Some ads are provided by Google
They are not endorsed by The New American
| Homeland Security Loses Nearly 300 Firearms | | Print | |
| Written by James Heiser |
| Friday, 19 February 2010 09:00 |
|
According to a USA Today article, The nation's Homeland Security officers lost nearly 200 guns in bowling alleys, public restrooms, unlocked cars and other unsecure areas, with some ending up in the hands of felons. The problem, outlined in a new federal report, has prompted disciplinary actions and extra training. The report lends itself to some obvious questions,such as, “How do you forget to take your firearm with you when you leave the restroom?,” and, “How do you ‘misplace’ a shotgun?” The fact is that presumably virtually all of these weapons are now in the hands of criminals, since honest citizens do not simply take home a Glock or Beretta they find lying around like it was loose change found in the middle of the street. Furthermore, the relatively short time frame for losing track of 289 firearms leaves one wondering what the ongoing rate of loss—and the total losses since the formation of the DHS on November 25, 2002—actually might be. Homeland Security "took immediate action" to correct problems, department spokeswoman Amy Kudwa said Wednesday. Workers are getting extra training and officials are improving tracking and inspection of guns, Kudwa said. But one may justifiably ask how it could be that DHS was doing such a sloppy job keeping track of firearms before this study was conducted. For an agency that has more guns than it has employees — 190,000 firearms for 185,000 people on the payroll — the notion that controls were sufficiently loose to irretrievably lose track of nearly 300 firearms is unacceptable. Furthermore, one wonders how many weapons were lost, and then later recovered, and thus not included in the statistics cited above. Photo of Secretary of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano: AP Images Trackback(0)
Comments (0)
![]() Write comment
This content has been locked. You can no longer post any comment.
|





According to its 

