Friday, 21 February 2014 12:55

Climate Scientist: “Global Warming Nazis” Threaten Humanity

Written by 

As global-warming alarmists become increasingly deranged in their attacks on experts and critics who reject their controversial and increasingly discredited theory, at least one of the world’s leading climate scientists has finally had enough. Dr. Roy Spencer (shown), who served as senior scientist for climate studies at NASA, published a scathing rebuke of the alarmists and their “extremist” rhetoric.

Referring to the alarmists as “global warming Nazis,” Dr. Spencer warned that their “pseudo-scientific ramblings” and support for fascist-style “radical policies” literally threaten the lives of millions of people — especially the poor.

What appears to have set off Spencer — a Ph.D. in meteorology and principal research scientist at the University of Alabama in Huntsville — are the ever-more vicious and absurd tactics of extreme global-warming theorists.

In a February 20 piece on his website headlined “Time to push back against the global warming Nazis,” the climate expert notes that “somebody” pushed his button. “When politicians and scientists started calling people like me ‘deniers,’ they crossed the line,” he wrote.

As countless other experts, scientists, and analysts have also noted, Spencer said that the warmists were trying to equate skeptics of global warming theories — those who do not see climate change as man-made or a serious problem — with those who deny that Hitler’s National Socialist (Nazi) regime exterminated millions of Jews.

“Too many of us for too long have ignored the repulsive, extremist nature of the comparison,” Spencer wrote. “It’s time to push back.”

In response, Spencer said, he is going to start calling them “global warming Nazis.” There are very good reasons for the comparison, too, he added.

“The pseudo-scientific ramblings by their leaders have falsely warned of mass starvation, ecological collapse, agricultural collapse, overpopulation ... all so that the masses would support their radical policies,” he said. “Policies that would not voluntarily be supported by a majority of freedom-loving people.”

According to Dr. Spencer, whose latest post has already attracted the fury of “global warming Nazis,” the alarmists are just as guilty as a person who yells “fire!” in a crowded theater when there is actually no fire. “Except they threaten the lives of millions of people in the process,” he explained.

“Like the Nazis, they advocate the supreme authority of the state (fascism), which in turn supports their scientific research to support their cause (in the 1930s, it was superiority of the white race),” Spencer added.

The attack on science in the name of dubious global-warming theories, which The New American has described in great detail, also ruffled Dr. Spencer’s feathers. “Dissenting scientific views are now jack-booted through tactics like pressuring scientific journals to not publish papers with which they disagree ... even getting journal editors to resign,” he wrote.

Indeed, as the world learned during ClimateGate and ClimateGate II, leading so-called “climate scientists” were exposed in leaked e-mails doing precisely what Spencer describes — and more. In addition to being caught trying to silence scientific viewpoints, the warmists, many of whom contributed to the United Nations’ alarmist and discredited reports, were exposed fudging data to “hide the decline” in global temperatures and even conspiring to break the law

There are many more reasons why the vicious warming-theorists resemble the National Socialists, too. “Like the Nazis, they are anti-capitalist,” Spencer said. “They are willing to sacrifice millions of lives of poor people at the altar of radical environmentalism, advocating expensive energy policies that increase poverty. And if there is a historically demonstrable threat to humanity, it is poverty.”

As many publications and analysts have documented, the warmists’ hatred of energy and prosperity is deeply ingrained.

Spencer made clear that those who believe in finding new forms of energy are not the problem. “I’m instead talking about the extremists. They are the ones who are sure they are right, and who are bent on forcing their views upon everyone else,” he said. “Unfortunately, the extremists are usually the only ones you hear from in the media, because they scream the loudest and make the most outrageous claims.”

As countless real scientists and experts have also done, Spencer blasted the bogus invocation of “consensus” in the debate. “This authoritarianism tends to happen with an over-educated elite class,” he added. “I have read that Nazi Germany had more PhDs per capita than any other country. I’m not against education, but it seems like some of the stupidest people are also the most educated.”

Spencer, who pointed out that he did not start the fight, concluded by saying that as long as the warming-theorist extremists continue to call those who disagree with their theory “deniers,” he will keep calling them “global warming Nazis.”

In the comments of his blog, several people wondered whether the term Nazi might be over the top. In a follow-up note, he disagreed. “Considering the fact that these people are supporting policies that will kill far more people than the Nazis ever did — all in the name of what they consider to be a righteous cause — I think it is very appropriate,” Spencer said. “Again, I didn’t start the name-calling.”

As The New American reported just this week, the climate alarmists are now, in fact, openly advocating murderous totalitarianism as a way to fight “global warming” (which, of course, has been on “pause” for 17 years and counting).

Even as many experts are forecasting global cooling, real scientists and people everywhere must continue to reject tyranny and pseudo-science. Spencer deserves credit for fighting back.

Photo of Dr. Roy Spencer

Alex Newman is a correspondent for The New American, covering economics, science, politics, and more. He can be reached at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. .

Related articles:

Climate Alarmists Push Chinese Communism, Population Control

U.S. Agencies Accused of Fudging Data to Show Global Warming

Top Scientists Slam and Ridicule UN IPCC Climate Report

UN Carbon Regime Would Devastate Humanity

“Climate Science” in Shambles: Real Scientists Battle UN Agenda

Global-warming Alarmism Dying a Slow Death

The Real Agenda Behind UN “Sustainability” Unmasked

NASA Data: Global Warming Still on “Pause,” Sea Ice Hit Record       

Global Warming Alarmists, Looking Ridiculous, Double Down

Global Warming Alarmists Stuck in Antarctic Sea Ice

Climate Theories Crumble as Data and Experts Suggest Global Cooling


  • Comment Link Heidi Preston Saturday, 22 February 2014 20:44 posted by Heidi Preston

    "Those who do not see climate change as man-made or a serious problem — with those who deny that Hitler’s National Socialist (Nazi) regime exterminated millions of Jews."

