| Bush Unwittingly Sums Up His Presidency | | Print | |
| Written by Thomas R. Eddlem | ||||||||||||
| Tuesday, 13 January 2009 05:50 | ||||||||||||
|
He also made several statements reiterating the painfully obvious, like a middle school student replying to the teacher after not studying for a civics quiz: A definition of a sustainable cease-fire is that Hamas stops firing rockets into Bush even made reporters attending the press conference recall his words on the FY05 Defense Appropriations Act. At that time, Bush said: “Our enemies are innovative and resourceful, and so are we. They never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people, and neither do we.” Bush spoke about the challenges Barack Obama will face as President. But out of his mouth came words that could be understood two entirely different ways: “The stakes are high. There is an enemy that still is out there. You know, people can maybe try to write that off as, you know, he's trying to set something up. I'm telling you there's an enemy that would like to attack America, Americans, again. There just is. That's the reality of the world. And I wish him all the very best.” Reporters asked Bush what the disappointments of his presidency were. Verbal malapropisms were not among the disappointments he listed. Instead, he said: “Not having weapons of mass destruction was a significant disappointment. I don't know if you want to call those mistakes or not, but they were — things didn't go according to plan, let's put it that way.” And you thought Bush didn’t want Saddam Hussein to have weapons of mass destruction? No, it was a “disappointment.” But don’t criticize Bush for such disappointments, because he won’t get any new information after making a decision. At least that’s what he told reporters: One thing about the presidency is that you can make — only make decisions, you know, on the information at hand. You don't get to have information after you've made the decision. Is it possible that the White House staff withheld information from Bush after the decision to go into Iraq? It almost sounds like that’s what Bush is saying. Would that explain the mess in the Middle East, the record deficit, and the emergent economic depression? But the best summary of the eight years of his presidency came from this statement of free market principles. “And I readily concede I chunked aside some of my free market principles when I was told by chief economic advisors that the situation we were facing could be worse than the Great Depression.” The only way a free-market constitutionalist could criticize the statement, other than the grammar, would be to question whether Bush ever held free-market principles in the first place. He did not support free-market principles when he lobbied Congress for his prescription drup entitlement program, or his stimulus plan, or the $700 billion bailout of the financial institutions. His record reveals no evidence he ever possessed free-market principles to “chunk.”
— Photo: whitehouse.gov
Set as favorite
Email This
Trackback(0)
Comments (3)
![]()
William Grigg
said:
|
|
... “`Chunked'? Yes, he used the word `chunked.' The press conference was full of Bushisms like this. He told the press that `Sometimes you misunderestimated me.' Misunderestimated. He also made several statements reiterating the painfully obvious, like a middle school student replying to the teacher after not studying for a civics quiz.... His record reveals no evidence he ever possessed free-market principles to `chunk.'" Mr. Bush leaves office as he came in -- swaggering under the burden of his unearned self-regard, and blissfully indifferent to the legitimate needs of the country he misruled for eight years. He's a bit like the figure from the Book of Isaiah, before whom the world is as lovely as the Garden of Eden, behind whom there is nothing but desolation and ruin. It's a welcome development, I suppose, that conservative Republicans are finally willing to admit the truth addressed in this article, namely that Bush presided over an unprecedented rush toward corporate socialism and financial ruin. How typical of Republicans that they would admit this unpalatable truth only after Bush's presidency had effectively ended. Tom did a terrific job of digesting this issue into a brief, pithy, witty essay. How refreshing, by the way, to see that Tom was permitted to take proper notice of Mr. Bush's intellectual limitations; I seem to recall that a TNA writer got fired for doing that kind of thing a couple of years ago. |
|
Tom Waller
said:
|
Who is that writer? William Grigg - who is the writer that got fired? Without knowing, I assume it was you? |
|
Thomas Katama
said:
|
Mr. Born into the privileged bush family, but drawn to the wild side....Crazy FRAT guy......... (Outlaw) Cowboy, but Right with G-d.......... His unwitting governance brought ruin to the endeavors he pursued... He is responsible for the DEATHS of two or three HUNDRED THOUSAND women and children.. To see him at his best, joking about the game he played and won on the WMD's that led to five hundred thousand fatalities in Iraq, See .... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o9EbssUgHj4 Is W just a moron or is he a psychopath. or maybe he's BOTH, like some twisted child that enjoys pulling the wings off of butterflys... One thing is certain, the American people were complicit with him...his wars......His murder, torture and expropriation policies to an extent at least equal to that of the populace under the third reich of hitler....... Just another greedy despot BUTCHER bloodying the pages of history...................... but ONE of the FIRST to have most of his CRIMES recorded live, in REALTIME for courts and historians to see for ALL time |
|




President Bush unwittingly summed up the eight years of his presidency in what was expected to be the final 
