Thursday, 17 January 2013 18:30

Rand Paul's Bill to Nullify “King” Obama's Gun Control Executive Orders

Written by 

Senator Rand Paul (R-Kentucky) announced on Wednesday that he will introduce legislation next week to “nullify” unconstitutional executive orders that President Obama has said he will issue to implement new national gun controls.

Appearing on the Fox network with Sean Hannity, Paul pointed out that several of the president’s executive orders “appear as if he’s writing new law,” which would be an executive trespass on the legislative powers of Congress and a violation of the Constitution’s separation of powers. “I’m afraid that President Obama may have this ‘king complex’ sort of developing, and we’re going to make sure it doesn’t happen,” he told Hannity.

Supporters of Obama’s push to restrict private ownership of firearms are hoping to exploit the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting tragedy to eviscerate the Second Amendment. 

The New American contacted Sen. Paul’s office today to obtain details of his legislative proposal, which was not yet available on his website. Both Sen. Paul and his media spokesman were out of the office, so the only particulars of his "Separation of Powers Restoration and Second Amendment Protection of 2013" to be found at this time is a one-page summary draft plan that has appeared on the website Talking Points Memo.

“We only have descriptions of the executive actions, yet many could be construed to describe an attempt by the executive to make laws in violation of the Article 1, Sec. 8 of the Constitution and the 2nd Amendment,” reads the one-page summary.

“Congress has enumerated powers in the Constitution," it continues, "and any executive order by President Obama infringing on the Second Amendment rights of all Americans would be declared ‘null and void.’”

Paul's plan also contemplates using Congress' power of the purse strings to withhold funding from any attempt to implement unconstitutional executive order attacks on the 2nd Amendment. 

Sen. Kaine: "Nullification is a code word"

The Left began responding immediately to Paul’s proposal with the usual scorn for any efforts aimed at reining in an out-of-control federal government. Joan Walsh at Salon.com reflexively offered the “Progressive” view that Sen. Paul’s effort is really nothing except thinly disguised “racist” state’s rights rhetoric.

Sen. Tim Kaine implied the same in an exchange with Soledad O’Brien on CNN

Senator Tim Kaine (D-VA) adds his voice to the gun control debate, lends support for President Obama’s executive actions and comments on Senator Rand Paul’s desire to nullify the President’s orders.

Sen. Kaine says, “Nullification is a code word.”

CNN’s Soledad O’Brien asks, “For what?”

Sen. Kaine responds, “It’s a states right argument that gets used in times of great controversy. The President is acting by executive power that is legally conferred on him. And as you pointed out, you went over these executive orders. They’re basic, common sense things.”

When O’Brien asks him to clarify his ‘code word’ statement, Sen. Kaine answers, “We’ll see what it is. But the notion that we’re going to nullify a presidential action when the President is acting pursuant to law, you know, that’s just kind of this anti-government rhetoric that I’m surprised to hear somebody in government using." 

Paul believes that there will be a severe political backlash for many members of Congress if they fail to oppose President Obama on this fundamental issue. “I think there are a few Democrats that will worry about going home to West Virginia or other states like that and voting for a ban on guns,” Paul said. “So, I think there is a good chance we can stop his legislative action. I’m concerned he will try to do the regulatory fiat, what he can’t pass through legislation.”

Photo of Sen. Rand Paul: AP Images

Related articles:

12 States Have Bills to Nullify ObamaCare

Police Chief Seeks Nullification of Unconstitutional Gun Control

A Brilliant Exposition on the Effectiveness of Nullification

State vs. Federal: The Nullification Movement

Nullification in a Nutshell

Thomas Woods: On the Fed, Nullification, and Rollback

Interview with Tom Woods at CPAC 2011

The Case for Nullification

2 comments

  • Comment Link Todd Friday, 18 January 2013 18:11 posted by Todd

    When are they ever going to stop mistaking freedom for racism. It would take an oxymoron to make that oxymoron. And its just gettin OLD !

    (this is off subject, for sure, but seeing that nobody says much around here);
    To sirburban; I’m not trying to be insulting, so don’t take this the wrong way. I’m not exactly familiar as to how the left uses sanctuary cities for any particular agenda. I guess it could be used for illegal immigrants, but it could also be used to help people who are being persecuted in various countries. So, I personally am not opposed to such a thing, as long as it were not used to undermine sovereignty, nor as a harbor for illegals. If you ever visited such websites as Voice of the Martyrs, http://www.persecution.com you would understand why I am not against offering sanctuary for people who are being brutalized by tyrants, and extremists. But, as you pointed out, it would not be good for the UN to control such a place; perhaps merely congressional approval to allow US based charities to establish such things on vacant BLM land.
    The problem is that, this country spends billions fighting one tyrant in order to put another tyrant in his place, and throughout, and afterwards, the villagers who were victimized, get victimized all the more, and nobody ever hears a word of it. I am not a liberal, but very much a conservative minded person, but those people at VOM - those are my people getting wacked. I met one guy who was, at first, denied asylum after being sentenced to death in his own Islamist country. His name was Getanah. He showed us pictures of the severed hands and feet of some of his people who dared convert away from Islam. They hang them on flag poles as a public display. And those are the mild stories. Do you have any thoughts on what else could be done, if not sanctuaries ?

  • Comment Link sirburban Friday, 18 January 2013 13:57 posted by sirburban

    "Code words" do exist and the left wing uses them all the time. "Sanctuary Cities" is a form of secession; noncooperation with FEDERAL immigration laws. But since the goal of sanctuary cities is to move in the direction of secession away from the republic and into the arms of the UN, why the left gives it a positive spin leaving out the particulars of what sanctuary cities is really all about.

    Sanctuary Cities is flaunting of federal law by providing a safe hideout for those illegally entering the country.


    More Leftist code words are womens' rights, civil rights, UN peace force, designed to for

Please Log In To Comment
Log in