In a development policymakers cite as a huge win for intervention in the marketplace, last week the federal government nearly suspended the Car Allowance Rebate System (also known as cash for clunkers), owing to a lack of funds, after consumers burned through the budgeted amount in only four days.

The suspension did not take place as CARS — which was originally funded to the tune of $1 billion — will receive another infusion of $2 billion to keep the program alive.

The political spin machines in Washington and congressional offices everywhere are touting cash for clunkers as the salvation of our economy. Such a statement is an outright lie. It should be grossly apparent that the program’s popularity and subsequent budgeting problems show not the strength of intervention, but rather its most significant flaw: socialist market policy does not have the ability to sustain itself. It cannibalizes itself and feeds off the vibrant — and freer — components of the economy.

The money used to fund CARS was acquired from the private sector through direct taxation or indirect taxation (otherwise known as inflation). Under the former scenario, money that could have been utilized by consumers and businesses in more productive ways was taken from them, tempering the further advancement of market sectors that have been healthy. Through government sleight-of-hand, those once-active dollars are now being used to prop up a slumping automotive industry, a market that consumers have willingly abandoned during, and even before, the recession. Conversely, that money — which could have been used to develop new technologies in pharmaceuticals or consumer electronics — cannot be invested in the future growth of healthy companies because it was “invested” instead by the government in an effort to correct an industry gone bad. Similar public actions that favor the weak over the strong and the irresponsible over the responsible account for the continued demise of USA-based manufacturers of consumer and industrial goods that are competing in a global marketplace: their hard-earned rewards have become the ill-begotten prize of the collective America.

The chances are good, though, that CARS was not funded through tax dollars, and it is evident future CARS funding cannot and will not come from taxes. Like the $60 billion the government has already used to buy and/or bailout General Motors, new cash for clunkers will be made available by borrowing from the Federal Reserve, increasing the supply of fiat dollars and negatively affecting their overall value which, in the end, decreases the purchasing power of both producers and consumers.

Ironically, it is poor governmental decisions like this one that have prevent consumers from buying more cars. Even though the average worker of today may have a higher wage than one 10 years ago, his or her buying power has decreased to the point that a new car has become a luxury, something put off until the last possible moment or never. Rather than exiting this inflationary mess, the government adopted a means by which to exacerbate the problem through repetition of the same socialist tendencies.

Continuing with the irony, not only will CARS hurt the economy as a whole, but it will also weaken the very industry it was supposed to protect.

Cash for clunkers will, first and foremost, create a temporary bubble very similar to that of the housing bubble, the bursting of which helped spawn this recession. Housing purchases spiked and then tumbled because bad public policy forced banks to make available reams of easy money to consumers of suspect credit and income who only a few years into their mortgages discovered they could no longer afford them. The same will likely happen with vehicles: the $4,500 rebate will give many people undue confidence in their buying and borrowing abilities which, coupled with business-starved dealers looking to make an easy sale, will induce them into purchasing vehicles they cannot afford. A year from now — or maybe sooner based on the current job market — they will renege on their responsibility to the lender, putting us all on the hook for their indiscretions, weakening the credit market even more and prolonging the recession. This is a very real future, one virtually guaranteed to occur and one that we wouldn’t have to worry about were the government to stay out of the marketplace and not artificially excite it by unconstitutionally subsidizing the masses.  

Also, as important as the sale of new cars are assumed to be by Congress, policymakers fail to see that the used-car market is just as important. Not everyone can afford a new vehicle. The teenager or young adult who is getting his first car will buy a used one. So will the blue-collar father who works that extra job to put food on the table for his wife and children. So will the cost-conscious entrepreneur starting-up her new business. But in the very near future, they won’t be able to make that purchase because CARS demands that the clunkers turned-in are destroyed, eliminating them from resale. That will impact the market in two ways. It will limit the availability of used automobiles (the government’s definition of a clunker is anything but a clunker), and those used vehicles that remain will have higher price tags because of the lower supply. This atypical market activity is a direct result of federal intervention and its outcome — that many middle-class Americans won’t be able to purchase or afford the cars they want — will probably induce yet more intervention to correct the problem further down the road.  

These glaring weaknesses and risky prospects of the cash for clunkers program have been ignored by the news outlets at large, which have put the program in a favorable spotlight at its inception and during the current refunding process. Unfortunately, because of such press, a good many Americans — of both left and right persuasion — have welcomed CARS with open arms. Let us hope that cooler heads prevail in the coming weeks and coming years and throw up some roadblocks to the expansion of this and similar assaults on the free-market system.

TrackBack URI for this entry

Comments (6)

Subscribe to this comment's feed

bds85466 said:

Good take on 'success' I think you hit the nail on the head. This thing reminds me of a smaller version of the community reinvestment act which was a large part of the even bigger mortgage crisis. The saddest part is that this billion (or 3) is simply a drop in the bucket, behemothed by the now estimated 23 trillion dollar bail out.

August 04, 2009

WillSan said:

hmmm i think the real irony is that this is a small scale reversal of trickle down economics..and so many people are up in arms. Considering all the scandals over the last few years...from Enron to the most recent financial breakdown. This program is actually refreshing, when cast against all the money given to these financial firms, funds unaccounted for in the rebuilding of Iraq...i could go on and on. I think these pillars of industry are truly irresponsible, they valued profit or all else at the expense of you and I..this includes big pharma and the electronic industry. Unless these banks have the attention span of a gnat, there should be no car bubble of 2009-2010...as you don't need to delve to deep into a Google news search on loans(vehicle, home, etc) to see banks have tightened their purse strings and are holding tight to that money that Uncle Sam and we the taxpayer made available. It's not the best plan, but it's a better direction than we have been going in a long time... you have better, send a recommendation to you congressman. Bring them solutions, not more problems...that's the real problem nowadays. To many arm chair critics...get off your computer and do something.

August 04, 2009

Flu-Bird said:

Cash for clinkers Instead of blowing more money on wastful programs whats realy needed is for every one of those liberals to get voted out of office and that includes CHAPAQUEDIC TED

August 05, 2009

Luke Michelsen said:

... Excellent article you couldn’t have put it any better. Lukemichelsen.com

August 06, 2009 | url

missmurphy said:

really? This is not a "better direction"- you must have zero understanding of inflation or socialism. Cash for Clunkers is a failure- when will people realize that the money the federal government is giving away is OURS- not theirs!! They aren't just sitting on this huge mound of cash that they every once in a while decide to splurge and pass a stimulus package or a STUPID program like this one. This is money that they are stealing from us to subsidize the auto industry. And another failure is that people aren't even using this to buy and prop up American made cars- they are buying Toyotas, Hondas,and Hyundais!! HA HA HA.

August 07, 2009

bob ney said:

Talk Show Host/Political Analyst Very good observations. I am going to comment today on my talk show http://www.wvly.net Monday Through Friday 1-3 p.m. EDT Good Article! Bob Ney

August 24, 2009 | url