Friday, 01 August 2014 17:03

House Votes to Proceed with Lawsuit Against Obama

Written by 

Earlier this week, the House of Representatives paved the way for a lawsuit against President Obama for his abuse of power. In June, House Speaker John Boehner (shown, R-Ohio) accused the president of not faithfully executing the laws of the United States and announced plans to file suit. On July 30, House Republicans voted to proceed with that lawsuit.

The Washington Post reports, "The nearly party-line vote — all Democrats voted against it, and all but five Republicans voted for it — further agitated an already polarized climate on Capitol Hill as both parties used the pending suit to try to rally support ahead of the November elections."

Despite accusations by Democrats that the move is merely a political stunt, Boehner asserts that the purpose of the suit is to restore the authority of the Constitution. "The Constitution makes it clear that a president’s job is to faithfully execute the laws. In my view, the president has not faithfully executed the laws," the Ohio Republican said.

In his June memo to House Republicans, Boehner outlined the foundation for his decision to pursue the lawsuit:

On one matter after another during his presidency, President Obama has circumvented the Congress through executive action, creating his own laws and excusing himself from executing statutes he is sworn to enforce — at times even boasting about his willingness to do it, as if daring the American people to stop him. On matters ranging from health care and energy to foreign policy and education, President Obama has repeatedly run an end-around on the American people and their elected legislators, straining the boundaries of the solemn oath he took on Inauguration Day.

In public, President Obama has appeared unconcerned about the impending lawsuit. "They’re going to sue me for taking executive actions to help people. So they’re mad I’m doing my job," Obama said in an economics speech in Kansas City, Missouri. "And by the way, I’ve told them I’d be happy to do it with you. The only reason I’m doing it on my own is because you’re not doing anything," he said of Congress. "Stop being mad all the time. Stop just hatin' all the time," Obama added. "Everyone sees this as a political stunt."

Democrats continue to link the lawsuit to calls for impeachment. As Rep. Louise M. Slaughter (D-N.Y.) remarked, "This lawsuit is the drumbeat pushing members of the Republican Party to impeachment."

But Boehner and House Republicans say it's not so. "This is not about impeachment — it's about him faithfully executing the laws of this county," Boehner said. "My view is the president has not faithfully executed the laws. What we have seen clearly over the last five years is an effort to erode the power of the Legislative Branch."

While this is not the first time that members of Congress have filed lawsuits or briefs in support of suits against presidents, this particular case is different because of the recent vote. The Washington Post writes, "The novel idea for Thursday's vote was driven by a clutch of conservative legal scholars who contend that the best way for Republicans to have legal standing in federal court is if the entire body passes legislation authorizing it."

If the courts in fact do decide to take up the suit, it is not likely that a conclusion would be reached during Obama's presidency. Still, a decision in the case could help to restore the balance between the executive and legislative branches.

Photo of House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio): AP Images


  • Comment Link joe Sunday, 03 August 2014 15:20 posted by joe

    This all a part of their plan to dilute your vote. I am dependent of the FEDS to feed me, pay my housing, medical care, and collect the benefits without working, or paying taxes,

    This my friends is called socialism.

  • Comment Link joe Sunday, 03 August 2014 15:10 posted by joe

    My sister sent me an interesting how do the appear at the border article he other day.

    Imagine you are a 3 year old to 8 year old child. You are on your own without adults.

    You are asked to walk from Houston, Texas to Minneapolis, Minnesota on your own with no food or belongs to sustain you.

    Then you are asked to walk an addition 100 miles past Minnesota. Could you do it?

    How long would it take you as a 6 year old? That is the minimum distance these poor, helpless little ones have supposedly walked from Central America to the border of Texas, again, on their own. They didn't get lost.

    And they survived the journey without help (unless you buy in to the notion that a destitute out-of-work family run out of their homes by gangs and living in squalor somehow came up with $8,000 to $10,000 for EACH child to pay a coyote to take them to the border).

    Think about it.

  • Comment Link Heidi Preston Friday, 01 August 2014 19:34 posted by Heidi Preston

    At this time in American history it does not have the resources to "help" these new illegal immigrants to be absorbed into the financial system. The solution will be for a North American Union. The highway is already being built quietly. The resources will be pooled together just like the EU, the NU will be a sub- corporation just like the EU answering to the big UNITED Nations with the main banking function in Switzerland under the BIS. The union of Europe was in the making long before even HItler gained power it's been a dream in the making for a long time and at each STEP they had helpers within the system to promote it...the United States has it's henchmen too (both parties...BUSH, CLINTONS,ROCKERFELLERS, OBAMA ect.). It's communism/socialism.
    Moses Hess (the real father of Communism) "originally advocated Jewish integration into the UNIVERSALIST socialist movement, and was a friend and collaborator of Karl Marx and "converted" Friederich Englels to communism. He [Moses Hess] played an important role in transforming Hegelism dialectial idealism theory of history to the dialectical Materialism of Marxism, by conceiving of MAN (Moses Hess was originally responsible for the phrase...religion the "opiate of the people") as the INITIATOR of HISTORY through his ACTIVE CONSCIOUSNESS.....Hess worked for Rheinishche (meaning Rheinland in Germany) Zeitung (newspaper) founded by LIIBERAL Rheinish BUSINESSMEN.

    So no Religion so that the Businessmen can advocate the distribution of wealth among the masses around the world while the Elites reap and rule the new kingdom of it. How do you do that...get lots of slave labor happy to embrace the welfare state of America.

Please Log In To Comment
Log in