Monday, 04 June 2012 04:25

Alabama Adopts First Official State Ban on UN Agenda 21

Written by 

Alabama became the first state to adopt a tough law protecting private property and due process by prohibiting any government involvement with or participation in a controversial United Nations scheme known as Agenda 21. Activists from across the political spectrum celebrated the measure’s approval as a significant victory against the UN “sustainability” plot, expressing hope that similar sovereignty-preserving measures would be adopted in other states as the nationwide battle heats up.  

The Alabama Senate Bill (SB) 477 legislation, known unofficially among some supporters as the “Due Process for Property Rights” Act, was approved unanimously by both the state House and Senate. After hesitating for a few days, late last month Republican Governor Robert Bentley finally signed into law the wildly popular measure — but only after heavy pressure from activists forced his hand. 

Virtually no mention of the law was made in the establishment press. But analysts said the measure was likely the strongest protection against the UN scheme passed anywhere in America so far. The law, aimed at protecting private property rights, specifically prevents all state agencies and local governments in Alabama from participating in the global scheme in any way. 

"The State of Alabama and all political subdivisions may not adopt or implement policy recommendations that deliberately or inadvertently infringe or restrict private property rights without due process, as may be required by policy recommendations originating in, or traceable to 'Agenda 21,' " the law states, adding a brief background on the UN plan hatched at the 1992 “Earth Summit” in Rio de Janeiro.

The people of Alabama acting through their elected representatives — not UN bureaucrats — have the authority to develop the state’s environmental and development policies, the official synopsis of the law explains. Therefore, infringements on the property rights of citizens linked to “any other international law or ancillary plan of action that contravenes the Constitution of the United States or the Constitution of the State of Alabama” are also prohibited under the new measure.   

Of course, as the law points out, the UN has enlisted a broad array of non-governmental and inter-governmental organizations in its effort to foist Agenda 21 on the world — most notably a Germany-based group called ICLEI, formerly known as the International Council of Local Environmental Initiatives. But the new measure takes direct aim at that problem, too: “the State of Alabama and all political subdivisions may not enter into any agreement, expend any sum of money, or receive funds contracting services, or giving financial aid to or from” any such entities, as defined in Agenda 21 documents.

“This bill, that would bar the state from taking over private property without due process, is intended to shelter Alabamians from the United Nations Agenda 21, a sustainable development initiative that some conservatives see as a precursor for the creation of a world government,” explained Alabama GOP Executive Director T.J. Maloney when announcing that it had been signed into law. The Republican National Committee (RNC) adopted a resolution earlier this year blasting the global scheme and urging policy makers to oppose it, and state parties have followed suit.

Public support for the Alabama law was overwhelming and bipartisan as citizens who had been terrorized by Agenda 21-linked schemes targeting their private property spoke out. But according to analysts and state Republican Party officials cited in press reports, Gov. Bentley was originally hesitant to sign the bill — almost certainly due to concerns over the potential loss of some federal funding.

The U.S. Senate, of course, has never formally ratified Agenda 21. But the executive branch — in conjunction with accomplices at the international, state, and local levels — has for two decades been quietly attempting to impose the plan on Americans by stealth, mostly using deceptive terms like “Smart Growth” and “Green.” And proponents of the global scheme consistently threaten that states seeking to protect citizens from the UN plot could end up losing some federal funds.  

“Every time you take a dollar of federal money, there’s strings attached,” explained Ken Freeman, chairman of the Alabama-based group Alliance for Citizens Rights (ACR), an organization that fought hard to ensure that the Governor signed the bill into law. “We were originally walking soft on this issue, to tell you the truth, because when things were going our way, why change anything?”

But when Gov. Bentley did not immediately approve the bill, Freeman told a reporter, ACR turned the activism up a notch, urging citizens to contact the Governor’s office and express their support for the measure. The grassroots pressure paid off: Alabama became the first state to be officially shielded by law from UN-linked anti-property rights scheming. 

“It seems that Agenda 21 does actually bring people together in communities — just not in the way the U.N. had hoped for,” remarked Justice Gilpin-Green in a column for the conservative site Townhall, citing Freeman and other instrumental supporters of the effort. “Hopefully other states can mirror Alabama’s determined nature in passing their anti-Agenda 21 legislation. It was citizen awareness and direct action that finally brought about the needed changes last week and that same awareness and action will be needed for the future of every other state.”

Legislative analysts said the bill, sponsored by GOP state Sen. Gerald Dial, was extremely well crafted: protecting citizens and individual rights from UN decrees in a simple, straightforward manner that Agenda 21 advocates would have a hard time criticizing. Liberty-minded organizations and lawmakers are already examining the measure for potential use as a model in other states currently struggling to expel the global scheme and its myriad tentacles.

“Alabama House Bill 618 [SB 477] is a large step towards protecting Alabamians against UN meddling. It protects the due process rights of Alabamians. It keeps Constitutional Law above International Law,” noted Jason Baker, a Montgomery-based conservative pundit with the Examiner. “Now state after state awakens to the threat it poses to freedom and sovereignty.”

Across America, Tea Party groups, liberty-minded Democrats, libertarians, and a broad coalition of activists have been turning up the heat on Agenda 21. Tennessee, for example, adopted a bipartisan state resolution slamming the UN scheme as an “insidious” and “socialist” plot that is completely at odds with American traditions of limited government, individual freedom, private property, and self-governance under the Constitution. Numerous other states are pursuing similar measures.  

