Monday, 10 February 2014 17:45

War on Drugs Claims SWAT Team Member Using No-Knock Warrant

Written by 

Hank McGee should be thankful that he didn’t wind up dead or dreadfully disabled in the no-knock raid that took place on his trailer house in Texas early Thursday morning, December 19. Instead, reacting in fear that he was being robbed, he grabbed his pistol and shot and killed a SWAT team member. On Thursday, February 6, a grand jury in Burleson County declined to indict him for murder, the first time in recent memory such a verdict had been handed down, according to McGee’s attorney, Dick DeGuerin.

DeGuerin added that the jury's verdict was just because McGee thought someone was breaking into his home, where he and his girlfriend were living:

We felt that the grand jury acted fairly and reasonably and had all of the information that it needed to make the decision that it did: that this was a justified shooting.

But we need to say that this is a tragedy.

It need not have happened. [The SWAT team] could have walked up to his house in the daylight and he would have let them in, or they could have stopped him as he left his house to go to the store.

The no-knock warrant was issued the day before by a judge who had been persuaded by an informant that McGee was growing marijuana inside his house, and that he had a cache of rifles and pistols there as well. Deputy Adam Sowders, who died at the scene, told the judge that giving McGee advance warning of the raid would be “dangerous, futile, or would inhibit effective investigation.”

This is in line with the Supreme Court’s ruling in United States v. McConney stating that “exigent circumstances” could override Fourth Amendment guarantees for a probable-cause search warrant “particularly describing the place to be searched and the persons or things to be seized” in the ordinary way. In McConney the court held that exigent or emergency circumstances that allow otherwise unconstitutional warrants are,

those circumstances that would cause a reasonable person to believe that entry (or other relevant prompt action) was necessary to prevent physical harm to the officers or other persons, the destruction of relevant evidence, the escape of a suspect, or some other consequence [that would] improperly frustrate … legitimate law enforcement efforts.

Despite being let off by the grand jury on murder charges, McGee is not in the clear from a legal standpoint; he is out on bond pending other charges being brought by the district attorney, charges that the DA intends to prosecute to the full extent of the law. Said the DA:

December 19, 2013 was a tragic day for the Sowders’ family and Burleson County, Texas. Investigator Sergeant Adam Sowders was a law enforcement officer who was passionate about serving his community. He was generous, respectful and admired in Burleson County and by our office.

The events on December 19, 2013 are tragic. In my opinion, the Burleson County Sheriff’s Office did nothing illegal by securing and executing a “no knock” search warrant that day. I believe the evidence also shows that an announcement was made. However, there is not enough evidence that Mr. Magee knew that day that Peace Officers were entering his home. The events occurred in a matter of seconds amongst chaos.

The self-defense laws in Texas are viewed in the mindset of the actor, not the victim, which allows for tragedies to occur when one party is acting lawfully, but it can be reasonably seen as a threat of deadly force by another.

However, the Burleson County Sheriff’s Office would not have been there that day if Mr. Magee had not decided to live a lifestyle of doing and producing illegal drugs in his home. Therefore, we will fully prosecute the drug charges against him. This event should wake the community up that drug crimes are not victimless.

If convicted of these lesser charges, McGee could spend the next two to five years in jail. But at least he’s alive.

Kathryn Johnson wasn’t so lucky. In similar circumstances, when a no-knock warrant, also based on an informant’s tip that hers was a drug house, was served by a SWAT team breaking down her door in 2006, she reached for her legally owned gun and fired off several rounds, wounding three officers before they returned fire and killed her.

Or McGee could have suffered the ghastly miscarriage of justice that was visited upon Tracy Ingle, who was asleep when he heard his front door being crushed at the same time his bedroom window was being smashed by SWAT team members using a no-knock warrant. Thinking his home was being invaded by thugs, Ingle grabbed a non-working gun to defend himself. Said Ingle:

I could see that they weren’t robbers, so I threw my gun down. A second later I heard one of the police officers say, “He’s got a … gun” … and he started shooting.

Ingle might have wished he had been killed to avoid the agony of what followed in the aftermath. From the Arkansas Times’ eight-page report on the incident:

He knew he had been shot, Ingle said, and his first instinct was to try to get off the bed — away from the window, at least, where the two officers were now pouring fire into the room. As Ingle tried, he got tangled up in the blankets and his ruined leg folded under him, the shattered bone grating inside. He fell to the floor in agony.

As he fell, the officers outside the window kept shooting, hitting him four more times — arm, calf, hip and chest. The round that hit him in the chest is still there, too close to his heart to be removed.

Days later, Ingle's brother, Eric, would dig four more bullets out of a space heater that was only a foot from where Ingle's head lay, and spackle up nine bullet holes in the wall over Tracy's bed. Some of those rounds had gone completely through and into the bathroom on the other side of the wall, two of them blowing ragged holes through both sides of a plywood shelf. 

Finally, the shooting stopped.

“After that,” Ingle said, “all the police rushed in, and were standing over me and calling me Michael. They kept calling me Michael or Mike, and I wouldn't answer them. One of them asked me why I wouldn't answer them, and I said, ‘My name's not Mike.' I don't remember much after that except them taking me out of the house to an ambulance.”   

The number of no-knock raids has escalated to more than 40,000 a year according to Bradley Balko, author of Overkill: The Rise of Paramilitary Police Raids in America and increases the likelihood of additional confrontations between SWAT teams operating under no-knock warrants and innocents who find themselves being targeted at home. As Balko wrote in his introduction:

Americans have long maintained that a man’s home is his castle and that he has the right to defend it from unlawful intruders.

Unfortunately, that right may be disappearing.

Jacob Sullum, a Forbes contributor, commented on McGee’s remarkable grand jury dismissal of an indictment for killing Officer Sowders during that botched raid:

[Sowder’s] death is doubly senseless: because violence is not an appropriate response to cultivation of an arbitrarily proscribed plant and because, even if we take pot prohibition as a given, there is no need to enforce it by breaking down people’s doors while they are sleeping, a tactic that inevitably results in tragedies like this one.

A graduate of Cornell University and a former investment advisor, Bob is a regular contributor to The New American magazine and blogs frequently at, primarily on economics and politics. He can be reached at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. .


  • Comment Link Tionico Tuesday, 11 February 2014 11:34 posted by Tionico

    I find it rather significant that thre very officer who pled to the court (in seeking the warrant, and its "no knock" category) stating the target would be "dangerous" if approached the normal way, is the same one who took the bullet when they did their smash and crash entry charade. It is sad he is dead, yet I can't help but think some sort of justice was served. I am particularly glad one of his fellow officers is not the one who fell on account of the unethical pleas for the no-knock status.

    I also have high praise for the restraint showed by the rest of the break-in crew. All too often once the shooting starts it doesn't end until all the officers have empty guns and there is nothing left alive in the place. Waco, also (interestingly enough) in Texas, is the extreme, as is the sickening case of Jose Guereño in New Mexico.
    How many more officers and innocents (as we ALL are until proven guilty in a court of law) will fall in these dangerous and illegal "no knock" entries? Will LE finally realise they are almost all unnecessary and stop pushing for them? Will the courts press for ever increasing substantiation of the specific need before issuing them? Or will citizens, fearful for the safety of us all, begin implementing counter measures to further increase the pressure against them?
    This Grand Jury took one small step in the right direction. I believe this is the first time a civilian has killed an officer and not been either immediately killed by his fellows or indicted, tried, convicted, sentenced for enhanced crime purely on the basis that the "victim" was encased in a government issued costume, and bore a small piece of government issued jewelry and carried a government issued gun.

    WHAT will it take for law enforcement to wake up and realise thay DO serve we the people, not the other way round?

  • Comment Link MemphisMickey Tuesday, 11 February 2014 11:11 posted by MemphisMickey

    They had a warrant? Perhaps the no-know issue needs to be resolved. Warrants are Constitutional!

  • Comment Link Michael Dalene Tuesday, 11 February 2014 09:46 posted by Michael Dalene

    A criminal wearing a badge is killed, a innocent victim is Victimized twice, and yet somehow being a lawful Gang-member is to be Honored... Why?

    The use, sale, etc. of any drug is a Constitutional Right which an amendment similar to the 19th (Prohibition) failed. The Right to be secure in one's person, houses, papers, and effects, is also a Right which is illegally violated 100's of thousands of times a day by criminals acting under "the color of law." If police would truly "enforce" the laws they are Sworn to enforce they would jail the judges and politicians, just as those Officers and Enlisted in the Armed Forces would train their weapons upon the national and State Capitols and Order the politicians to surrender and face Charges of Treason, conspiracy, fraud--- and a laundry list of crimes so vast that those which each is GUILTY would fill a city block and rich from Earths' core to the Moon...

  • Comment Link malcolm kyle Tuesday, 11 February 2014 03:34 posted by malcolm kyle

    Yet another law enforcement officer dies while attempting to uphold a failed public policy that has triggered the worst crime wave in history.

    Yet another law enforcement officer dies while attempting to prevent a citizen of this 'once proud and free' nation from choosing to self-medicate with one of God's most amazing plants.

    Yet another law enforcement officer dies in order that unconscionable Transnational Corporations, and their Media Enablers, can continue to abuse, addict and poison us for obscene profits.

    According to the CATO Institute, ending prohibition would save roughly $41 billion of expenditure while generating an estimated $46 billion in tax revenues.

    Prohibition has helped fill our Prisons and Jails to capacity. Violent criminals, murderers, rapists and child molesters are released early to create space for so called 'drug offenders'. Half of court trial time and also a huge chunk of police officers time is pointlessly wasted. Enormous untaxed profits from illegal drugs fund multi-national criminal empires which bribe law enforcement authorities and spread corruption faster than a raging bush fire. Prohibition takes violent criminals and turns them into multi-billionaires whilst corrupting even entire countries, including our own.

  • Comment Link Old Mullet Monday, 10 February 2014 23:32 posted by Old Mullet

    With over "40,000" "no knock entries", who can be safe in their home? How should an honest citizen legally react to bashed in doors and crashed through windows in the middle of the night? After the shock out of sleep and into a defense mode to protect one's self, family, and home, why should someone hearing a yelling "police" (or whatever they yell) believe them? Rather than law enforcement, Gestapo tactics come to mind when this horrible action is incurred. What has happened to our Constitutional right of "innocent until PROVEN guilty"? Forty thousand; really? One is way too many. So, punish this man "to the full extent of the law" because he legally defended his home.

Please Log In To Comment
Log in