The situation in Connecticut continues to unravel as responses to serious questions about enforcement of the state's new gun law aren't being answered consistently.
With radical U.S. government and United Nations schemes such as “sustainable development” and UN Agenda 21 being quietly implemented across America at all levels of government under a variety of names and pretexts, lawmakers in the Oklahoma House of Representatives voted overwhelmingly this week for legislation to protect the unalienable rights to private property and due process in the state. The “Oklahoma Community Protection Act,” which would nullify Agenda 21 and other outside assaults on individual rights in the state, now goes to the Oklahoma Senate.
A committee of the Arizona state Senate passed a bill that would prevent the enforcement of any federal attempt at indefinite detention in that state, including the NDAA.
If the state of Connecticut increases pressure on gun owners to register their weapons, the consequences could be greater than imagined.
On Tuesday the Supreme Court ruled that when a resident who objects to the search of his residence is removed through a lawful arrest, the remaining resident may give police consent to search without a warrant.
When it comes to banning the advertising of food in public schools, the First Amendment apparently doesn't apply.
Rampant government violations of the U.S. Bill of Rights are an indication that the Bill of Rights is facing greater threat today under manufactured “necessity” than ever before in American history.
Supporters of the Article V constitutional convention claim that this is the only solution to our current problem of federal overreach.
Bills nullifying federal gun restrictions are working their way through the state legislatures of Missouri and Arizona.