David Cortman of the Alliance Defense Fund (ADF), the conservative legal advocacy group that represented the women in court, declared that Christians should be allowed to express themselves on public school campuses, just like everyone else. It is cowardly to shut down everyones participation in this program simply to keep out Christian speech.
Cortman said that the district had approved the Buy a brick, inscribe a message fundraiser created by the Palm Desert High School Parent-Teacher Organization (see page seven of the districts PTO newsletter), with no limitation given other than the length of the inscriptions on the pavers.
According to the ADF, fundraiser guidelines stipulated that messages could pay tribute, honor a legacy, commemorate a special event, or recognize various entities. But school officials changed their minds when they saw the womens completed bricks, arguing that the Bible verses would have constituted an unconstitutional establishment of religion even though officials had okayed, among other messages, a Hindu-flavored quote from Mahatma Gandhi, as well as a Bible verse in Spanish.
When the PTOs Karen Rohrbaugh saw the womens Bible-themed bricks, she quickly e-mailed high school principal Patrick Walsh, alerting him to the religious verbiage, to which Walsh responded: We need to respectfully decline the donation of bricks quoting scripture from the bible. Im sure most parents will understand the constitutional protections regarding the separation of church and state.
While perhaps most parents would, Hart and Caronna didnt, prompting the district to scrap the fundraiser rather than find itself eating crow and begrudgingly including the womens commemoration of their faith in God.
There is absolutely nothing unconstitutional about a Bible verse on a brick when a school opens up a program for anyone to express a personal message, said Cortman. The school simply could have allowed the Bible verses, but instead they chose to punish everyone.