Some ads are provided by Google
They are not endorsed by The New American
| Census Should Stick To Constitutional Limits, Says Ron Paul | | Print | |
| Written by Steven Yates | ||||||||||||||||
| Tuesday, 09 March 2010 16:20 | ||||||||||||||||
|
A capsule overview of the history of the census might be useful. The single reference to conducting a census in the Constitution occurs in Article I, Sec. 9: “No Capitation, or other direct, Tax shall be laid, unless in proportion to the Census or enumeration herein before directed to be taken.” And, from Article I, Sec. 2: “The actual Enumeration shall be made within three Years after the first Meeting of the Congress of the United States, and within every subsequent Term of ten Years, in such Manner as they shall by Law direct.” The first census was taken in 1790. Its purpose was a headcount to determine how many persons lived in each Congressional District. This was to apportion Congressional seats among the various states. In 1810, however, the government began collecting information on additional questions such as housing conditions, schools, achievement of students and the economy, and so on. The amount of information on census forms continued to expand over ensuing decades. Most constitutionalists now see many questions on the census as invasions of citizens’ privacy. Many of the questions mirror the shift to collectivism and redistribution of the wealth we have seen over the past century. In a column explaining his No vote, Dr. Paul wrote, “The invasive nature of the current census raises serious questions about how and why government will use the collected information. It also demonstrates how the federal bureaucracy consistently encourages citizens to think of themselves in terms of groups, rather than as individual Americans. The not so subtle implication is that each group, whether ethnic, religious, social, or geographic, should speak up and demand its “fair share” of federal largesse.” Moreover, many observers of how the federal government now conducts its business wonder what will be done with the information collected. This year, for the first time, the feds have recorded the GPS coordinates of every front door on every street in every city and town in America, so they can pinpoint our locations with greater accuracy. The U.S. Census Bureau assures us that our information is safe. It will be locked away for 72 years, and not made available to other agencies. But as Dr. Paul observes, information from a census was used during World War II to locate Japanese Americans; it was used during the Vietnam War era to find those who refused military conscription; it has been used by the IRS to detect tax evaders. I was recently afforded an advanced glance at this year’s ten-question form online. The 2010 Census stresses simplicity. The first question asks, “How many were living in this house, apartment, or mobile home on April 1, 2010?” The form should have stopped there. The second question asks, “Were there any additional people staying here April 1, 2010 that you did not include in Question 1?” It almost sounds as though the author(s) of this year’s census do not trust people to answer Question 1 truthfully! If the U.S. Census Bureau trusts us, then why put that kind of question on the 2010 Census? Many federal laws and regulations are, of course, built up under the assumption that we taxpaying citizens cannot be trusted. To the other questions, Dr. Paul tells us, we are constitutionally justified in telling the U.S. Census Bureau, “None of your business.” Not returning the form, however, or returning it incomplete, will exact the following consequence: a census bureaucrat will pay you a visit to get the answers in person. Continued refusal to cooperate can result in a fine of up to $5,000. No law-abiding U.S. citizens would give compliance with the census a second thought, of course, were it limited to, “How many people reside at this address?” Photo: AP Images Trackback(0)
Comments (10)
Flu-Bird
said:
|
Every time a year ending in a zero swings around, the federal government conducts a census — typically in early spring, meaning that 2010 Census forms should be in our mailboxes in a matter of a few weeks or days. Advance letters for the 2010 Census have probably already landed in a lot of mailboxes around the country. The federal government’s conducting a census is Constitutional, but in the words of Ron Paul — as is often the case, 
TrackBack URI for this entry
Subscribe to this comment's feed |
I agree The census should be prophited from asking personal intrusive questions like the number of guns you own or if youve ever abused your child we dont need big brother sticking in his snooping nose |
Andrew
said:
 |
... "It will be locked away for 72 years, and not made available to other agencies." So...they are going to collect this information, and lock it away for 72 years...for NO ONE to access...for ANY reason...? Then why go through all of the trouble of storing it anyway? Oh yeah: "But as Dr. Paul observes, information from a census was used during World War II to locate Japanese Americans; it was used during the Vietnam War era to find those who refused military conscription; it has been used by the IRS to detect tax evaders." But since inter-agency sharing is forbidden, i'm guessing it was all those data entry clerks that rounded up Japanese-Americans, draft-dodgers, and tax evaders. Information is power. And power held but not used is useless, therefore, it WILL be used for something...by someone...somewhere. By the Supreme Law of the Land, the only question you need answer is "How many people live at this address as of this date?" All other information given is voluntary, give it out if you wish. |
Bonnie
said:
 |
The beginnings of Constitutional infringement started early on "The actual Enumeration shall be made within three Years after the first Meeting of the Congress of the United States, and within every subsequent Term of ten Years, in such Manner as they shall by Law direct." - found in Article I, Section 2, Clause 3 Nothing in the Constitution indicates anything other than a simple enumeration. enumeration - to ascertain the number of; count To show how quickly the attacks on the Constitution began, even the VERY FIRST CENSUS conducted in 1790 went beyond a simple enumeration (albeit, it was very mild by today's standards). |
ChrisCZ
said:
 |
I agree with Ron Paul on NO to Census questions Census was made for one reason only (look it up). They want more information just to have more excuses to go do more things, which causes the government to get bigger, which causes higher taxes and debt. The purpose of the census is NOT for a QuestionAmerica Survey for Uncle Sam, even though they bend over backwards to get you to think so. This is a perfect example of when we need to say NO to the government bureaucracy wanting more information so it can just have excuses to grow. Plus, the census numbers will be heavily skewed to areas with lots of illegal aliens, which means those areas will get more congressional representatives (and funds for schools, highways, health facilities, if you believe the census letter I'm reading from). |
Mary A
said:
 |
... I see no where on the form a place for my signature or any language that says I must tell the truth under penalty of law. Is this correct? |
wayne
said:
 |
believe in the federal government Thomas Jefferson warned us! Might be time to start listening to Jefferson. |
Brian C1234
said:
 |
Information If the government wants information from the census it just requires the government to write another law that supersedes that one. |
Big D
said:
 |
What Census Information? I burned the first one and mysteriously a lady showed up on my private property trying to ask me personal questions. Who I work for, how much money I make and a series of other questions. My answer is 4 people live here and I will go as far as 2 adults and 2 minors under the age of 18. By the way do illegal aliens actually give credit towards representation? Should use the registered voter logs from the towns to determine representation that is my feeling. Who is going to write this bill? 5,000$ fine for not conforming and 500$ for giving false information. Since I believe in being green my snail mail goes directly from my post box to my wood stove to keep my family warm. Probably a question in there asking me if I do this..... |
