Wednesday, 25 September 2013 17:00

Kerry Signs UN Arms Trade Treaty — Civilian Disarmament Advancing

Written by 

Secretary of State John Kerry signed the United Nations Arms Trade Treaty Wednesday. Upon adding his signature, Kerry addressed the world body:

On behalf of President Obama and the United States of America, I am very pleased to have signed this treaty here today. I signed it because President Obama knows that from decades of efforts that at any time that we work with — cooperatively to address the illicit trade in conventional weapons, we make the world a safer place. And this treaty is a significant step in that effort.

Promptly, Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon thanked Kerry and Obama for their complicity in consolidating UN control over weapons and ammunition:

Today, a number of countries signed the Arms Trade Treaty, pushing the total number of signatures to more than half of all Member States.

The Secretary-General, as the depository of the Treaty, welcomes every signature to this important treaty.  At the same time, it is of particular significance that the largest arms exporting country in the world, the United States, is now also among those countries who have committed themselves to a global regulation of the arms trade.  He believes this will contribute to efforts to reduce insecurity and suffering for people on all continents. He calls upon other countries to follow suit.

On Monday, a source inside the State Department alerted The New American that Secretary Kerry would commit this act of treason. What’s more, we were told that key members of the Senate were informed Tuesday that Kerry intended to sign the treaty and that the reaction from senators was one of disinterest.

In fairness, a few senators have spoken out today (Wednesday), warning President Obama not to try to bypass the Senate in his fervor to enforce the terms of this globalist gun grab. 

Senator Bob Corker (R-Tenn.), the ranking member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, sent the president a letter reminding him that:

As you know, Article II, Section 2 of the United States Constitution requires the United States Senate to provide its advice and consent before a treaty becomes binding under United States law.  The Senate has not yet provided its advice and consent, and may not provide such consent.  As a result, the Executive Branch is not authorized to take any steps to implement the treaty.

President Obama knows this and he also knows that in March, 53 senators voted “to uphold Second Amendment rights and prevent the United States from entering into the United Nations Arms Trade Treaty.”

Americans know something, too. They know that this administration has never failed to use every murderous act of armed violence as a pretext for tyranny. From Newtown to the Navy Yard, President Obama has issued scores of executive orders directly violating the Constitution’s explicit prohibition on the infringement of the right to keep and bear arms. 

John Kerry’s signing of the Arms Trade Treaty demonstrates that he and his boss will continue along this treasonous trajectory until control of all weapons and ammunition is consolidated into the UN and its client governments.

There is so much wrong and so much unconstitutional about the Arms Trade Treaty that it is difficult to describe it all. The following summary of the agreement should be sufficient, however, to call to action all constitutionalists, gun owners, and lovers of liberty. Senators, President Obama, and Secretary of State John Kerry must know that we will not sit idly by while they surrender our sovereignty and plot to confiscate our weapons.

First, the Arms Trade Treaty grants a monopoly over all weaponry in the hands of the very entity (approved regimes) responsible for over 300 million murders in the 20th century. 

Furthermore, the treaty leaves private citizens powerless to oppose future slaughters. 

An irrefutable fact of armed violence unaddressed by the UN in its gun grab is that all the murders committed by all the serial killers in history don't amount to a fraction of the brutal killings committed by "authorized state parties" using the very weapons over which they will exercise absolute control under the terms of the Arms Trade Treaty.

Article 2 of the treaty defines the scope of the treaty’s prohibitions. The right to own, buy, sell, trade, or transfer all means of armed resistance, including handguns, is denied to civilians by this section of the Arms Trade Treaty.

Article 3 places the “ammunition/munitions fired, launched or delivered by the conventional arms covered under Article 2” within the scope of the treaty’s prohibitions, as well.

Article 4 rounds out the regulations, also placing all “parts and components” of weapons within the scheme.

Perhaps the most immediate threat to the rights of gun owners in the Arms Trade Treaty is found in Article 5. Under the title of “General Implementation,” Article 5 mandates that all countries participating in the treaty “shall establish and maintain a national control system, including a national control list.”

This list should “apply the provisions of this Treaty to the broadest range of conventional arms.”

Mark it down: If the treaty is ratified by the United States or if its provisions are enforced by executive order, within months the federal government (likely under the management of the Department of Homeland Security) would begin compiling a list of who owns, buys, sells, trades, or transfers any firearm, as well as the ammunition, parts, and components of those weapons. 

After creating this database, the federal government would be required under the provisions of Article 5(4) of the Arms Trade Treaty to “provide its national control list to the Secretariat, which shall make it available to other States Parties.”

That’s right. The UN treaty demands that the list of gun and ammunition owners not only be in the hands of our own government, but be sent to foreign regimes, as well. This provision would guarantee that should an American owner of a legally purchased firearm decide to emigrate, he will be on the radar of the ruling regime in his new home.

Americans are right to recognize this registry as the first step toward confiscation. Without such a registry, it would be impossible to monitor weapons transfers effectively because governments can’t track weapons exchanges and transfers unless they know who has them to begin with.

Article 12 adds to the record-keeping requirement, mandating that the list include “the quantity, value, model/type, authorized international transfers of conventional arms,” as well as the identity of the “end users” of these items.

In very clear terms, ratification of the Arms Trade Treaty by the United States would require that the U.S. government force gun owners to add their names to the national registry. Citizens would be required to report the amount and type of all firearms and ammunition they possess.

Section 4 of Article 12 of the treaty requires that the list be kept for at least 10 years.

