On August 13, 1751, Ben Franklin was placed on a committee in the Pennsylvania Assembly to draft a bill dealing with the exclusion of criminals from the province, which a certain class of immigrants were in high proportion to all the rest.

Franklin was the perfect man for the job for it was a matter he had already addressed quite incisively in a delightful little parable he had written in the “Gazette” for 9 May 1751. Addressing himself as “Americanus,”  he aimed a bitter arrow at the British government, which insisted on exporting felons to the colonies, no matter how the colonies protested. It was, the mother country said, for the “improvement and well peopling” of America. Such parental concern, Americanus thought, called for some kind of filial acknowledgment, and at least the offer of repayment. Americanus had a plan. (1)

In some of the uninhabited parts of these provinces there are numbers of the venomous reptiles we call rattle-snakes: felons-convict from the beginning of the world. These, whenever we meet with them, we put to death, by virtue of an old law: Thou shalt bruise his head. But as this is a sanguinary law, and may seem too cruel; and as, however mischievous those creatures are with us, they may possibly change their natures if they were to change the climate; I would humbly propose that this general sentence of death be charged for transportation. In the spring of the year, when they first creep out of their holes, they are feeble, heavy, slow, and easily taken; and if a small bounty were allowed per head, some thousands might be collected annually and transported to Britain. There I would propose to have them carefully distributed in St. James Park, in the Spring Gardens and other places of pleasure about London; in the gardens of all the nobility and gentry throughout the nation; but particularly in the gardens of the prime ministers, the lords of trade, and members of Parliament, for to them we are most particularly obliged.

There might be some difficulties in the scheme, but no worse than went with the transporting of felons to America. “Let not private interests obstruct public utility. Our mother knows what is best for us. What is a little housebreaking, shoplifting, or highway robbing; what is a son now and then corrupted and hanged, a daughter debauched and poxed, a wife stabbed or a husband’s throat cut, or a child’s brains beat out with an axe, compared with this improvement and well peopling of the colonies?”

Whatever damage the rattle-snakes might do might be offset by their good example. “Might not the honest, rough British gentry, by a familiarity with these reptiles, learn to creep and to insinuate and to slaver and to wriggle into place (and perhaps to poison such as stand in their way): qualities of no small advantage to courtiers?”

This would be a just trade as well as gratitude for a favour. “Rattle-snakes seem the most suitable returns for the human serpents sent to us by our mother country. In this, however, as in every other branch of trade, she will have the advantage of us. She will reap equal benefits without equal risk of the inconveniences and dangers. For the rattle-snake gives warning before he attempts his mischief; which the convict does not.” (2)

Wit and wisdom? Yes – for all immigration plans, all “free” market ploys, all protection plans for the so-called inalienable right to move where-ever one pleases whenever one pleases, especially the sort that invite our neighbor’s worst to move in on us illegally, to feed off the fat of the land, and otherwise housebreak, shoplift, rob, rape, beat, corrupt, debauch, and pox, and then hand us the bill, an enormous bill at that … are not equal, nor, frankly, seem to aim at the “improvement and well peopling of America.”

Maybe we should return the favor and let Mexico, and Cuba, and the nations of the Middle East, and all the other nations benefit from the lessons they may learn, that they ought to learn by having to tolerate, no, embrace and exalt the “legally challenged” who come to us so generously from them. And every American elitist and economic theorist too; let them relocate to America’s border towns and be set up in a permanent settlement to be educated and benefited and forever blessed from their infinite wisdom and love of liberty without bounds.

At least that’s how I see it … and how I think Ben would see it too.

Steve Far­rell is one of the orig­i­nal pun­dits at Sil­ver Eddy Award Win­ner, NewsMax.com (1999–2008), asso­ciate pro­fes­sor of polit­i­cal econ­omy at George Wythe Uni­ver­sity, the author of the highly praised inspi­ra­tional novel “Dark Rose,” and edi­tor in chief of The Moral Liberal.

Footnotes:

1. Orden, Carl Van. Benjamin Franklin, 1939, p. 201.
2. Ibid. pp. 201-202.

TrackBack URI for this entry

Comments (3)

Subscribe to this comment's feed

Flu-Bird said:

I support ARIZONA I support the arizona law we need all fify states to defy obama and his sinister plans we need to all suceed from WASHINGTON D.C. and end the tyrany of our elected dictaor,ARIZONA YEA OBAMA BOO

July 27, 2010

Bea said:

... One little problem w/ your analogy: the felons whom George II was exporting had stood trial and been convicted. Modern immigrants have not. Indeed, they are often fleeing corruption (inspired and usually financed by American interests, a la Mexico's war on drugs)or even persecution. Frankin was NOT advocating a police state like Arizona's that prevents people from exercising their God-give right of migration. You do both him and American history a disservice to imply otherwise. Immigrants were highly valued in the colonies b/c of a chronic shortage of labor. In fact, employers were so eager for workers that they often paid their passage -- and gave their children to them as well: these indentured servants frequently married into the master's family. You also ignore the many, many studies that show illegal immigrants commit no more crimes than anyone else. Those "proving" they do usually count the mere fact of their immigration as a crime. It's too bad more Americans don't spurn bad, tyrannical law as "illegal" immigrants do. We'd enjoy far more liberty if we'd grow a spine to match theirs.

July 27, 2010

Lyle said:

Curing Illness or Spreading Disease? Illegal immigration is trespass. Trespass is a misdemeanor. Misdemeanors do not require court appointed legal representation or trial by jury. Due Process for deportation is greatly facilitated when it fits the crime. Also, we do not teach others correct principles when we allow ourselves to be the ones who are taught. Let's not mistake curing illness with spreading disease. Rules for Naturalization exist for a reason.

July 27, 2010