Philadelphia: The City of Brotherly Love. The home of Independence Hall, where the Declaration of Independence and the U.S. Constitution were drafted. The town where blogging costs $300.

Yes, you read that correctly. According to the Philadelphia City Paper, anyone with a blog that has the potential to generate profits — even if it doesn’t actually generate any — is required by the city of Philadelphia to pay $300 for a business privilege license. (Bloggers can opt for the $50 annual fee in lieu of the $300 lifetime license.)

The report explains the city’s rationale thus:

Even though small-time bloggers aren’t exactly raking in the dough, the city requires privilege licenses for any business engaged in any “activity for profit,” says tax attorney Michael Mandale of Center City law firm Mandale Kaufmann. This applies “whether or not they earned a profit during the preceding year,” he adds.

So even if your blog collects only a handful of hits a day, as long as there’s the potential for it to be lucrative — and, as Mandale points out, most hosting sites set aside space for bloggers to sell advertising — the city thinks you should cut it a check. According to Andrea Mannino of the Philadelphia Department of Revenue, in fact, simply choosing the option to make money from ads — regardless of how much or little money is actually generated — qualifies a blog as a business. The same rules apply to freelance writers.

The upshot is that some bloggers who made the mistake of reporting their meager earnings to the city were informed that they must pay for a business privilege license, plus the wage tax, business privilege tax (on top of the business privilege license), and net profits tax. For example, Marilyn Bess, who operates a blog called MS Philly Organic and occasionally posts on ehow.com, has made a whopping $50 from these ventures over the last few years yet is now being forced to pony up six times that for the privilege of doing business in Philadelphia.

Sean Barry, who runs a music-oriented blog called Circle of Fits, earned a whole $11 from it over the last two years and also got a business privilege license notice from the city. Barry, however, epitomizes the problem rather than the solution, telling the City Paper, “I don’t think blogs should be taxed unless they are making an immense profit.”

But who is to decide what constitutes an “immense profit”? At what level of income does it become acceptable for the government to force someone to fork over his own money for the privilege of working within its jurisdiction?

Is this really likely to help the city anyway? Won’t it be more apt to cause bloggers either to stop accepting any profits — meaning they will have less to spend in the city — or to move to a locale that does not penalize them for being productive?

Although, as the City Paper points out, a measure will soon be proposed in the city council to exempt the first $100,000 of profit from the business privilege tax, it does nothing about the $300 license fee, nor does it get to the root of the problem: the idea that individuals’ money belongs to the government first and that individuals ought to be grateful for whatever small amount their benevolent overseers allow them to keep.

These license fees and taxes should be repealed, not reformed. Repealing them would encourage bloggers and other businessmen to operate in the city, which in turn would go a long way toward restoring that unalienable right declared in Philadelphia 234 years ago: the pursuit of happiness.

TrackBack URI for this entry

Comments (3)

Subscribe to this comment's feed

Flu-Bird said:

Greedy city council Looks like the only brotherly love they have is the love for more money to line their pockets with typical of a bunch of liberal reptiles lower then a snake in a wagon rut

August 24, 2010

WitStop said:

There's another reason no to live in Philly So much for the city where Liberty once reigned. It is far better to move away from Philly than to give more money to the wasteful and out-of-touch city government. WitStop

August 25, 2010 | url

EVOlved said:

paying for privilege Sprint has a similar idea with additional charges applied to every customer who purchases the new EVO phone. Unfortunately, it is not a one time, rather a monthly $10 added to each phone for 4G. My plan already includes "unlimited data" and Sprint has no 4G in my area as yet. We got 2 phones with a family plan, so it costs an additional $20 each month for the privilege of owning this phone. That's $240/yr! When I recently questioned customer service about this, they no longer said it was for 4G but stated that this phone is capable of high data usage even with the slower 3G network. For the love of money, what part of "unlimited" are we missing?

August 31, 2010