they are a life changing nusance . I live next door to some and they have stolen my peace and tranquility in large numbers. My plan is this . When investigators have found an illegal . they shiuld first aproach his , her employer and press any charges there but theyre cooperation is necessary for my plan to work. first they are confronted with the facts that they are alaw breaker and can be deported immediately , however they can choose the 3 year plan which requies them to sign an agreement to waive legal rights to fight in court, agree to a fine , pay their own way back to their country, they have 3 years to take care of business like sale of property etc move their families. I have more details . if some one signs and trys to default the government can seize their property which can be used to fund the trips home for other illegal who do not take , accept the plan. As for the argument about anchor babies are they your kids or the countrys/.. if they had never come here they would not even have what they got so they are still ahead.
July 19, 2010 | url

faruk mahta said:

0
more 3 year plan
adding to 3 year plan employer should( as part of deal) contact unemployment agency, and make a seamlees job transfer of an american worker into the ilegal alien workers position.
July 19, 2010 | url

lee Gonzales said:

0
most displeased with fiasco of immigration policies
I know it planned that way by way far hidden from public Insiders. But I, this poor unfortunate possessor of VISA card, have no great booming voice as O'Reilly factor man who like to tell peoples on his show "Oh, you shut your trap!"

I only looking out for America and not for my selfish person that I am, for I am deep,deep sinner and know that I live in a uniqueness land of opportunity bountiless! What for I tell you good people these things only to warn you of reptiles that lurk in the Congress of halls and Houses of White that want to keep border doors open for scoundrels of immense nastiness to enter there upon us and provide excuses for clamp down of more freedoms cherished.

July 26, 2010

faruk mahta said:

0
more 3 year plan
everytime someone asks a politician or left wing commie... we should enforce the border they talk comprehensive immigration policy. they mean amnesty for illegal mexican , guats etc. my 3 year plan IS comprehensive illegal immagration policy. most ilegal aliens from mexico are il-literate, like it that way, , people say all they want is a job. My experience is thjat these dregs are comming here to change our country to their idea of mexico, theyre so dumb about their own country of origin how can we give them free entrance into our country without making sure they want to be Americans. Also I know many Americans of mexican ethnicity , they dont want to let em all in .. And they vote ..,I don not get it when politicians say they are courting the latino vote . someone should poll American Lationos . American born not all them fence and river jumpers who say they speak for the American lationo voters.
July 29, 2010 | url

SCHNORCHEL said:

0
Illegal immigration is pre-merger
smilies/sad.gif If you go to the White House web-page at http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-...n-leaders, you can see why illegal immigration is the policy of the governments of North America. Illegal immigration will ready the U.S. demographically for a merger with the other nations whose inhabitants already exist inside the U.S.

Unless that policy is reversed, no massive deportation of illegals will occur, even though this article shows that it is feasible.

The INSIDERS who want this policy are hell-bent on merging the United States with Canada and with Mexico into an administrative region, so that eventually that region will be merged with all of South America and later with Europe under a New World Order.
July 30, 2010

elizabeth jones said:

0
citizens
YES THEY WANT TO MAKE THEIR BABIES LEGAL CITIZENS AND THAN THEY CAN STAY...by the way I found a website that give you prizes for your opinions and 4 play online games here is the topic about this: http://opinion.ezwingame.com/t...bies-in-us
July 31, 2010 | url

Carson said:

0
Two step plan
Here is my two-step plan.

We may have to kiss the keisters of the illegal invaders, it is still a felony to aid and abet them.

If some honest men and women in law enforcement, would go after the lowlifes in the government, business, and the general population that have been aiding and abetting them, by the time they had enough of a handle on the job to raise their heads and look around, I don’t think many illegal aliens would still be left.

We don't need any new laws to do this either. Just some honest men and women in law enforcement that take their oaths of office seriously!

Finding them is the first step!



Federal Immigration and Nationality Act
Section 8 USC 1324(a)(1)(A)(iv)(B)(ii)

"Any person who . . . encourages or induces an alien to . . . reside . . . knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that such . . . residence is . . . in violation of law, shall be punished as provided . . . for each alien in respect to whom such a violation occurs . . . fined under title 18 . . . imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both."
Section 274 felonies under the federal Immigration and Nationality Act, INA 274A(a)(1)(A):
A person (including a group of persons, business, organization, or local government) commits a federal felony when she or he:
* assists an alien s/he should reasonably know is illegally in the U.S. or who lacks employment authorization, by transporting, sheltering, or assisting him or her to obtain employment, or
* encourages that alien to remain in the U.S. by referring him or her to an employer or by acting as employer or agent for an employer in any way, or
* knowingly assists illegal aliens due to personal convictions.


A smaller percentage of the criminals involved in the tyranny are of Hispanic decent than one would imagine at first glance!
August 01, 2010

Paula said:

0
They now resist
Back in the 50s the Mexicans were more passive than now. Now, they have a sense of entitlement given by the U.S. govt. by permittng them to stay here and flourish, and by the Mexican govt. who tells them to cross the border and take what is theirs -- the mythical land of Aztlan. Rounding them up will be accompanied by violence as they resist being removed from "their lands" which once were part of Mexico.
August 02, 2010

faruk mahta said:

0
more 3 year plan
it can be a 2 step plan or a 3 year plan .. just do something. ilegals from mexico cant help but be socialists. The Hispanic voters of this country are not for amnesty.. Who-ever is trying to get these peoplke amnesty has giving them the vote in mind , remember , they want free stuff , thats why they have so many kids , they love the SOCIAL programs that allows them to breed like rats when everybody who has to pay teir own medical and food bill cant afford to,have too many children and not suffer financialy I see them at the grocery store with teir wick cards and woc cards stocking up on stuff for their barbecues they have and bother their neibors with loud music trash all over and kids running amok
August 10, 2010 | url

Write comment
This content has been locked. You can no longer post any comment.
You must log in to post a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy