Saturday, 15 December 2012 13:30

Connecticut School Shooting: What We Know

Written by 

A 20-year-old man clad in combat gear and armed with a pair of handguns entered an elementary school in central Connecticut on the morning of Friday, December 14, killing 26 people, 20 of them children between the ages of five and ten.

Police said the shooter, identified as Adam Lanza, shot his mother at her home, and then made his way to the school where she had worked, Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut, where he killed the 20 students, along with six school employees, before killing himself.

The New York Times reported that the school's principal, identified as Dawn Hochsprung, had permitted Lanza to enter the building after she recognized him as the son of a colleague. Moments later Hochsprung was killed by Lanza as she went to investigate the sound of gunshots down the hall. The school psychologist, Mary Sherlach, was also among the adults killed, as was Victoria Soto, a first-grade teacher who apparently placed herself in front of some of her students to shield them, and was killed as a result.

The Times described the shooter as “chillingly accurate,” leaving only one wounded survivor. “All the others hit by the barrage of bullets from the guns Mr. Lanza carried ... died, suggesting that they were shot at point-blank range,” reported the Times.

Lt. J. Paul Vance, a spokesman for the Connecticut State Police, said the shootings occurred in two classrooms in one section of the single-story facility. Vance said that 18 of the students were killed at the scene, with two others dying later at a local hospital. All six of the school employes died at the scene.

The Associated Press reported that Lanza was thought to have had mental illness and lived with his mother, Nancy Lanza. After shooting his mother at her home, Lanza drove to the school in her car with three weapons, which police said appeared to have been registered to his mother. While he left one gun, a high-powered rifle, in the car, he took in a pair of handguns which he used in the shootings.

AP reported that as Lanza began the shooting, “a custodian ran through the halls, warning of a gunman, and someone switched on the intercom, perhaps saving many lives by letting them hear the chaos in the school office.... Teachers locked their doors and ordered children to huddle in a corner or hide in closets as shots echoed through the building.”

The Times described Newtown as “a postcard-perfect New England town where everyone seems to know everyone else and where there had lately been holiday tree lightings with apple cider and hot chocolate.” But with the killings the community “was plunged into mourning. Stunned residents attended four memorial services in the town on Friday evening as detectives continued the search for clues, and an explanation.”

At Newtown's St. Rose of Lima church, one of the congregations to hold services after the tragedy, Monsignor Robert Weiss said Mass, remembering the young victims. “These 20 children were just beautiful, beautiful children,” he said. “These 20 children lit up this community better than all these Christmas lights we have.... There are a lot brighter stars up there tonight because of these kids.”

AP reported that the shooting, which followed days after a gunman killed two people and himself at an Oregon shopping mall, ranked among the deadliest in U.S. history, and was “second in victims only to the 2007 Virginia Tech massacre, which left 33 people dead, including the gunman.”

As news of the tragedy began filling the news, President Obama stepped forward to add his sadness and outrage to the national dialogue. “The majority of those who died today were children, beautiful little kids between the ages of five and ten years old,” said Obama, with a demonstration of emotion. “They had their entire lives ahead of them — birthdays, graduations, weddings, kids of their own. Among the fallen were also teachers — men and women who devoted their lives to helping our children fulfill their dreams.”

He added that “our hearts are broken for the parents of the survivors as well, for as blessed as they are to have their children home tonight, they know that their children’s innocence has been torn away from them too early, and there are no words that will ease their pain.”

That comment segued into a predictable suggestion by the president that “something” must be done to stop such gun violence — that something most likely being a renewed attempt at tightened federal control of guns. “As a country, we have been through this too many times,” said Obama. “Whether it’s an elementary school in Newtown, or a shopping mall in Oregon, or a temple in Wisconsin, or a movie theater in Aurora, or a street corner in Chicago — these neighborhoods are our neighborhoods, and these children are our children. And we're going to have to come together and take meaningful action to prevent more tragedies like this, regardless of the politics.”

Gun control proponents enthusiastically took to the streets to add their voices to the call for action. In Washington, D.C., members of the Coalition to Stop Gun Violence gathered in front of the White House, with some protesters chanting, “Today is the day” to move ahead with gun control. In a quickly cobbled press release, the group declared that as a result of the latest shootings, “Americans must demand immediate action by our President and Congress to reform our gun laws. This must include legislation requiring background checks on all gun sales, strengthening those background checks ... and renewing the ban on military-style assault weapons and high-capacity ammunition magazines.”

Ron Pinciaro, head of the group Connecticut Against Gun Violence, took the stage to agree that federal control was the only answer — even as he acknowledged that Connecticut already has strong gun-control laws. Yet, in his mind, beefing up federal laws would be more effective than his state's already-existing gun-control laws. “We have some of the strongest gun laws in the United States,” he said. “But if you don’t have strong federal gun laws, that makes it that much more difficult.”

But Larry Pratt, head of Gun Owners of America, observes that gun-control advocates bear responsibility for the targeting of easy prey in government-mandated gun-free zones. “I would say there's blood on their hands because they were the ones that supported the gun free zones that are the law in almost every state of our country around schools,” Pratt was quoted by as saying. “In the last 20 years, every single mass murder of five people or more has taken place in a gun free zone. Now, at some point we've got to ask, 'Is there a better way?'”

