Wednesday, 20 June 2012 09:18

Ron Paul Promises to Block Military Operations in Syria

Written by 

On Tuesday Representative Ron Paul (R-Texas) rose to speak in the House of Representatives and promised to thwart any effort by the president to initiate military operations in Syria without a formal congressional declaration of war, as required by the Constitution:

This week I am introducing legislation to prohibit the Administration, absent a declaration of war by Congress, from supporting — directly or indirectly — any military or paramilitary operations in Syria,” the constitutionally consistent congressman declared.

Sounding almost biblical in his address, Paul said that “Plans, rumors, and war propaganda for attacking Syria and deposing Assad have been around for many months.” Of course this is as true as the mainstream media that is often nothing more than an organ of the Establishment has been prepping the American people for that for some time.

Decrying all of the foreign conflicts into which the United States has entangled itself, Paul continued his speech, saying:

The total waste of those wars should cause us to pause before this all-out effort at occupation and regime change is initiated against Syria. There are no national security concerns that require such a foolish escalation of violence in the Middle East. There should be no doubt that our security interests are best served by completely staying out of the internal strife now raging in Syria.

The amount of American blood and treasure spilled already on the altar of global “security,” is unconscionable. 

For example, the illegal wars in Iraq and Afghanistan siphon about $13 billion per month from the U.S. Treasury. Since the attacks of September 11, 2001, estimates are that Congress has approved a total of $1.283 trillion in military operations, base security, reconstruction, foreign aid, embassy costs, and veterans’ health care spread over three operations: Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF) Afghanistan and other counter terror operations; Operation Noble Eagle (ONE), providing enhanced security at military bases; and Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF).

The human cost of building the American empire is much higher still. Estimates put the number of American troops killed in action in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Pakistan at over 6,000, with the number of civilian dead approaching 138,000.

The relevant question for Ron Paul and for all friends of liberty is: Has the sacrifice of all those lives made the world a safer place?

Another important question asked by Paul in his House address was, “From where does a president get such authority?”

"Since World War II the proper authority to go to war has been ignored. It has been replaced by international entities like the United Nations and NATO, or the President himself, while ignoring the Congress. And sadly, the people don't object," Paul lamented.

"Our recent presidents explicitly maintain that the authority to go to war is not the U.S. Congress. This has been the case since 1950 when we were taken into war in Korea under UN Resolution and without congressional approval," he continued.

What perhaps Representative Paul didn’t know at the time he was making his speech from the floor of the House is that Ron Paul’s fellow Republican and a man who may be the next U.S. president shares the view of the “recent presidents” spoken of by Paul.

Appearing with Bob Schieffer on Sunday’s Face the Nation, Republican presidential candidate and “presumptive nominee” Mitt Romney said that if he is elected in November, he would not need congressional approval to start a war with Iran.

Specifically, Romney said:

I can assure you if I'm president, the Iranians will have no question but that I will be willing to take military action if necessary to prevent them from becoming a nuclear threat to the world. I don't believe at this stage, therefore, if I'm president that we need to have a war powers approval or special authorization for military force. The president has that capacity now. I understand that some in the Senate for instance have written letters to the president indicating you should know that a containment strategy is unacceptable. We cannot survive a course of action which would include a nuclear Iran. We must be willing to take any and all actions.

Many of Representative Paul’s followers question how Romney’s stance differs significantly from that of President Obama, who famously exercised these imagined “war powers” to initiate military action in Yemen, Libya, and likely Syria.

Speaking of Iran, Paul recognizes in his speech that daily our country is moving inexorably closer to armed conflict with that nation:

Most knowledgeable people now recognize that the planned war against Syria is merely the next step to take on the Iranian government, something the neo-cons openly admit. Controlling Iranian oil, just as we have done in Saudi Arabia and are attempting to do in Iraq, is the real goal of the neo-conservatives who have been in charge of our foreign policy for the past couple of decades.

In light of Romney's comments on Face the Nation, it would appear that his administration would be little more than a perpetuation of that neo-con foreign policy mentioned by Paul in his address. 

