U.S. Headlines
- Bill Authorizes Use of Unmanned Drones in U.S. Airspace
- Reid Poised to Introduce Yet Another Internet Bill
- Regulatory Agencies Continue to Slow the Economy
- Federal Court Rules Against Traditional Marriage in California
- Congress Probes “Green Energy” Loans, Wasted “Stimulus”
- Former Congresswoman Regrets ObamaCare Vote; Unaware of Contraceptive Mandate
Some ads are provided by Google
They are not endorsed by The New American
| ACORN: No Business Like Poverty Business | | Print | |
| Written by Gregory A. Hession, J.D. |
| Sunday, 02 November 2008 06:00 |
|
ACORN proves the axiom of the modern welfare state — that there's no business like the poverty business. Although ACORN runs a large conglomerate of social-activist anti-poverty front groups out of a New Orleans hub, it is registered as a nonprofit corporation in Arkansas, which does not require financial disclosure. This has allowed it keep its own finances shielded from public scrutiny, while demanding transparency from all others. The group's nonprofit status refers only to its corporate form. That is, ACORN must be organized for a public purpose and have no stockholders, unlike a regular corporation. However, it is not tax exempt under federal law, since it does advocacy and lobbying that would run afoul of IRS restrictions, such as endorsing political candidates. The New York Times has estimated that the ACORN empire takes in at least $37.5 million a year, not counting its many nonprofit subsidiaries. A number of other sources of income — such as union payments, get-out-the-vote program fees, and housing organizations — were not included in that figure, so the total may likely be many tens of millions higher. Aaron Dorfman, executive director of the National Committee for Responsive Philanthropy (NCRP) and a former ACORN executive, estimates that the total budget for ACORN and all its affiliates was over $40 million as long ago as the year 2000. Just one of its nonprofits, ACORN Housing Corp, Inc., took in almost $50 million in donations between 1993 and 2004, not counting its revenue-producing projects. No information appears to be available on the personal wealth or property of any of the Rathke family members. One of the Rathke's methods of deriving personal profit went a little further than just obfuscation and secret deals. ACORN officials have recently admitted that Dale Rathke embezzled $948,607.50 from ACORN and its affiliated organizations in 1999 and 2000. However, ACORN insiders decided to keep the situation quiet and not alert law enforcement. Incredibly, Dale Rathke remained on ACORN's payroll until June of this year, when the scandal forced the resignation of both Dale and his brother Wade from ACORN. Two board members are now suing Wade Rathke for the coverup, and a criminal investigation is possible. Wade is, however, still working for an ACORN international affiliate. Organizers will be responsible for collecting petition signatures from registered Missouri voters. Organizers are responsible for collecting 200 petitions a day and working up to 80 hours over 7 days of work.... Grounds for termination include drug or alcohol abuse on the job and not meeting the quota. [Emphasis added.] Such hours would be illegal under state or federal wage and hour laws, or any union contract. As this writer reported in an earlier installment in this series, unions are not allowed in ACORN, although the organization sponsors many projects to organize workers into unions. Rathke won't even allow the employees of his own union to be unionized. When the staff of the Rathke-led New Orleans Local 100 of Service Employees International Union wanted to be unionized, he organized a union-busting effort and thwarted it. Like the "greedy" businesses he targets, busting the union allowed him to keep much more money than if he paid the higher-than-market wages that his union demands of others. The ACORN view of businesses — excepting, of course, the ones that it runs — is set out in its "People's Platform" document: Corporations shall have their role: Producing jobs, providing products, paying taxes. No more. No less. They shall obey our wishes, respond to our needs, serve our communities. This class-envy rhetoric demonstrates woeful ignorance of the origins of the wealth that ACORN wishes to share in, as though such enterprises should be compelled to bow to the wishes of those who are not responsible for producing the wealth. The business of harassing business appears to be good business for ACORN. It routinely runs Jesse-Jackson-style corporate shakedowns, which often result in corporate "contributions" or partnerships in which ACORN is paid to provide "education" to the target. One example of many is Household Finance Corporation, which was targeted by ACORN and eventually ended up paying ACORN to run a program to educate people about mortgages and loan terms. It also gets sweetheart deals to join in land development and housing projects such as Forest City Ratner's giant Atlantic Yards project in Brooklyn, New York, where it will profit from marketing "affordable" housing units. This article is the final installment in a four-part series on ACORN. The other articles are "The Roots of ACORN," "Disenfranchising Voters," and "War on the Poor." Trackback(0)
Comments (0)
![]() Write comment
This content has been locked. You can no longer post any comment.
|





ACORN's website asserts that it "is the largest grassroots community organization in the United States, comprised of over 450,000 member families organized into 1000+ neighborhood chapters in over 100 cities across the country. The mission of ACORN is to empower low and moderate-income people by building effective and solidly rooted organizations capable of winning concrete improvements for low-income communities." Not exactly.
