Alex Newman

Tuesday, 09 August 2011 12:52

GOP Presidential Candidate Herman Cain

Until recently, Herman Cain was a largely unknown businessman whose major claims to fame included a high-level appointment in the Federal Reserve System and some degree of success in the private sector. But after an early GOP primary debate hosted by Fox News, his name exploded into the headlines as that of a serious contender for the 2012 Republican nomination.

The eyes of the nation are on Wisconsin again as voters head to the polls to decide the fate of eight state Senators — six Republicans and two Democrats — in a series of historic recall elections. And the stakes are enormous.

The federal war on drugs is coming under attack from multiple angles, most recently with the introduction of a bill in Congress by conservative Rep. Ron Paul and liberal Rep. Barney Frank that would end the national prohibition on marijuana and allow states to set their own policies.

Activists slammed a series of media pieces that blatantly misrepresented the facts about Republican presidential contenders Rep. Ron Paul and former Utah Governor and Obama appointee Jon Huntsman (left) regarding the war in Afghanistan.

Among the culprits were the Wall Street Journal, Politico.com, The Atlantic, and Esquire magazine. The inaccuracies ranged from obvious factual errors to subtle distortions. But they didn’t go unnoticed.

Former Utah Gov. Jon Huntsman Jr. (pictured), who served under the Obama administration as U.S. Ambassador to communist China, officially announced that he would be seeking the 2012 Republican nomination for President.  

While Huntsman is not very well known outside of political circles, his GOP bid received a big boost over the weekend when he placed second in the Republican Leadership Conference straw poll. Though Texas Rep. Ron Paul won in a landslide, establishment-media talking heads attempted to frame the news as a big victory for Huntsman’s campaign.

High-ranking Texas officials groped by agents with the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) are sounding off about the scandal in the press, adding more pressure on state lawmakers and Gov. Rick Perry to resurrect a bill criminalizing the invasive measures without probable cause.  

In May, it appeared likely that the Texas anti-groping legislation would succeed. After unanimously sailing through the state House of Representatives, the bill was on its way to passage in the Texas Senate. Originally it had more than enough support to pass.

Then the feds intervened. U.S. Attorney John E. Murphy sent a thinly veiled warning to lawmakers and senior officials: if the TSA was no longer permitted to violate the Fourth Amendment rights of passengers and the courts refused to block the legislation, the federal government would basically create a “no-fly zone” in Texas.

The State Senate backed down. But the battle is still not over. In fact, it may be just getting started. After two Texas officials described their recent experiences with the TSA on local television, calls for state action are growing even louder.

The first victim was Chairman Barry Smitherman of the Texas Public Utility Commission. At the airport in New Orleans, Smitherman was ordered to go through the so-called “naked body scanner” by a TSA worker. He declined, asking to go through the metal detector instead.

The TSA representative promptly and loudly began trumpeting the fact that a passenger had opted-out of the invasive machine, which produces naked images of passengers‘ bodies. Agents spent around 40 minutes tearing through his hand luggage. And he got the notorious TSA “pat down,” a procedure that countless critics refer to as sexual assault.

"Let me put this delicately," Smitherman told a local Fox affiliate in an interview. "I was still feeling the effects of the pat down as I sat in my seat from New Orleans to Houston and then Houston to Austin."

Smitherman told the TSA agent that he felt like he was being “punished” for “opting out.” And incredibly, the agent admitted that to be the case, Smitherman said.

State Rep. Barbara Nash, also interviewed for the segment, was horrified by her recent treatment at the hands of the TSA, too. “[The agent] made me move my legs apart, and she felt down my legs, and up - all the way up,” Rep. Nash explained after the incident. “And then she made me stand a different way where she could go all the way up the front and then all the way up the back of my dress.”

