World Headlines
- Egyptian Government May Prosecute Foreign Activists
- Is It Nuts to Let Iran Go Nuclear?
- Members of European Parliament Preach Austerity, Practice Luxury
- Russia, China Block UN Vote on Syria Regime Change
- Cartels Targeting Police in Ciudad Juárez
- International Monetary Fund (IMF) Leader Calls for Trillion-dollar "Firewall"
Some ads are provided by Google
They are not endorsed by The New American
| Senator Webb's Visit to Myanmar (Burma) | | Print | |
| Written by Warren Mass | ||||||||||||
| Wednesday, 19 August 2009 14:56 | ||||||||||||
|
"When I returned to Bangkok from Myanmar I raised my view at that time, with respect to the issues in Myanmar, that the Chinese government should step forward and show leadership in assisting in solving that situation, and they have not done that yet," said Webb. Burma's military junta says the country is not ready to accept foreign aid workers, amid mounting criticism of its response to the devastating cyclone. Burma is one of countless examples of what happens to a people burdened by too much totalitarian government. The presence of total government is always a humanitarian disaster. Trackback(0)
Comments (6)
![]()
will
said:
|
|
... It seems to me this senator is so proud to meet Than Shwe and able to negotiate for the release of Yet Taw, but he did not realize what is initial intention of Burmese junta. The junta did not have a plan to press charge Mr Yet Taw at the beginning and looking the way to release him after he was sentenced for 7 years in prison. Now they have a good chance to release him. More over the show junta is running is quite smooth as they encouraged Mr Yet Taw to enter Ms Aung San Suu Kyi House through the Burmese spy who he met in Measot, Thailand and they can put Ms Aung San Suu Kyi away from the so-called election as a result. What Senator Webb managed to do for the people of Burma and for democracy and Human rights for the country during his trip? nothing.... His voice is louder than what he did, well nothing about democratization and human rights abused in the country. It is not so surprised to me that Than Shwe welcome people like Mr Webb who keep mouth shut on those issues. Enjoy your trip with US Tax Payer money, Mr Webb |
Myint Lwin
said:
|
Aung San Suu Kyi never elected in any elections held in Myanmar Aung San Suu Kyi never elected in any elections held in Myanmar More specifically and importantly what most people do not realize is that in many instances Ms. Suu Kyi is erroneously referred to as an elected person or in some instances as an Elected President or elected Prime Minister. Actually, Ms. Suu Kyi never stood for the election because she was not eligible to contest a seat. It was not this present military government or the previous socialist government that refused Ms. Suu Kyi the right to stand for elections but ironically it was her own father, Myanmar national hero General Aung San, who wrote into the original constitution, subsequently promulgated in 1948, a clause with the provision that "any person who is under any acknowledgement of allegiance or adherence to a foreign power, or a subject or citizen is entitled to the rights and privileges of a subject or citizen of a foreign power." Thus she is not entitled to contest a seat in the country's elections. Ms. Suu Kyi resided abroad for twenty-eight years and married an Englishman (Giving her the rights to U.K. citizenship) and has 2 children both holding British citizenship. This present military government has to, as all the previous successive Myanmar Governments did, continue to honour this clause and the present national convention has also committed itself to continue to honour the said clause. This type of constitutional condition is implemented by many governments including those of developed nations such as Australia, India, Singapore, Malaysia. It is quite understandable that Governments do not wish to have someone in office who could be unduly influenced by any other nation or power. As a preventive measure certain rules and regulations are universally drawn up and put into effect to serve as a mechanism to protect the national security as well as the national interest of the respective countries. to be continued |
Myint Lwin
said:
|
