Leonardo DiCaprio does it again with this summer’s new blockbuster hit, Inception. Not everyone will agree with that, however. I contend that there will be two camps that develop in the theaters: those who become so frustrated over the utter confusion and suspension of disbelief involved in viewing Inception that they despise the film; and those who throw caution to the wind, allow themselves to be sucked into the science fiction, and enjoy every captivating moment. Count me in the second camp.

In the world of Inception, the technology exists that allows people to penetrate the human mind in its most vulnerable state, through dreams. This allows them to extract personal and valuable secrets, and Dom Cobb (Leonardo DiCaprio) is just the skilled thief who can make it happen. It is this very skill, however, that has labeled Cobb as an international fugitive, forcing him to travel on the run through Europe and Asia.

Desperate to get back to his family, Cobb needs the help of a powerful man, one whose phone call could remove Cobb’s fugitive label, allowing him to return to his family in America. That man is Saito (Ken Watanabe), a Japanese entrepreneur. In order to secure the assistance of Saito, however, Cobb must agree to perform a nearly impossible act on Saito’s leading business competitor, Robert Fisher, Jr. (Cillian Murphy): inception. Rather than merely extracting ideas and secrets from an individual, inception involves implanting an idea in an individual’s mind and allowing it to grow. The difficulty, however, is making that individual believe that the idea was in fact, his own.

Because of this very obstacle, inception involves implanting the simplest form of the idea in the deepest levels of one’s subconscious by penetrating through layers of the mind. It is a task that Cobb willingly takes, and he secures a team of intelligent and experienced individuals to help him achieve success. Accompanied by Arthur (Joseph Gordon-Levitt), Ariadne (Ellen Page), Earnes (Tom Hardy), Yusuf (Dileep Rao), and Saito, Cobb begins his descent into the defensive subconscious of Robert Fisher, Jr.

Unfortunately, unbeknownst to the team, Cobb is plagued by memories of his deceased wife (Marion Cotillard) that are stored in his own subconscious, and those memories creep into the dreams of those that Cobb enters. Cobb’s inability to control those subconscious thoughts could prove to be detrimental to himself and the team in a task that is already highly dangerous.

Directed by Christopher Nolan, who boasts such hits as The Dark Knight, The Prestige, and Memento, Inception is virtually a marriage of Shutter Island and The Matrix. Much of the film forces viewers to question where reality has ended and the dream has begun. It is the type of film that does not allow viewers even a moment to blink or leave the theater, lest they may miss something that is entirely necessary to understand the film.

Dom Cobb is a truly tortured character. And who could become Dom Cobb but Leonardo DiCaprio? The actor has already proven his ability to live up to this role by his performances in Revolutionary Road and Shutter Island, both wonderful films where DiCaprio played men haunted by memories and dreams gone awry. DiCaprio has truly grown into a magnificent actor, with an ability to show an array of emotions in a single facial expression. With the exception of a few films, DiCaprio can add Inception to an already-impressive r�sum� that showcases his abilities as one of the greatest young actors of our time.

In addition to impeccable acting, the graphics, fight scenes, and explosions found in Inception are enough to secure a nomination for Best Cinematography. Much of the film spans across multiple realities and dream sequences, a risky strategy that only a director like Christopher Nolan could do so well.

Inception does not pander to the standards set by all modern movies to include a strong female character, a tactic which oftentimes seems out of place. Instead, all of the characters appear to be a bit unsure of themselves, especially Cobb, though few of them willingly admit to it. It is that very uncertainty that draws the audience into the film, forcing viewers to actively engage in every moment of the movie.

Avoiding temptations to include unnecessary sexual content and even profanity, Inception’s sole focus is its intricate plot and flawless acting. While there is violence, it is not at all graphic, and is usually committed against subconscious projections of the mind. Therefore, nobody actually dies.

Ambiguity resonates throughout the entire film, from the very beginning to the last second. It is a fractured story that comes together, to a degree, leading viewers from utter confusion to a final “ah.”

If you are tired of movies that seem merely to insult your intelligence, Inception would be the perfect film for you, as it truly necessitates an audience of bright viewers. If you are interested in being a complacent moviegoer with little interest in putting together pieces of a puzzle, perhaps Inception is not your forte.

My prediction is that you can expect to see Inception nominated for a variety of well-deserved Academy Awards.

TrackBack URI for this entry

Comments (6)

Subscribe to this comment's feed

Flu-Bird said:

Not a DeCapreo fan I am not a big time fan of LEONARDO DeCAPREO since he is a big time enviromentalists hypotcrit im very unlikly to watch his movies as a result of his arrogance

July 18, 2010

Bronco said:

Random thoughts on the movie... Good idea, bad execution The concept for this movie is brilliant... And I highly recommend one see it because of it's very thought provoking. However Nolan's execution in telling the story falls short - and I believe he missed an opportunity here. There are cinematography and diction issues that the movie simply could not overcome for me. For example, Ellen Page's character is introduced as the key player to architect the entire "inception" scheme, but but the end of the film her presence is so obligatory I almost forgot why they brought her on board in the first place. Also, particularly towards the end of the film, the scenes are stitched together in an unnecessarily discombobulated way (I realize there is some need to keep the viewer guessing... however it just comes across as poor editing decisions). The elevator scene... where one of the team members is left behind to ensure they all get their "kick" in sync("kick" is an extractionist's slang for waking up in a dream via the "freefall" experience) could have been handled in one scene, yet they keep cutting back to it again and again in the midst of other action scenes to show these gravity-less fist fights and to see the floating bodies lassoed and stuffed in an elevator (as goofy as that sounds, the movie provided a plausible explanation for why this was done).

July 18, 2010

Bronco said:

And the special effects... And the special effects. The peeling of Paris like a banana was cool, but what was the point of that scene where fruit and vegetable carts are exploding all around a stationary DiCaprio and Page? It looked cool, but was just downright silly and out of place if u think about it for a second. Could there not have been a more intelligent way to display the properties of their dream world? There was one outstanding scene where a locomotive comes barreling through the downtown of their dreamworld's Urban landscape... like a ghost train coming down 5th Avenue in New York and tearing up the pavement and flipping over cars, etc. It also has timed just right, as we learn at this moment about the big hitch in their scheme. These are are the kinds of quirky images that Nolan could have delivered to us in this film. After all, instead that what dreams are all about... our mental prevision of reality? Instead we get alot of abandoned cities and spooky old houses that have been seen in just about every dystopia/disaster movie ever made.

July 18, 2010

Lyle said:

Be You're Own Man I liked the film. A little boring at the beginning while explaining how Inception works but necessary. The "idea" to be planted was unoriginal: "A man who follows in his father's footsteps, who accepts his inheritance, is not his own man." But one can hardly right off the entire movie because of a lame idea to be planted. Anyway, good stuff.

July 19, 2010

Lyle said:

To Inherit or Not To Inherit Civilization is not inherited; it has to be learned and earned by each generation anew; if the transmission should be interrupted for one century, civilization would die, and we should be savages again. --Will and Ariel Durant10

July 21, 2010

rosa said:

what a movie this was a very strange film for me. I found I was enjoying the fil at the beginning; as it seems to have it's own cinematic rules. You have to change your oen perspective to grasp what was going on. By the end I was loving it, and left the cinema enlightened.

August 14, 2010