Finally, the agreement demands that national governments take “appropriate measures” to enforce the terms of the treaty, including civilian disarmament. If these countries can’t get this done on their own, however, Article 16 provides for UN assistance, specifically including help with the enforcement of “stockpile management, disarmament, demobilization and reintegration programmes.”

In fact, a “voluntary trust fund” will be established to assist those countries that need help from UN peacekeepers or other regional forces to disarm their citizens.

Arguably, the Arms Trade Treaty would become the law of the United States if the Senate were to ratify the treaty.

While that is the process that the Constitution establishes for the implementation of treaties, fundamental principles of construction and constitutional law dictate that no treaty that violates the Constitution can become the supreme law of the land.

In the case of the UN’s Arms Trade Treaty, there is no doubt that regardless of presidential signatures or congressional consent, this treaty cannot pass constitutional muster and therefore will never be the valid law of the land. 

Unless, of course, Americans once again acquiesce to President Obama’s assumption of illegal authority and relinquish their rights and weapons regardless of the reasons they should not do so.

Finally, citizens must understand a very important nuance of Secretary Kerry’s assurance in his speech that the Arms Trade Treaty isn’t about taking away freedom, “it is about keeping weapons out of the hands of terrorists and rogue actors.” Americans must remember that Kerry, Obama, and the UN consider gun owners to be “terrorists” and “rogue actors,” thus subject to seizure of their firearms in the name of “international peace and global security.”

For John Kerry and Barack Obama, the confiscation of weapons from civilians is an act of, as Kerry said Wednesday, “advancing important humanitarian goals.” 

For Americans, however, it is a giant leap toward enslavement.

Americans would be wise at this critical time to remember the words of George Washington, who advised:

A free people ought not only to be armed and disciplined, but they should have sufficient arms and ammunition to maintain a status of independence from any who might attempt to abuse them, which would include their own government.

 

Joe A. Wolverton, II, J.D. is a correspondent for The New American and travels frequently nationwide speaking on topics of nullification, the NDAA, and the surveillance state.  He is the host of The New American Review radio show that is simulcast on Youtube every Monday. He can be reached at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Photo of John Kerry signing Arms Trade Treaty as UN Under Secretary-General for Legal Affairs Miguel Serpa Soares looks on: AP Images

Related articles:

Final Version of Arms Trade Treaty Released; Disarmament of Civilians on Track

Global Gun Grab on Track Following UN Arms Trade Treaty Conference (Video)

Religious, Civil Rights Group Urge Obama to Sign Arms Trade Treaty

5 comments

  • Comment Link Ibn Thursday, 26 September 2013 16:53 posted by Ibn

    Those who think Congress will not allow confiscation of our arms or Americans will not give up their arms are living in fools paradise. No branch of government will protect us for all are corrupt to the core. Our federal, state and local governments have been violating our constitutional rights for decades and it is getting worse by the hours. Vast majority of Americans depend on government assistance in one form or another. They will never go against the government for they are corrupted. Their blood has been adulterated. These people have lost sense of shame. Don't expect help from them.

    The minority will have to make sure that it is not oppressed by the majority. Time and again it has been proven that no branch of the government can be trusted. Executive orders by the Presidents, unconstitutional legislation by Congress and most of all failure of Supreme Court to understand constitution undermines our liberties. If you cannot rely on Supreme Court who is left to help us? The minority has to stick together, make itself stronger and make it clear to the majority that it will not give up its God given rights and would push back even harder if pushed. It is human nature that he listens to the one who has power. Like Ben Franklin said, "We must all hang together, or assuredly we shall all hang separately."

  • Comment Link sirburban Thursday, 26 September 2013 12:20 posted by sirburban

    One of the most prophetic warnings of Robert Welch would be the threat to freedom coming from the United Nations. Many good people in the conservative cause were puzzled. "why concern ourselves with a 'paper tiger' when it's the international communist conspiracy that is the biggest threat to freedom?

    Welch saw the UN as pro-communist and saw the UN as an organization founded by an inner circular of "Insiders" in the US who would use the UN to gradually impose socialism on the entire planet and then proceed on to disarm all civilian populations.

    When he persuaded 11 men in Indianapolis in 1958 to help him found the counter force to international collectivism represented by communism, he knew that the "diplomats" at the UN were facilitators of the socialist/communist combine.

    Welch said that the efforts we put into this fight would be worth the time and money since by leaving the UN we would break the back of America's enemies. That agenda item is still key to winning the war for freedom.

    This latest UN treacherous scheme will remind those who were once puzzled by the slogan they saw on billboards along the highways: "get the US out of the United Nation!"

  • Comment Link Rocky Wednesday, 25 September 2013 19:37 posted by Rocky

    Hanoi John can forget it. Americans will never hand over their guns without a fight. If the government wants to start a shooting revolution, this is the way to do it !

  • Comment Link rprew Wednesday, 25 September 2013 18:54 posted by rprew

    "This Constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land;" Article VI, paragraph 2

    Congress cannot make a treaty regarding an issue on which they have no authority to act. Since the UN Arms Trade Treaty runs counter to the Constitution, it is of no effect. Any member of the Senate who votes to ratify this treaty, or any president (or his duly appointed representative, such as a Secretary of State) who tries to enforce the same are committing criminal offenses.

  • Comment Link Nora Wednesday, 25 September 2013 18:05 posted by Nora

    This is an act of treason. It is time for America to remove Obama and Kerry from power, and wage war on the war system itself, the societal engineers who believe they have a right to impose their will on us.

Please Log In To Comment
Log in