Pratt noted that when law-abiding citizens have guns and are prepared to use them to defend themselves and others, such shootings as happened in Connecticut, Oregon, Columbine, and elsewhere become much less prevalent. “Once somebody is in a public place and they have a gun other than in their holster, then people are going to be on alert. And if they see that the gun is being pointed at somebody, out comes their own gun, and maybe they can take care of business in time. If they don't have a gun, they can't do anything.”

Photo of children from Sandy Hook Elementary School: AP Images


  • Comment Link sandy Friday, 18 January 2013 00:41 posted by sandy

    I'd like to see a follow up piece on this story, with a look into the discrepancies of the narrative, and the several indications that this murder rampage appears to have been orchestrated by more than just "the shooter".

    Why were there 4 (possibly 5) documented Sandy Hook memorial pgs set up at posted on the net PRIOR to December 14th?

    Why were the "parents of S.H. students" exact clones of Mr and Mrs. Sexton of Florida, and Jennifer Greenberg-Sexton is registered as a crisis actor?

    Why was the rifle identified as the weapon used found locked in the trunk, while handguns were scattered throughout the building?

    Why was one of the little victims, Emily Parker, then shown posing in a photo with Obama after the event?

    A number of questions, worthy of being asked and answered.

  • Comment Link Cory Beevers Sunday, 16 December 2012 14:16 posted by Cory Beevers

    I also believe the timing of these events is noteworthy.I wonder if the shooter was on anti-depressants. If so ,the controlled media would tell us wouldn't they? Or would the all-powerfull pharmaceutical companies not like that? If just one of the adults would have been armed, they could have saved most ,if not all of those children. Is that too complicated? I rest my case!

  • Comment Link Todd Saturday, 15 December 2012 20:37 posted by Todd

    Not sure about the ‘hate crime’ thing Frank. They already have that. More likely, they’ll use this for the usual useless “assault weapon” and mag ban, and/ possibly a psychological screening for permits. As it is, a single prior felony, dishonorable discharge, confinement for a psychological disorder (20 yrs prior), or being caught making a single death threat will permanently remove your ability to buy a gun. Psychological screening would bog the already lengthy handgun permit process even more, and place the qualification process into a vague and imprecise realm where arbitrary determinations will more likely subvert any possible structured analysis process and more likely generate a ‘fail’ than a ‘pass’. In other words, most would be denied a permit. Exactly what the banners want.

  • Comment Link Todd Saturday, 15 December 2012 17:53 posted by Todd

    Connecticut has instant background check (all gun purchases), waiting periods, mandatory training, storage lock / accessibility laws, owner accountability, ever-hostile legislators and bureaucrats, gun-free school zones and a very difficult, expensive and lengthy (2-3 months) three phase local, state and federal background checking process for pistol permits and none of it stopped a thing, here or anywhere else. I was less than 30 miles away when it happened. I was armed. If I had been there with my pistol, its possible I could have stopped him. Perhaps they should allow the teachers concealed carry.

    Nothing suggested by Pinciaro or the ‘Coalition’ would work. As can be seen, the rifle was left in the car, and small capacity mags take 3 seconds to change. And a homemade frag device is easy to make and would have done as much. That they used what was available, does not mean they wouldn’t have resorted to other more lethal implements. Thousands of people are being brutally murdered by gangs in South Africa since they banned guns there. The gangs are still armed, or use machetes. Serial numbers have shown that many guns were confiscated more than once (figure it out).

  • Comment Link Todd Saturday, 15 December 2012 17:43 posted by Todd

    It sort of strange how these things seem to happen right around the same time as talks and/or proposals to install a new gun control measures occur - in this case the UN arms trade treaty. Anyone else notice that, or am I way off base here ?

    How odd also that a mother would leave her guns accessible to her son, known to be mentally ill. It’s a shame that she’s dead because she would have been questioned and/or charged for that.

    “Combat gear” - Sometimes I wonder if the ‘call of duty’ type video games may be affecting young minds who become completely absorbed by them, even as adults. They devalue and desensitize minds to the concept of life, bloodshed, pain and tragedy. They think its all a game. I’m not saying every kid will become a murderer, but an occasional few might not fully realize that the realities are not funny and not a game. Add illicit drug usage possibly, which numbs minds to consequences; even some prescription anti-depressants will cause this. I’ve had my own experiences with that and can certainly testify to the consequence-numbing effect of at least one anti-depressant. I’ll never take them again.

  • Comment Link Frank M. Pelteson Saturday, 15 December 2012 15:59 posted by Frank M. Pelteson

    Can't anybody see that the powers-that-be are intensively searching out the intentions of the perpetrator? This is evident by the day-after-day, hour-after-hour television programs on this subject?

    Why do you think that they are doing that?

    Doesn't it make you conclude that they are forging "thought-crime" or "hate-crime" legislation?

  • Comment Link REMant Saturday, 15 December 2012 15:51 posted by REMant

    Newtown is something of a greater NYC bedroom community, and I have to shake my head every time I read the Monsignor's statement. Can't the Catholics stop mythologizing everything?

Please Log In To Comment
Log in