You are here: HomeWorld NewsAfricaSouth Africa Facing White Genocide, Total Communist Takeover
Saturday, 04 August 2012 14:00

South Africa Facing White Genocide, Total Communist Takeover

Written by 

While most of the world refuses to acknowledge what is happening in largely communist-controlled South Africa, the non-profit group Genocide Watch declared last month that preparations for genocidal atrocities against white South African farmers were underway and that the early phases of genocide had possibly already begun. In the long run, Genocide Watch chief Dr. Gregory Stanton explained, powerful communist forces also hope to abolish private-property ownership and crush all potential resistance.

According to experts and official figures, at least 3,000 white farmers in South Africa, known as Boers, have been brutally massacred over the last decade. Many more, including children and even infants, have also been raped or tortured so savagely that mere words could not possibly convey the horror. And the problem is growing worse, international human rights monitors and South African exiles say. 

The South African government, dominated by the communist-backed African National Congress (ANC), has responded to the surging wave of racist murders by denying the phenomenon, implausibly claiming that many of the attacks are simply regular crimes. Despite fierce criticism, authorities also stopped tracking statistics that would provide a more accurate picture of what is truly going on in the so-called “Rainbow Nation.”

In many cases, the murders are simply classified as “burglaries” and ignored, so the true murder figures are certainly much higher than officials admit. The police, meanwhile, are often involved in the murders or at least the cover-ups, multiple sources report. A white South African exile living in the United States told The New American that when victims are able to defend themselves or apprehend the would-be perpetrators, many of the perpetrators are found to be affiliated with the ruling ANC or its youth wing.  

Experts are not buying the government’s cover-up. "The farm murders, we have become convinced, are not accidental," said Dr. Stanton of Genocide Watch during a fact-finding mission to South Africa last month. It was very clear that the massacres were not common crimes, he added — especially because of the absolute barbarity used against the victims. "We don't know exactly who is planning them yet, but what we are calling for is an international investigation that will try and determine who is planning these murders."

Indeed, most honest analysts concede that the thousands of brutal killings and tens of thousands of attacks are part of a broader pattern. And according to Dr. Stanton, who was also involved in the anti-Apartheid movement in South Africa and has decades of experience examining genocide and communist terror, the trend points toward a troubled future for the nation.

“Things of this sort are what I have seen before in other genocides,” he said of the murdered white farmers, pointing to several examples including a victim’s body that was left with an open Bible on top and other murder victims who were tortured, disemboweled, raped, or worse. “This is what has happened in Burundi, it’s what happened in Rwanda. It has happened in many other places in the world.”  

Speaking in Pretoria at an event organized by the anti-communist Transvaal Agricultural Union, Dr. Stanton also slammed the effort to dehumanize whites in South Africa by portraying them as “settlers.” The label is meant to paint Afrikaner white farmers — descendants of Northern Europeans who arrived centuries ago — as people who do not belong there.

It is the same process that happened prior to the infamous genocide against Christian Armenians in Turkey, Stanton explained. The dehumanization phenomenon also occurred against the Jewish people in Germany under the National Socialist (Nazi) regime of mass-murderer Adolf Hitler, well before the Nazi tyrant began implementing his monstrous “final solution.”

Unfortunately, South Africa might be next in line, experts believe. "Whenever you have that kind of dehumanization ... you have the beginning of that downward spiral into genocide," Stanton noted, adding that the situation in South Africa had already moved beyond that stage. The next phase before extermination, which began years ago in South Africa, is organizing to actually carry it out.

"We are worried that there are organized groups that are in fact doing that planning," Stanton continued during his speech. "It became clear to us that the [ANC] Youth League was this kind of organization — it was planning this kind of genocidal massacre and also the forced displacement of whites from South Africa."

