According to a report released in May by Eric Jensen, a statistician/demographer with the Census Bureau’s Population Division, the national origin of immigrants entering the United States has been shifting since 2009, with immigrants from Asia now surpassing those from Mexico.
Despite the statements of the various Republican presidential candidates, the Constitution is clear on the issue of birthright citizenship.
On August 24, the government of Mexico filed an amicus curiae brief in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas (Austin Division) in support of a lawsuit filed against the Texas Department of State Health Services by a group of illegal aliens represented by several nonprofit civil rights organizations alleging that the state has violated the 14th Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause by rejecting their applications to obtain birth certificates for their U.S.-born children.
As the concept of birthright citizenship becomes a much-talked-about issue in the 2016 presidential campaign, media pundits have discussed several aspects of the practice, including its economic costs, which are impacted by the higher-than-average birthrates of the women involved.
Presidentail candidate Jeb Bush, with an eye towards not alienating Hispanic voters, said his use of the term “anchor baby” was meant to apply mostly to Asians who abuse the “noble concept.”