President Barack Obama made his first visit international trip as president on February 19, as he made a seven-hour visit to Canada’s capital city of Ottawa. The U.S. president was honored by a double line of Royal Canadian Mounted Police at Ottawa’s airport and was welcomed by Canada’s governor general, Michaëlle Jean, who escorted him inside the terminal. The governor general is the representative of Britain's Queen Elizabeth II in Canada.

Most of Obama’s discussions, however, took part with Canada’s head of government, Prime Minister Stephen Harper.

While the two leaders touched briefly on issues such as both nations’ roles in Afghanistan, environmental regulations related to Canadian extraction of oil from tar sand, and border security, trade policies dominated their discussions.

During his visit, the U.S. president sought to reassure Canadians that the “Buy American” clause in the $787 billion U.S. economic recovery plan would not threaten free trade. “I provided Prime Minister Harper an assurance that I want to grow trade and not contract it,” Obama said on Ottawa’s Parliament Hill. “I don’t think that there was anything in the recovery package that is adverse to that goal.” AFP reported that the clause originally restricted infrastructure projects outlined in the massive plan to using only U.S.-made materials. However, the limitations were later watered down to comply with U.S. treaty obligations.

In response to Obama’s statement, Harper said: “We expect the United States to adhere to its international obligations. I have every expectation, based on what the president's told me and what he said publicly many times in the past, that the United States will do just that.” However, in a follow-up comment about the U.S. stimulus program, Harper added a pointed caveat: “If we pursue stimulus packages, the goal of which is only to benefit ourselves ... we will deepen the world recession, not solve it.”

One area where Obama tread lightly was the possibility of renegotiating parts of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), which includes the United States, Canada, and Mexico. Such revamping of NAFTA was part of Obama’s 2008 election platform.

While indicating that he was still willing to strengthen labor and environmental standards in the pact, he gave no sign that he would push for quick changes. “My hope is that ... there's a way of doing this that is not disruptive to the extraordinarily important trade relationships that exist between the United States and Canada,” he said.

Harper also seemed to address the issue of renegotiating NAFTA cautiously: “We can address some of these concerns, which I understand, without, you know, opening the whole NAFTA and unraveling what is a very complex agreement.”

NAFTA was approved by Congress and signed into law by President Bill Clinton in 1993. At the time, former U.S. Secretary of State Henry Kissinger said that the agreement was “the architecture of a new international system.” Kissinger also labeled NAFTA as “the most creative step toward a new world order since the end of the Cold War."

While NAFTA is generally referred to by its supporters as a “free trade” agreement, Prime Minister Harper just identified it as “a very complex agreement.” Which is an accurate description of the mammoth 1,700-page agreement that created some 33 new international commissions, committees, secretariats, and sub-groups to oversee North American trade.

Since freedom, in its classic sense, is generally the by-product of a minimum of governmental regulation, true free trade would leave entrepreneurs free to conduct business in the best interests of themselves and their customers — governed only by natural market forces. Therefore, a so-called free-trade agreement that is identified as “very complex,” seems like something of an oxymoron.

The North American Free Trade Agreement in reality has little to do with genuine free trade and a great deal to do with economic consolidation and eventual political union. Anyone who wants to see where NAFTA will eventually lead needs only to look at Europe. A series of NAFTA-like agreements (the European Coal and Steel Community, the Common Market, the European Atomic Community and the European Community) eventually led to the formation of the European Union. With its own flag, anthem, Parliament, court, currency, and embassies, the EU is rendering national sovereignty for its member nations a thing of the past.

During the campaign, Obama's statement that he wanted to renegotiate NAFTA was interpreted by many Americans to mean that he wanted to move away from the agreement. But just the opposite is the case: by reforming NAFTA to include environmental and labor regualtions, the result would strengthening the super-national entity that was intended from the beginning to provide the foundation for a North American Union. Despite the fact that President Obama and Prime Minister Harper both seem reluctant to disturb NAFTA very much at present, future discussion among the leaders of the three North American countries, and where those discussion might lead, bear close watching.

TrackBack URI for this entry

Comments (3)

Subscribe to this comment's feed

Paul Sammon said:

SCRAP the COMMUNIST "free trade" agreement "NAFTA" Ever since 1993, when Slick Willie's adminstration enacted NAFTA what good has come from it? The only ones who benefit are the one-world globalists and their multi-national corporations who can get a greater pool of slave or near slave labor so that their profits are greater. Communists ever since at least the days of Vladimir Lenin have advocated "free trade". Tell me GLOBALIST POND SCUM! Has this benefited the average business owner or American citizen even one bit? Nope, but you might get your produce slightly cheaper or be flooded with more cheap Chinese goods or tainted toys. NAFTA has also made the illegal immigration problem worse by forcing millions of Mexican farmers off their land to go(you guessed it, the USA). A revision of NAFTA makes as much sense as a "reform" of the UN or a hole in the head. All of these items have one things in common-GET RID OF THEM ALL!

report abuse vote down vote up

February 22, 2009
Votes: +2

Flu-Bird said:

	Repeal NAFTA Its time to have NAFTA repealed and the NAFTA SUPER HIGHWAYS shut down its time to oppose the sinster NAU plans of the sinsiter CFR
	report abuse vote down vote up

February 23, 2009
Votes: +0

Obama is a fraud and liar said:

Canadians want their sovereignty Sovereignty is something that most Canadians don't think they'll ever lose and when the loss of our sovereignty is disguised and discussed with vales of secrecy and disguised by names such as NAFTA and Super Highways we'll lose it without realizing it. Since our news papers are owned by Bilderberg attendees they're doing everything in their power to hide this vulturous deceit and it's about bloody time we wake up as a nation and say "NO! No, to the North America Union and all that accompanies it". Obama is worse then Bush ever was because Obama can hide behind his slogans, rhetoric, his mass of zombified supporters and his own race without anyone daring to defy him because to defy Obama is defy "the new savior". Obama has lied about everything he promised on the campaign trail, he promised to bring the troops back home day one, then he said he'll look at it in six months, then nine months and now it's 24 months. Obama has only expanded everything Bush was doing and his supporters still think he's the messiah come to save them. When are people going to wake up to the fact that both parties are owned by the same team? We need a revolution!!

report abuse vote down vote up

February 24, 2009 | url
Votes: +1