Genocide Watch raised its alert level for South Africa from stage five to stage six — the eighth and final stage is denial after the fact — when then-ANC Youth League boss Julius Malema began openly singing a racist song aimed at inciting murder against white South African farmers: "Shoot the Boer" and “Kill the Boer.” Described by the anti-genocide group as a “racist Marxist-Leninist,” Malema has also been quoted as saying that “all whites are criminals” and threatening to steal white farmers’ land by force.

After the calls to genocide made international headlines, the South African Supreme Court ruled that the song advocating murder of whites was unlawful hate speech. Incredibly, the President of South Africa, ANC’s Jacob Zuma, then began singing it early this year too. Since then, the number of murdered white South African farmers has been growing each month, according to reports. Other senior government officials, meanwhile, have openly called for “war.”

"This is the kind of talk that of course is not only pre-genocidal, it also comes before crimes against humanity," Dr. Stanton said, urging everyone to remember that they are all members of the human race. "Those who would be deniers, and who would try to ignore the warning signs in this country, I think are ignoring the facts."   

There is also increasing “polarization,” where the target population — white farmers in this case — and even moderates are portrayed as an “enemy,” Stanton explained about the march to genocide. And that phenomenon is ever-more apparent in South Africa, leading Genocide Watch to classify South Africa as being close to the final stages of genocide in July of this year. 

The issue of land distribution, which has become one of the key drivers of the downward spiral, is also among the greatest concerns. The white minority in South Africa still owns much of the land despite ANC promises to redistribute it to blacks. But the re-distribution that has occurred — like in neighboring Zimbabwe — has largely resulted in failure.

Despite the atrocious track record so far, extremists including elements of the ANC-dominated government are now hoping to expropriate land from white farmers more quickly, with some factions even arguing that it should be done with no compensation at all. And the communist agenda, like virtually everywhere else where forcible land redistribution has been adopted, has even broader goals.

“Whatever system of land tenure is adopted in South Africa, the communists — in the long run — have in mind to take away all private property. That should never be forgotten,” Stanton warned, noting that he had lived in communist-run countries before. "Every place you go where communists have taken over, they take away private ownership because private ownership gives people the power — the economic power — to oppose their government. Once you have taken that away, there is no basis on which you can have the economic power to oppose the government."

Meanwhile, the South African government is stepping up efforts to disarm the struggling white farmers, too — stripping them of their final line of defense. As has consistently been the case throughout history, of course, disarmament is always a necessary precursor to totalitarianism and the eventual mass slaughter of target groups. In fact, arms in the hands of citizens are often the final barrier to complete enslavement and even extermination.

“The government has disbanded the commando units of white farmers that once protected their farms, and has passed laws to confiscate the farmers’ weapons,” Genocide Watch noted on its website in an update about South Africa posted last month. “Disarmament of a targeted group is one of the surest early warning signs of future genocidal killings.”

The exile who spoke with TNA said that many of the guns confiscated from whites by officials have later been found at the gruesome murder scenes of white farmers. Even mere possession of an “unregistered” or “unlicensed” weapon — licenses have become extraordinarily difficult to obtain, if not impossible — can result in jail time. And in South Africa, especially for white farmers, that is a virtual death sentence, with widespread rape and HIV infections being the norm. 

Dr. Stanton promised the Afrikaners that he would be visiting the U.S. Embassy and bringing the issue to the attention of world leaders. However, he also urged them not to give up their guns and to continue resisting against the communist “ideology” espoused by so many of the political and party leaders that now dominate the nation’s coercive government apparatus. 

The United Nations defines genocide as "the deliberate and systematic destruction, in whole or in part, of an ethnic, racial, religious, or national group." The term also includes actions other than simply wholesale slaughter, though. According to the UN, among the crimes that can constitute genocide are causing serious harm to members of a specific minority group, deliberately inflicting conditions on the minority aimed at bringing about its destruction in whole or in part, seeking to prevent births among the targeted population, and forcibly transferring minority children to others.