The Republican lawmaker told Fox7 that she wouldn’t want children or her constituents to be subjected to similar abuse. Watch the video below:

Insert video here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AKE98sJpGig

Incidents like those described by the state officials were exactly the sort of  problem that the wildly popular anti-TSA bill was supposed to remedy. In the absence of probable cause, such behavior could have landed TSA workers in jail. The bill would have criminalized “intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly touching the anus, sexual organ, buttocks, or breast of the other person, including touching through clothing, or touching the other person in a manner that would be offensive to a reasonable person” by federal agents.

The author and original sponsor of the legislation, state Rep. David Simpson, explained why such a measure was necessary: “The federal government is attempting to deprive the citizens of Texas of their constitutional rights under the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution and Article 1, Section 9, of the Texas Constitution,” he noted. “If we do not stand up for our citizens in the face of this deprivation of their personal rights and dignity, who will?”

But after at least a dozen state senators cowered before the federal intimidation campaign, some activists thought it was over. Since the legislative session was just about finished, it appeared that the anti-TSA legislation would have to wait. But now, there is renewed hope: Gov. Perry has called a special session, providing another opportunity for Texas to adopt the bill this year.

Since being re-introduced, it has already passed unanimously out of the House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence. And more than 75 percent of state representatives so far have co-sponsored the bill again.

The Lt. Governor is onboard this time, too. State Sen. Dan Patrick also re-introduced the bill into the Senate. And this time, he says there are enough votes to pass it.

Now the fate of the bill rests with Gov. Perry. In Texas, only legislation that is called up by the governor can be voted on during the special legislative session. So, a broad coalition of liberty-minded organizations is mobilizing to make sure that happens.

On June 4, a rally organized by Texans for Accountable Government (TAG) was held at the Texas Capitol to pressure Perry. “Texans have drawn the line against TSA's egregious abuse of power and the US Department of ‘Justice’ threatening a 'no-fly zone'!” the group said on its website, urging supporters to get involved. “Governor Perry has said, on the record, that he will add this legislation to the special session if there is enough support from members of the House and Senate. Now it's time for more grassroots action!”

More than a few other groups are also working on the massive campaign, urging Texans to flood Gov. Perry’s office with phone calls expressing support for the bill. The John Birch Society, Campaign for Liberty, the Libertarian Party of Texas and other organizations are all getting involved.

“First, the TSA threatened to shut down Texas airports. Now they are molesting state officials,” said Ken Hoover, a field coordinator for The John Birch Society in South and Central Texas and the borderlands. “How much more do they have to do before Texans say enough is enough?” In correspondence with Texas members and supporters of the JBS, Hoover urged them to call Gov. Perry’s office at (512) 463-2000.

The special legislative session will come to an end by July 1 at the latest. So, as activists noted, time is of the essence if Texans hope to stop TSA abuses this year.

Other states are also considering similar measures right now. And according to analysts, that’s another reason why the battle in Texas is so crucial: the outcome in the Lone Star State could have an important impact on state-based efforts to restrain the TSA and restore the God-given rights of Americans nationwide. 

A county judge whose son has worked for the SEIU and the AFL-CIO struck down a Wisconsin law that would have limited some of the collective-bargaining privileges of government-employee unions, sparking outrage from lawmakers who are determined to salvage the legislation in an effort to tackle the state‘s multi-billion dollar budget crisis. But despite the ruling, the battle over reform is still far from over.

A Texas bill that would have made Transportation Security Administration (TSA) agents liable for sexual assault when groping passengers without probable cause was pulled from the Senate floor after the Department of Justice sent a letter threatening to create what critics called a “no-fly zone” over the state by preventing flights to or from Texas airports. However, as will be demonstrated in a follow-up report by a colleague, there may well be "life after death" for this bill.

Herman Cain

Former Federal Reserve insider Herman Cain, being touted by various media outlets as a “Tea Party favorite,” officially announced on May 21 that he would be seeking the 2012 Republican nomination for President.

Diana DiazU.S. Border Patrol agents' union-dues money is being used to fund a variety of pro-amnesty and anti-border enforcement politicians while agents are being denied the full benefits they were expecting in case of trouble, revealed Liberty News Network national correspondent Andy Ramirez in a new video report.

Log in