A bill similar to Alabama’s seeking a complete ban on Agenda 21 and unconstitutional UN “sustainability” efforts in Arizona was approved overwhelmingly in the state Senate. The legislation died in the state House even after clearing several hurdles, however, when the legislative session ended before a final vote could be taken. New Hampshire is reportedly working on a bill to ban Agenda 21 that sailed through the state House last month.

Meanwhile, local governments across America — under intense pressure from citizens and activist groups — are slowly awakening to what critics call the “dangers” of the UN scheme. Dozens of cities and counties have withdrawn from ICLEI in recent years, and as awareness continues to grow, that trend is expected to accelerate.

The UN, however, is doubling down on its controversial plan. In June, governments from all over the world will be meeting in Rio de Janeiro for the so-called “Conference on Sustainable Development” — known as Rio+20 for short. According to official documents released by the global body, the summit, headed by Chinese Communist Sha Zukang, will be seeking to dramatically transform human civilization under the guise of environmentalism.

Production, education, consumption, individual rights, and even people’s thoughts will all be targeted under the global plan to create a so-called “green economy,” the UN admitted. But with the tidal wave of opposition in America growing stronger every single day, analysts expect fierce U.S. opposition — if not from the Obama administration, at least from the increasingly outraged citizenry. 

Related articles:

Arizona Bill Would Ban UN Agenda 21 Within State

Tennessee Passes Resolution Slamming “Socialist” UN Agenda 21

Kansas Lawmakers Seek Resolution Against “Insidious” UN Agenda 21

EPA's Plans for Implementing UN's Agenda 21

What are the UN's Agenda 21 and ICLEI? 

Texas City Withdraws From ICLEI, UN “Agenda 21” 

UN Report for Rio+20 Outlines Top-down “Green” World Order

Photo: Alabama Gov. Robert Bentley speaks in Montgomery, Ala.: AP Images


  • Comment Link Follows TheWay Saturday, 13 July 2013 21:51 posted by Follows TheWay

    Dear Melanie Evans,

    If you check out the bible you will see that ALL of this is prophesied. The bible calls the perpetrators of the coming one-world-government the "rich men of the earth." And, yes, it IS a conspiracy.

  • Comment Link MemphisMickey Friday, 05 October 2012 10:15 posted by MemphisMickey

    And saving private business's property rights from the Guns in the Employee's parking log bill.
    TN Legislature or the United Nations, it doesn't matter, Protect Private Property Rights!

  • Comment Link Melanie Evans Sunday, 17 June 2012 10:59 posted by Melanie Evans

    Incredibly naive viewpoints... It began back when the US was founded. How can 2 parties from the same side sign the same agreement & expect it to be valid? It does not work... That was the Constitution, folks... The greatest hoax ever foisted on the American people...

    Trying to enforce anything under the Constitution will cease once the powers that be come out & publicly admit that this document has been set aside. In fact, it already HAS been set aside - when the Supreme Court ruled you have no right to put into your body what you feel is good food, because you, in fact, are chattel of the State... (That's what it means when your name appears in all caps on birth certificates or driver licenses, folks... YOU are a corporation. Your person is chattel of the State. YOU are being farmed. Wake up.)

    Of course, having all States get together & sign into law similar legislation would force them to reveal their hand... altho that may not be of benefit to all... Interesting that this should start again with the South...

    Prepare to see things some historical figures have only dreamed about... I have found a safe place and shall watch from afar, as I am too old to do any good and would only slow my loved ones down. Rather, my job is to prepare a last-ditch bolt-hole for those who can escape if there is a need to. Granny stocking the root cellar or some such...

    20 years ago none would listen... 10 years ago, they did not want to listen. 5 years ago Dancing with the Stars & the Kardashians was more important... I'm done trying to wake up the American public... Just taking care of me & my own from now on.

    Luck to all of the resistance. You are going to need it.

  • Comment Link Robert M Stahl Friday, 15 June 2012 19:11 posted by Robert M Stahl

    There is a sense, and sensibility to the word ECOLOGY. Gregory Bateson's Steps to an Ecology of Mind comes into the limelight for me. The power to say the same thing about the most the human race has to offer with two forms of the same message, that to MDs in training as well as artists in graduate programs is indicative of something great to science, and epistemology where something emerges out of the landscape. But, I do agree these people in government need to be watched. If only the cells SWAT was supposed to take out were not in control of SWAT to begin with., google Indira Singh Guns and Butter from back in 2005, and William Binney or James Bamford's The Shadow Factory. Bluffdale, Utah comes on line in September and is equivalent to an atomic bomb, but in the covert detail of an explosion. Know foam from fomenting, please.

  • Comment Link Madeleine Thursday, 07 June 2012 19:59 posted by Madeleine

    I think its time ot withdraw from Globlaization and certainly the UN. Globalization has not done a thing for us, It is being used ot promote communism and put a communist regime in place. Now the UN says they want to redefine human civilization. me too , we can start with them, get out of our country and take care of your own people, we arre not living in a communist regime yet, China still has a way ot go before they actually own this country, they wouldn't know what to do with it if they did, They are getting a little too pushy for me, who died and left them boss? What nerve., Cina wants to disarm us and they are not happey with the way we run this country, that alone shoul make you want to kick their hind quarters back to China where they belong. They ar enot the boss o fme, neither is The UN, they are going ot fall and go boom, the sooner the better. wake up, these people are crazy.We should not even be dealiong with them. Obama had the nerve ot call us arrogant? I think they have all been hit with the looney stick. .

Please Log In To Comment
Log in