U.S. Headlines
- Bill Authorizes Use of Unmanned Drones in U.S. Airspace
- Reid Poised to Introduce Yet Another Internet Bill
- Regulatory Agencies Continue to Slow the Economy
- Federal Court Rules Against Traditional Marriage in California
- Congress Probes “Green Energy” Loans, Wasted “Stimulus”
- Former Congresswoman Regrets ObamaCare Vote; Unaware of Contraceptive Mandate
Some ads are provided by Google
They are not endorsed by The New American
| Terror Book Author Wins Round #1 in Censorship Battle | | Print | |
| Written by William F. Jasper | ||
| Wednesday, 17 June 2009 16:05 | ||
|
As noted here in our previous post on June 15, in October 2007, U.S. Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald threatened to sue author Peter Lance and his publisher, HarperCollins, for defamation unless the publisher ceased publication and distribution, issued a public retraction of the book's allegations about Fitzpatrick, and agreed to refrain from publishing a scheduled updated edition of the book. Following an extensive, 18-month process of re-vetting the evidence in Lance's book, HarperCollins decided to go ahead with publication of the updated version of Triple Cross. As you'll see from the thirty-two (32) pages of letters sent by Mr. Fitzgerald from October 2007 to June 2009, he has attempted to use the authority of his office to intimidate me and my publisher; threatening repeatedly to sue for defamation and other relief if we did not stop publication of the book, which was critical of Mr. Fitzgerald's performance in office. On November 16, 2007, Fitzgerald sent HarperCollins a 16-page "demand" letter, using the fax machine of the U.S. Attorney office in Chicago. "I believe," Lance says in his complaint, "that Mr. Fitzgerald's intent in using Dept. of Justice resources to send a letter purporting to press his personal claim, was a clear attempt to intimidate me and chill my publisher." Photo of Peter Lance: Jim Capo Related articles: Trackback(0)
Comments (1)
![]()
Mike123
said:
|
|
... We are told Mohamed took part in terrorist attacks which targeted Americans. People were murdered in these attacks. So why would an al Qaeda mole be given a deal to join the Federal Witness Relocation Program? Did Soviet/Russian mole Robert Hannsen get a similar deal? Did Mohamed truly fool the FBI, CIA, SDNY and US special forces for years? Does that make any sense at all? |





In spite of a 20-month campaign of intimidation by one of the most powerful prosecutors in America, author Peter Lance has succeeded in getting the updated edition of Triple Cross, his book on the 9/11 terrorist attacks, released to the public. Originally published in 2006, 

