A federal district court held last Wednesday that the federal government generally and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers specifically were culpably negligent in the failure of Corps-constructed levees to withstand the rising tide caused by the landfall of Hurricane Katrina on August 29, 2005.

For years since the devastating flooding that completely inundated the more coastal and poorer segments of New Orleans, many have accused the Army Corps of Engineers of failing to properly build, maintain, and repair the levees designed to protect the Crescent City from precisely the sort of deadly effects that result from a sea surge that would predictably accompany a storm of the magnitude of Hurricane Katrina.

“It has been proven in a court of law that the drowning of New Orleans was not a natural disaster, but a preventable man-made travesty,” declared a spokesman for the lawyers who filed suit against the Corps of Engineers on behalf of the named plaintiffs they represent: three homeowners and one business owner who were displaced and whose property was ruined by the uncontrollable floodwaters.

According to the ruling handed down on November 18 by Clinton-appointed U.S. District Court Judge Stanwood Duval of the Eastern District of Louisiana, “The Corps’ lassitude and failure to fulfill its duties resulted in a catastrophic loss of human life and property in unprecedented proportions.” He further held that the Corps knew as early as 1988 that the deplorable condition of the levees posed a recognizable and preventable threat to people living in the low-lying areas in and around New Orleans, but remarkably and negligently did nothing to ameliorate the situation or strengthen the levees.

The judgment ordered the government to pay $720,000 to the plaintiffs, which will amount to a thimble of water in the Gulf of Mexico compared to the hundreds of lawsuits that are sure to be filed as a result of this successful litigation. Experts estimate that there are some 100,000 legal complaints ready to be filed against the government claiming recompensable damage caused by the broken levees.

Predictably, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is expected to appeal the ruling. A spokesman for the Corps declined to comment on the record as that would be inadvisable considering that the “issues involved in the case are still subject to possible further litigation.”

Based on the unequivocal language in last Wednesday’s ruling, the government can certainly remove the qualifier “possible” from that statement, for there is sure to be a torrent of filings in the next few months. Nothing, it seems, would delight New Orleans Mayor Ray Nagin more. “Hopefully this ruling will open up the flood gates, if you will, for those people to receive proper compensation,” he said Wednesday after learning of the decision. In fact, Mayor Nagin said that the city of New Orleans itself would very soon join the line at the court clerk’s office and file a tort claim seeking recovery of damages it suffered as a result of the Corps’ negligence.

Photo of breached levee: AP Images
 

TrackBack URI for this entry

Comments (4)

Subscribe to this comment's feed

Sandy Rosenthal said:

	We were all in the same bathtub Thank you for writing about this important ruling. But it is not true that the flooding "completely inundated the more coastal and poorer segments of New Orleans." The flooding caused by the Corps of Engineers engineering mistakes was an equal opportunity destroyer. We were all in the same bathtub.
	report abuse vote down vote up

November 23, 2009 | url
Votes: +2

Editilla~New Orleans Ladder said:

You something out in your bias against Ray Nagin Thank you for covering this historic Defective Product Liability Case against the Corps of Engineers. It is very important for the American Taxpayers to understand that they have been sold a False Bill of Goods by the US Army Corps of Engineers. One can see the results their negligent engineering evidenced in stories across the country, from failed levees in WA to flooding in GA, to dredging the Delaware River, to the Midwest Floods fiasco of 2008, to the Trinity River Project in downtown Dallas. The Corps is "Everywhere you want to be," --45 states, 54% of the counties in the nation to be precise. http://levees.org/2009/09/30/n...-flooding/ I do appreciate you bringing this out for the people to ponder. However, in you thinly veiled bias against our fumbling mayor (preaching to a choir member here), you left out some of the other extra-legal plaintiffs, to wit: the Sewage and Water Board and the corporation with a monopoly on Louisiana Utilities: Entergy. Both have lined up for nearly half a billion dollars. I am hoping though that you can cite your source for Nagin's statements from Wednesday that "the city of New Orleans itself would very soon join the line at the court clerk’s office and file a tort claim seeking recovery of damages it suffered as a result of the Corps’ negligence." I missed that somehow. Please cite your sources. If I have learned to expect anything from Birchers it is your critiques of and quests for Accuracy in Media. Thank you again

report abuse vote down vote up

November 24, 2009 | url
Votes: +1

Antone P. Braga said:

	Response Do you have a moment to look over important disaster information? US President Obama did. Are You Disaster Ready (hurricane, tornado, earthquake, flood, fire, etc.)? http://www.disasterprepared.net
	report abuse vote down vote up

November 30, 2009 | url
Votes: +0

laurie said:

... This ruling could benefit thousands of Hurricane Katrina victims. Some media reports have said plaintiffs' lawyers are urging the U.S. government to settle. There is information here on who would be eligible to file a MRGO lawsuit here. http://www.yourlawyer.com/topics/overview/MRGO-Flood-Lawsuit Basically, you need to live in one of nine Louisiana zip codes, and have filed an SF Form 95 claims with the Army Corps of Engineers within a specific time frame.

report abuse vote down vote up

November 30, 2009
Votes: +0