It could be argued that the single biggest contributor to President Barack Obama’s election victory was voter dissatisfaction with former President Bush’s neoconservative warmongering foreign policy (which was embraced by Republican presidential candidate John McCain). Ironically, since taking office, Obama has turned out to be eerily similar in the warmongering department.

One of Obama’s first foreign policy decisions as the commander-in-chief was to copy Bush’s Iraq troop “surge” with a surge of his own in Afghanistan. The U.S. troop presence has drastically increased from 32,000 at the start of 2009 to about 57,000 presently with an anticipated cap around the 68,000 mark (which would more than double the U.S. commitment to the region). Like the salesman on a late-night infomercial typically proclaims, “But wait — there’s more!” Defense Secretary Robert Gates announced that the number of boots on the ground could climb even beyond the 68,000 number. In a question and answer session at Fort Drum, Gates said that what U.S. General Stanley McChrystal, who was recently appointed as the new commander of NATO, reports back to him could influence the decision to send even more troops to war. McChrystal is preparing a classified report for the Defense Secretary on Afghanistan according to CNN.

McChrystal is expected to complete a classified report for Gates by the end of this month, assessing where the war stands, and what needs to be done. He will tell Gates whether he needs more U.S. troops to fight the escalating conflict, according to a senior U.S. military official.… The review is also expected to recommend that the number of Afghan troops be increased beyond the goal of 134,000, other military sources said.

McChrystal is already seeking to increase troop levels there by pleading with the British to send more troops. McChrystal also stated that the conflict shows no sign of coming to a near halt. “It will go on until we achieve the progress we want to achieve…. It won't be short.” The British casualties in Afghanistan recently just climbed above the number of those who died in the Iraq conflict. Things continue to deteriorate in the region where attacks are up 70 percent over last year. Unlike in America where the marital woes of the stars of Jon & Kate Plus Eight dominate the headlines, in the U.K., the rising death toll and grim analysis of prospects for success have generated controversy and debate over British participation in the war. Such a dialogue has alarmed the Obama administration, which fears the same might happen in the United States, according to the Financial Times.

Britain's increasingly heated debate about its role in Afghanistan has sparked concern in Washington about the sustainability of the military strategy and the US public's own willingness to commit troops for the long term, senior officials and analysts say.… A senior US official told the Financial Times that there was "some level of anxiety" within Barack Obama's administration about the UK debate. "It's hard to see our most capable partner struggling in this debate…. If we are going to have to backfill European countries that decide to leave, could we sustain that with US public opinion? That's an open question."

Unfortunately for our brave men and women in the U.S. armed forces, the current administration seems more concerned with public opinion polls than preventing U.S. casualties in an unnecessary and unconstitutional nation building project. The Associated Press reports that Obama’s surge is already proving very deadly.

July is shaping up as the deadliest month of the Afghan war for U.S.-led international forces, with the number killed already matching the highest full-month toll of the nearly eight-year conflict…. As of Wednesday, at least 46 international troops, including 24 Americans, had been killed in Afghanistan this month…. That matches the tolls for the two previous deadliest months — June and August of 2008. The rate of deaths in July — about three a day — is approaching some of the highest levels of the Iraq war. [Emphasis added.]

One has to wonder how long it will take the American public to wake up from their mainstream media-induced slumber to recognize that the man sold to them as a peace candidate is turning out to be just as bad of a warmonger, if not worse, than his much-maligned predecessor.

Photo: AP Images

TrackBack URI for this entry

Comments (8)

Subscribe to this comment's feed

bg said:

... And now we have the very brave Private First Class Bowe Bergdahl held captive by the Afghan militants. It is heart rending to see the video made by his captors and my thoughts and prayers go out to his family. We have courageous soldiers fighting on foreign lands for a larger part of a decade.

July 20, 2009

Danny said:

USA empire surges into Afghan quagmire Obama--like most Dems--did not oppose the Iraq war, just the operational fiasco. So it's no surprise that he would follow Wall Street's instructions to escalate the killing fields in AfPak. When will the American Public wake up to the reality of an Imperial Occupation in Afghanistan? Sad to say, but Obama's blind acceptance of a Bushed foreign policy will bind him to the Operation Enduring Fiefdom!

July 23, 2009

Lokis said:

Brave soldiers? Armed goons more like it........ the Psychos in the US Brit and Canadian forces are little more than trained thugs - If they were really brave they would shove their orders up OBama's backside - let us pray that no more of ANYONE dies in this clusterf**k - support our troops - bring 'em home - just don't let them be cops!

July 23, 2009

tski said:

... Unfortunately the opium crazed terrorists won't just melt away if this confict isn't dealt with.. and "the troops brought home" They proved that when they hijacked those planes and hit the WTC. Some limp wristed spineless cowards here in the UK may be whining about casulties.. But running (or advocating it)in the face of the enemy is a far bigger sin. Those on both sides who whine for the return of the troops with only half a job done, i can only assume are happy to contemplate US/UK schools, hospitals, buses, aircraft and any other soft target being bombed at the hands of those who openly claim a desire to the west in ruins?

July 23, 2009 | url

Holocaust Gaza said:

They couldn't vote for health care today... ...but they voted for adding 30.000 troops to the US army.

July 24, 2009

DoucheyDoo said:

TSKI is way, way off You are very misled, Tski... Most people the west consider "terrorists" are against the use of opium (they are Muslim) and opium traffic in Afghanistan has only increased since the US occupation. A quagmire in Iraq and Afghanistan will not make us safer in the U.S. Remember, NOT ONE of the 911 hijackers were from Iraq, Afghanistan or Iran (the majority were Saudis, the rest were Egyptians...ALLIES of the US)...The whole thing is a scam.

July 24, 2009

Powers said:

This was foreshadowed by a former Obama advisor and CFR VP This was foreshadowed a few months ago by Lawrence Korb, one of Obama's foreign policy advisors during his campaign, at a speech in Pittsburgh. Korb is also the former VP of the CFR, former Raytheon exec. Check it out... Former Obama Advisor and CFR VP says 100,000+ Troops, 10+ more years needed in Afghanistan http://www.theendrun.com/2009/former-obama-advisor-and-cfr-vp-says-100000-troops-needed/ That's from March.

July 24, 2009 | url

Tony Wicher said:

... I was just wondering how many people who frequent this web site share my view that 9/11 was engineered by the Bush administration for the purpose of having an endless, Orwellian "War on Terror" that would justify military actions, undeclared wars, black ops, psy ops and covert actions and gigantic military budgets into the indefinite future. The current escalation in Afghanistan is of a piece with this policy. Tony Wicher Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth ae911truth.org

August 05, 2009