    I would equate it more with those who deny that "Wall Street helped the uprisings of both the Bolshevik Revolution and the Rise of Hitler" (Anthony c. Sutton) and had/have more to do with the climate change phenomenon then random human intervention and carbon (tax initiatives).

    1.In 2000 and 2001, Chicago Climate Exchange received start-up grants from the Joyce Foundation. [BLOOMBERG REPORTER: So how big do you think this market could be?
    RICHARD SANDOR, CHICAGO CLIMATE EXCHANGE: I think it’s a $10 trillion a year market.]
    2.A $10 trillion a year market? That’s a lot to go around. In comparison, the value of U.S. company shares on major U.S. and foreign stock exchanges equities market was $15 trillion in 2009. There’s a lot of money riding on this climate legislation. But remember: It’s all about saving the Earth.
    London-based Generation Investment Management sees the earning potential as well. That’s why they purchased a stake in Chicago Climate Exchange and are the fifth largest shareholder. The cofounder of the London-based firm? Former Vice President Al Gore. I say cofounder because some of the other founders include David Blood (former Goldman executive), Mark Ferguson (Goldman) and Peter Harris (Goldman).
    In 2006, the Chicago Climate Exchange got a nice boost of confidence when an investor stepped to the plate and ponied up to purchase 10 percent of the combined company. Cofounder of the Chicago Exchange said the investment was big and welcome news. The investor? Goldman Sachs.
    Oh and I almost forgot: The person at the beginning of it all? The one on the board of the Joyce Foundation that secured the initial funding for this project? Barack Obama.-Apr 27, 2010 Glenn Beck (now we know why he got fired..the truth shall set you free...permanently.LOL

    3.1991 Club of Rome, Aurello Paccei "Searching for a new energy to UNITE us, we came up with...All these DANGERS are caused by human intervention." (who's the Nazi Gestapo now...deniers of the truth)

    4. the two major companies are draining our Great Lakes, they are Suez environment (note how they make it sound like they are protecting our water) also known as United Water in the United States and Veolia Water (which also has titles such as Veolia environment, Veolia waste treatment, Veolia transportation). These are the companies that are draining the Great Lakes that supply the waters from Nevada, AZ,California, and even parts of Northern Mexico.

    All these HUMAN INTERVENTIONS are causing droughts and lack of water supply in addition to normal weather cycles. To use the holocaust (which comes from the Greek word holokauston, itself a translation of the Hebrew olah, meaning "completely burnt offering to God," implying that Jews and other "undesirables" murdered during World War II were a sacrifice to God). Interestedly enough this is a Babylonian Talmud idea of abuse of children (Babylonian Talmud, Tractate kethuboth 11a Soncino 1961 Edition, page 57) and child sacrifices which was rejected by the written law of Moses (Mosaic law) and which Jesus endorsed "Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfill."

    So no need for human sacrifices either in the Hebrew world or Christian World (Hitler (aka Schicklgruber was by Jewish law a Jew and tried to hide it, but not a Christian). It's been shown that through the binding of Isaac that human /child sacrifice was not what god wanted..."took his first born, who was to succeed him as a king and offered him a burnt offering (11Kings 3:27) (Akedah)....the angel of god "now I know you fear God." At this point Abraham sees a ram caught in some nearby bushes and sacrifices the ram instead of Isaac.

    So human sacrifice is an archaic godless act which could be applied to the destruction of all "undesirables" according to Hilters regime, but it was never, ever to the God of Abraham or Christians, but probably to the fallen angel instead. To use such terms is to get an emotional appeal which has no place either in the climate change arena unless one sees it as the sacrifice (lack of water, starvation ect.) of the people by another elite section of society to deliberately sacrifice all people to their fallen angel god Lucifer.

    I realize we took some strange turns in this discussion but that's what happens when you try to use emotionalism, religion and politics into the mix of power and control.

  • Comment Link Tionico Saturday, 22 February 2014 20:10 posted by Tionico

    His bit about the high lenel of "education" some of the worst exhibit was particularly incisive. A recent stint in a major supported institution of "higher learning" bbrought me into too-close contact with one of these climate nazis, and I referred to her in precisely that term. NO ONE could tell her anything, and she "went off" on anyone hinting that the world is not in grave and immediate danger from this fantasy. Every class project fairly dripped with either a psychotic concern with things like "carbon footprint" and "energy responsibility", or her other fetish, that of furthering the homosexual agenda. I was SO GLAD to find suitable programmes the nexty term that did NOT include her on the list of "dangerous ingredients". How many billions of pubilc money go to feed the likes of this one? And since younger college students have not learned yet how to THINK and REASON, they are overly susceptible to the rantings of such as this. No wonder they are gaining ground.

  • Comment Link Nora Saturday, 22 February 2014 13:45 posted by Nora

    You GO, Dr. Roy Spencer! We need this straight up kind of slap back and well chosen words. He is a blessing!

  • Comment Link Al Saturday, 22 February 2014 10:40 posted by Al

    It has become an unfortunate fact of life that realists (Conservatives) no longer have the luxury of pulling punches. Dealing with climate corruptocrats requires hunkering down to their level and speaking their low-brow language.

    God Bless, Dr. Spencer. Hope you know just how many Americans are applauding you.

Please Log In To Comment
Log in