Activists and exiles argue that many of those conditions have already been met — and any single one can technically constitute genocide if it is part of a systematic attempt to destroy a particular group. Meanwhile, experts say that the government is encouraging the problem, actively discriminating against whites, and in many cases even facilitating the on-going atrocities.

Of course, this would not be the first time a similar tragedy has happened in Southern Africa. When Marxist dictator Robert Mugabe seized power in Zimbabwe (formerly known as Rhodesia, once one of the richest countries on the continent), he began a ruthless war against the white population and his political opponents.

The country promptly spiraled into chaos and mass starvation under the Mugabe regime when the tyrant “redistributed” the farms and wealth to his cronies, who of course knew nothing about farming. The regime murdered tens of thousands of victims, and estimates suggest that millions have died as a direct result of Mugabe’s Marxist policies.

Whites who refused to leave their property during the “redistribution” were often tortured and killed by the regime or its death squads. With Mugabe still in charge, the tragic plight of Zimbabwe continues to worsen today. But the mass-murdering despot is still held in high regard by many senior officials in the ANC. 

Not all South Africans — especially city dwellers — are convinced that there is an on-going genocide in their country, or even that one may be coming. Indeed, the vast majority of blacks and whites would simply like to live in peace with each other, and there are plenty of other problems facing South Africa at the same time. However, virtually everyone agrees that without solutions, the precarious situation in the “Rainbow Nation” will continue to deteriorate, going from bad to worse.

Many activists seeking to draw attention to the issue are calling on European governments and the United States to immediately begin accepting especially vulnerable white refugees from South Africa as a high priority. There are less than five million whites in the country, about 10 percent of the population, down from almost a quarter decades ago. Analysts say that giving them asylum, however, may prove tough politically — partly because it could expose the precious establishment myths of Nelson Mandela and his ANC as being “heroic” so-called “freedom fighters.”

Unsurprisingly, the establishment press has barely reported a word about the looming potential calamity. And by the time the world media finally catch on, many analysts worry that it might be too late.

Related articles:

Is Genocide Coming to South Africa?

Ilana Mercer's "Into the Cannibal's Pot": A Review

"Invictus" Means Invincible, Like Hollywood Myths

New York Times Sees "Golden Lining" in Zimbabwe's Brutal Marxist Rule

Libyan Rebels Accused of "Ethnic Cleansing," Black Genocide

"Maafa 21" Exposes Black Genocide

15 comments

  • Comment Link John Bull Sunday, 28 October 2012 08:23 posted by John Bull

    @Red Ghost, Gordon Freeman and

    PART 1

    A good debate - although missing some essential details
    I was born the year the National Party came to power to a British immigrant father and a Boere meisie mother. Growing up in Natal my upbringing was essentially SA English. I knew no other political system until relocating to the UK at age 40.

    I lived through the whole international condemnation of SA by the anti-aparheid movements and closely followed the birth of “The Rainbow Nation” and the cannonization of Saint Mandela from the UK. Since living in the UK I have visited SA every second year and monitored the changes very closely.

    What my experiences have taught me is that apartheid was different things at different times to different people in different parts of the country.

    I commend Red Ghost for his outstanding response.
    Over the years the Boere / Afrikaners have been the subject of an intense media villification campaign originating in the UK / SA English, so called, liberal media. The popular message put out in SA was the Afrikaners were the evil racist oppressors and the SA English were the liberal moderate benefactors to SA blacks. Not so, the NP would never have been able to retain power with increasing majorities from the 1960s to the 1990s without the support of a growing English vote. Yes the Progressives did grow to a certain strength but they peaked and never expanded beyond it.