Demonstrating what many hope is a continuing fidelity to the Constitution despite his recent endorsement of Mitt Romney, Ron Paul’s son Senator Rand Paul (R-Ky.) mirrored his father’s sentiments in a speech he gave on the floor of the Senate:

Our Founding Fathers were quite concerned about giving the power to declare war to the Executive. They were quite concerned that the Executive could become like a king. Many in this body cannot get boots on ground fast enough in a variety of places, from Syria to Libya to Iran. We don't just send boots to war. We send our young Americans to war. Our young men and women, our soldiers, deserve thoughtful debate. Before sending our young men and women into combat, we should have a mature and thoughtful debate over the ramifications of and over the authorization of war and over the motives of the war. James Madison wrote that the Constitution supposes what history demonstrates. That the Executive is the branch most interested in war and most prone to it. The Constitution, therefore, with studied care vested that power in the Legislature.

 Concluding his remarks, Representative Paul said:

 It's time the United States tried a policy of diplomacy, seeking peace, trade, and friendship. We must abandon our military effort to promote and secure an American empire.

Besides, we're broke, we can't afford it, and worst of all, we're fulfilling the strategy laid out by Osama bin Laden. whose goal had always been to bog us down in the Middle East and bring on our bankruptcy here at home.

It's time to bring our troops home and establish a non-interventionist foreign policy, which is the only road to peace and prosperity.

The question is: Whom can the American people rely on to get us back on that straight and narrow road?


  • Comment Link Nancy Wednesday, 20 June 2012 20:45 posted by Nancy

    Blessings to Dr. Ron Paul for trying his best to get Congress and Americans to listen and pay attention. He is right on 99% of all the issues which is about 99% better than both the candidates we now have. I will vote for Dr. Ron Paul and continue talking with friends that I can reach about him and his beliefs. All my adult children and all their friends are supporters of Ron Paul, I am also and many of my senior friends.

    I really thought that Mitt Romney would be different for our country. Perhaps he will be economically. But if he chooses to continue the same path of every President, including Bush and Obama, then I cannot in good conscience vote for him. I had hoped he had the background, Faith, and family and education to be a new and different kind of Republican, but it appears he really isn't. I do not want another dictator for a President that chooses their ego and arrogance over our Constitution, Congress and Americans and do what they want and/or what the horrid UN and Nato want. Sorry that Romney seems to be just another man that will follow the same ole path as all priors.

    I and most all I personally know will still Vote for Dr. Ron Paul now and the more we learn, the more convicted we are in that decision.

  • Comment Link REMant Wednesday, 20 June 2012 20:21 posted by REMant

    "We cannot survive a course of action which would include a nuclear Iran. We must be willing to take any and all actions." ...and this from a man who, himself, ducked, military service in Vietnam.

  • Comment Link Bryan Prouty Wednesday, 20 June 2012 16:41 posted by Bryan Prouty

    It is time for the U.S. to finally learn its lesson. A just people cannot win an unjust war without becoming an unjust people. Fortunately we are not yet ready to become a completely unjust people. Thus, we will lose every unjust war. We will lose not by military might, but by the will to fight unjustly. Washington, and Jefferson clearly understood the Christian principles of just war. It is time for people with Christian convictions to stand up and say enough. Support Ron Paul in his efforts to restore just war and constitutional principles to U.S. foreign policy.

    The Constitution is the key to understanding Ron Paul's foreign policy. The Constitution expressly grants the power to declare war to Congress. The president is prohibited from initiating military action specifically to prohibit the kind of projection of power that has become standard practice for the United States. If we continue in the vein of Vietnam, the Gulf War, Bosnia, Iraq, Afghanistan, and Libya, - all illegal, undeclared, and unjust wars - we will fail as a nation. If the war is unjust, the United States will always bog down in an untenable, unwinnable conflict. A superior peace is a key component of a just war; only a just war allows the establishment of a superior peace and therefore a lasting peace.

Please Log In To Comment
Log in