A judge on Texas’ highest criminal court is facing a special hearing before the state’s Commission on Judicial Conduct after allegedly refusing to accept a last-minute appeal from a man on death row in September of 2007. If found guilty, she could be removed from her position.

Sharon Keller, sometimes called Sharon “Killer” for her tough attitude on crime, is accused of instructing the clerk’s office to close at 5 p.m. even though she had received a phone call from the defendant's lawyer requesting more time to file the appeal. Computer problems supposedly prevented the public defender from submitting the necessary documents on time to delay the execution, so the defendant, Michael Richard, was executed by lethal injection later that night. He was convicted of the rape and murder of a nurse in Houston over 20 years ago.

The United States Supreme Court had decided that morning to review a case dealing with the constitutionality of lethal injections, but Judge Keller apparently needed to leave early to meet with a repair man. So when the lawyer called at 4:45 p.m. asking if the clerk’s office could stay open late to accept the appeal, she said no.

In her defense, Keller argues that the appeal could have been filed with another judge who may have known about the case. She also wrote in a deposition that “if there had been some comment about computer problems I would have started thinking in a different direction.”

Her lawyer claims Keller was responding to an administrative question about keeping the clerk’s office open, not whether the death-row inmate could file an appeal after hours, which is normally allowed. “This whole case is about the confusion between the word court and clerk,” he claimed.

Judge Keller gained notoriety — and picked up her nickname — in 1998 after refusing to grant a new trial for a mentally disabled man who was convicted of rape, even after DNA evidence revealed that the semen in the victim was not his. “We can’t give new trials to everyone who establishes, after conviction, that they might be innocent,” she said on television, adding that finality in the criminal justice system is important.

Critics, opponents of the death penalty, and the executed man’s family have blasted the judge and her alleged decision to close the court and refuse the appeal. “At 8.23pm they pronounced him dead,” the executed man’s sister told ABC News. “Myself and the family only blamed one person and that's Sharon Keller." His brother-in-law added that “even the guilty are protected by the United States Constitution."

"President Clinton was impeached for lying about his sex life,“ noted Lou Burnam, a Democratic legislator in Texas who pushed for punishing Keller. “This woman walked off the job and it resulted in the death of somebody.” 

The special prosecutor appointed to pursue the judge for the state judicial commission, Mike McKetta, said, “When the government has a death penalty, it is essential that there be not the perception but the reality that it is administered error-free.” The commission charged Keller with willful or persistent conduct that cast public discredit on the judiciary, among other things.

The drama continued Wednesday with Keller offering more than an hour's worth of testimony. She is the highest ranking judge ever to be put on trial by the state’s Commission on Judicial Conduct. If found guilty, she will likely be removed from her seat as the presiding judge on the court, or even be removed as a judge entirely.

Photo: AP Images
 

TrackBack URI for this entry

Comments (5)

Subscribe to this comment's feed

Epicurus said:

Can't happen fast enough Wonder if the clerk's office will stay open long enough for this hag to file HER appeal. What a disgrace. Texas, come join the 21st century, please....

August 20, 2009

WestWright said:

The Judge did her job, leave her alone! Stop the stupidity, the executed murderer Michael Wayne Richard, admitted his guilt, the evidence was preponderant and he turned down a Life Sentence Plea...in 1987and finally got his just reward when executed by lethal injection, September 2007 in Huntsville, Texas for the rape, robbery, and murder of a woman in her home. On the afternoon of 18 August 1986, Richard, then 26, was in front of the Hockley home of Marguerite Dixon, 53. Richard approached Dixon's son, Albert, and asked if the van parked in the driveway was for sale. When Albert Dixon told him the van belonged to his brother who was out of town, Richard left. A few minutes later, Richard saw Albert and his sister, Paula, leave the property. Richard then entered Mrs. Dixon's home. He forced her into a bedroom, where he raped her. The then shot her in the head with a .25-caliber pistol. He then stole two televisions and the van. Mrs. Dixon's children returned home that evening. They found the sliding-glass door open and all the lights turned off. After calling a neighbor for assistance, they entered the house and discovered their mother dead in her bedroom. Richard hotwired the van and drove it to Houston. He traded the murder weapon to a friend for cocaine and attempted to sell the televisions. He then drove the van to another home, where it broke down. He told the homeowner, a friend of his, that he would return for the van, but he never did. The homeowner called a wrecker the next morning to take the van away. When it was discovered that the van had been hotwired and stripped, the police were called. After interviewing the homeowner and the man to whom Richard had tried to sell the televisions, the police obtained an arrest warrant for Richard. He was arrested at his mother's home the next evening....more : http://www.txexecutions.org/default.asp

August 20, 2009

Peter said:

... Leave the woman alone. He was a convicted killer. He had has appeals. His lawyers should have made sure they filed the appeal on time. Why should the court stay open late for a convicted killer and waste more of my tax money. His victims did not have the right to appeal. We need more judges like her

August 20, 2009

GatorBud said:

Private Citizen After 20 years of appeals he still needed more time? I believe justice was finally served.

August 20, 2009

Justin said:

Only one person to blame? His brother in law said they have only one person to blame...how about blame Michael Richards himself. This guy was convicted of burglury in 1978, service 3yrs of a 6yr sentence released in 1981, in 1985 was convicted of auto theft, theft, and forgery, served 6 months of a 5yr sentence!!! His finger prints were found on the door and he confessed to the killing, but claimed the gun went off by accident. Whatever, Satan is his boy now.

August 21, 2009