Aung San Suu Kyi never elected in any elections held in Myanmar While under house restriction the Government of Myanmar consented to Ms. Suu Kyi's request to contest the election representing Bahan Township Constituency (1) and her name was enrolled on 2nd December 1989. Objections were lodged by various individuals and political parties against the permission granted to Ms. Suu Kyi to contest the forthcoming elections with reference to the provisions of the Election Law of 1989. Legally, granting Ms. Suu Kyi the right to contest the election was found to violate and contravene the following 3 articles. (1) Section (8-b) "Law for people residing in the Union of Myanmar." (Ms. Suu Kyi has given her permanent address where she resides with her husband Dr.Michael Aris and 2 sons at 15, Park Town, Oxford, in United Kingdom. Ms. Suu Kyi's name has not been registered at her mother's residence in Yangon which indicates that she is not a permanent resident of Myanmar.) (2) Section (10-e). " Persons who are under any acknowledgement of allegiance or adherence to a foreign power, or are subjects or citizens or entitled to the rights and privileges of a subject or a citizen of a foreign Power." (Ms. Suu Kyi enjoys the right to reside in U.K. indefinitely. Apart from the right to vote, she enjoys all the other privileges of a British Citizen.) (3) Section (10-h)." Members of organization in armed revolt against the State, persons against whom there is sufficient grounds of having links with the said organization or with its members to revolt." (Ms.Suu Kyi was found to be communicating, collaborating and harbouring a member of the armed terrorist group and this terrorist was arrested in her residential compound in Yangon together with substantial evidence. Due to the above mentioned factors Ms. Suu Kyi was found ineligible to contest the 1990 elections. |
Myint Lwin
said:
|
Sanctions Won't Works Economic sanctions have adverse effects on democratic process of Myanmar, and the drive to inculcate the people with a democratic sense and expedite the democratization. If the our nation lags behind other countries in economic development, the rate of cognitive development of the public will be slow. If all what the people understand regarding democracy is that the decision of the majority is always right, without realizing the real context of democracy, the nation will lead to mobocracy, in which the people decide on cases according to mob rules, and to anarchy. Then, why are hardliners in the West Bloc, Myanmar renegades and local anti-government groups supporting economic sanctions, and calling for renewal and tightening the economic sanctions against Myanmar. They seem to assume that economic sanctions is the only way to show their dissatisfaction, put pressure and punish the government. I wonder whether they know economic sanctions have adverse effects and why they persist in doing so, turning a blind eye to the truth. Anyhow, many of the westerners know the evil consequences of economic sanctions and assume that it is important to boost relations with the Myanmar government. One of them is US Senator Mr Jim Webb, who recently visited Myanmar. |
Myint Lwin
said:
|
The foundation for friendship and building trust in future Senator Jim Webb paid a visit to Myanmar in 2001. He strongly believes that it is required to strengthen the relations with the Myanmar government. The book “A Time to Fight: Reclaiming a Fair and Just America” he published last year recalls his visit to Myanmar in 2001 and a comment that the US trade embargo further deepens and worsens the isolation of Myanmar. He added that prior to his tour of ASEAN, the US State Department did not give any instructions to Senator Webb, but they both shared the same view; and that Mr Webb’s visit would yield fruits if it was a way to make Myanmar authorities know the views and attitude of the US government. Actually, Senator Jim Webb’s visit was positive and fruitful one to improve the bilateral relations. In his announcement, Mr Webb said that that was the first meeting between a US top political official and Myanmar authorities in many years; that he thanked the Myanmar government for complying with his request that the Myanmar government send back Mr Yettaw and allow him to meet with Daw Aung San Suu Kyi; and that he hoped that the compliances with his requests could be a way to pave the foundation for friendship and building trust in future. |
James V. Mottley
said:
|
US Senior Citizen - Veteran Korean Period There are Problems inthe US that need to be handled by our High Leval Representative and Senators like Senator Webb but instead like President Obamar they fly all ovewr the World Making themselves FAmous using US Tax Payers money & Call themeslves Great Americans - while neglecting their US Citizens and not even responding to the Request of the people that pay the bill with TAxes --- shame shame shame Once elected our Senators and Representative become HIGH AND POWERFUL IN THIER OWN RIGHT & HAVE LITTLE RESPECT FOR THEIR VERY OWN US CITIZENS James V. Mottley - SENIOR CITIZEN - VOTER - VETREAN mY SUCCESTIONS IS LETS GET THEM OUT OF OFFICE AND BEGIN TO LOOK AFTER OUR OWN COUNTRY -- AND NOT TAKE AWAY FROM OUR OWN CITIZEN Falls Church, VA |





Speaking at a press conference in Hanoi, Vietnam, on August 19, U.S. Senator Jim Webb (D-Va.) commented on his recent visit to Myanmar, the Southeast Asian nation formerly called Burma.