    Apartheid was NOT a Boer / Afrikaner creation. It began with the British forcibly taking the Cape and then codifying their class system into law. Prior to that segregation exiisted through the European Dutch East India Co officials, the free burghers and their slaves brought in from Dutch possessions in Indonesia. The Boer Republics only came into being in 1854 and 1856 whereas the British institutionalised segregation into law in the Cape post 1806 and Natal post 1843.
    The entire historical legislative trail up to the present has been meticulously detailed on:

    http://www.nelsonmandela.org/omalley/

    The period of segregation from 1806 to 1948 under Britain’s watch could be described as “Informal Apartheid” - i.e. the existing plethora of segregationist laws did not have a formal policy name. The National Party named the status quo they inherited as Apartheid - the German, Dutch, Flemish and Afrikaans word for segregation. The period 1948 to 1990 when Pres De Klerk formally abolished the policy can be described as “Formal Apartheid”. It is interesting to note that at any time between 1806 and 1961 when SA became a republic the British government was fully supportive of the staus quo although liberal movements within the UK were starting to speak out against it. Particularly between the establishment of the Union Parliament in 1910 and their departure in 1961 the British had the power to veto any act passed by the SA Parliament. Not once did they exercise it.

    While all this was taking place segregation was alive and well in the Jin Crow era in the USA and yet there was no international campaign by the west to end it. It is strange that only South Africa was singled out for condemnation whilst Australia practiced a whites only immigration policy and New Zealand fielded the Maori rugby team for which no white man could play.

    On coming to power in 1948 the Afrikaners set about re-establishing the republic they had lost to the British in the Anglo-Boer War of 1899-1902. It is important to note here that Afrikaners were the majority group by 60% to 40% within the white community. Add to that Afrikaans being the language of the now 7% Coloured [Mulatto] community and Afrikaners were quite justified in placing their mark on the republic they had contributed substantially towards creating. It is also worth remembering that the British changed the names of many of their towns in the Cape from Dutch to English and insisted in law that English be the only official language, despite it being in the minority.

    As Red Ghost correctly points out part of the new republic was the process of returning the traditional African lands back to the 9 black tribes. It was the British who had conquered these people, taken their lands from them and imposed colonial rule upon them. At various times these territories were known as Native Reserves, Bantustans and Homelands - no different to the Indian Reservations in Canada and the USA. This Homeland restoration policy was described as “A Crime Against Humanity” in a resolution passed by the UN. The 1910 British construct of The Union of South Africa had effectively created an African Yugoslavia - and look at what has become of that nation today.

  • Comment Link Coenraad Friday, 24 August 2012 09:32 posted by Coenraad

    I am so glad the truth about this "rainbow nation" is being heard by the world.The left winged ANC controled media in RSA is keeping the truth from the world.This country is displaying a false image to the world.Law and order has left at the back door and the white people still gets the blame for everything that goes wrong.We are in Zimbabwe's footsteps but with a white genocide on a much more orginaized and far bigger scale.The world seems to be ignorant to what is going on.This country is heading for a civil war-that is unavoidable!We have learned in this 18 years that we have to fight this battle on our own-and we will and we will survive and succeed!

  • Comment Link Red Ghost Sunday, 19 August 2012 01:26 posted by Red Ghost

    @quentin.
    "I think that at the end of the British rule once the Boere; as you called them; gained total independence their mind set had to have been never again and they started “verafrikanisering” everything, meaning white Afrikaans dominating all social aspects hence mostly Afrikaans were spoken in the workplace and in schools including black schools the naming of streets, businesses, schools hospitals, universities etc after white Afrikaans speaking(boere)the reason being that under British rule everything was done in English." I absolutely agree that they most certainly had the mindset that they would never again be ruled, assimilated or threatened by anyone - their response similar to the increase in screening and security in America post 9/11...Prevention by locking down is better than cure after all.

    "I mean I crew up hating the English although they were also white Africans (those that were born here) but we were told by our elders that they were responsible for the deaths of thousands of boere women and children in the concentration camps. Subsequently there was no room or tolerance for any other race or culture and in my view this is where it all started going south because of the British/English dominance and the over compensation by the Afrikaans speaking"

    EDITED FOR EXCESSIVE LENGTH

Login to post comments
Subscribe to The New American daily highlights