You are here: HomeWorld NewsEurope
Friday, 05 July 2013 17:00

NSA Surveillance Disclosures Recall Days of East German STASI

Written by 

When Wolfgang Schmidt learned about NSA leaker Edward Snowden’s revelations concerning the agency's ability to collect personal data on millions of American citizens, he was astonished. When he was a lieutenant colonel in East Germany’s secret police, the STASI, his department, was limited to tapping just 40 phones every day. If a decision was made to tap a new phone, one of the others had to be disconnected. Said Schmidt: “For us, this would have been a dream come true ... so much information on so many people!”

Before the fall of the Berlin Wall, the German Democratic Republic (GDR) employed more than 90,000 people, including 15,000 soldiers in the GDR army and 2,000 full-time collaborators. There were also 175,000 “unofficial” collaborators. One STASI official estimated the total to be closer to 500,000 people, or about five percent of the country’s population at the time.

They were assigned to all major industrial plants as well as schools, universities, and hospitals. Other informants worked as trolley conductors, janitors, doctors, nurses, and teachers — people who had frequent contact with citizens. At its peak the STASI had one informer for every six citizens.

When Malte Spitz, a member of Germany’s Green Party, sued his telephone company, Deutsche Telekom (DT) back in 2010, he learned that the new technology is vastly more intrusive than even the STASI in its heyday. The compact disc he received from DT as part of the settlement included more than 35,000 pieces of data that revealed

when Spitz walked down the street, when he took a train, when he was in an airplane. It shows where he was in the cities he visited. It shows when he worked and when he slept, when he could be reached by phone and when [he] was unavailable. It shows when he preferred to talk on his phone and when he preferred to send a text message. It shows which beer gardens he liked to visit in his free time. All in all, it reveals an entire life.

Stefan Wolle, the curator at Berlin’s East German Museum, was able to retrieve the STASI records of their surveillance of his activities and discovered, to his surprise, just how much of it was valueless and banal:

When the wall fell, I wanted to see what the STASI had on me, on the world I knew. A large part of what I found was nothing more that office gossip, the sort of thing people used to say around the water cooler about affairs and gripes, the sort of things that people today put in emails or texts to each other.

The lesson is that when a wide net is cast, almost all of what is caught is worthless.

And therein lies the problem facing the NSA today. As it collects and stores billions of e-mails and texts and phone calls, the amount of data is soaring into the trillions. The question becomes: Who is going to do the sorting, sifting and winnowing of that immensely large quantity of data? Where will these people come from? Who will train them? Who will pay for their education? How will they be able to sort through endless haystacks looking for an occasional needle?

The NSA is facing the “cotton gin” conundrum. With Eli Whitney’s invention of the cotton gin in 1793, the cost of producing cotton began slowly to fall. This made the value of each slave rise enormously over the next six decades. In 1790 there were approximately 700,000 slaves, but that number had nearly quintupled by 1860 to 3.2 million. From the website of the Eli Whitney Museum the impact of his invention on slavery is explained:

Whitney (who died in 1825) could not have foreseen the ways in which his invention would change society for the worse. The most significant of these was the growth of slavery. While it was true that the cotton gin reduced the labor of removing seeds, it did not reduce the need for slaves to grow and pick the cotton. In fact, the opposite occurred. Cotton growing became so profitable for the planters that it greatly increased their demand for both land and slave labor. In 1790 there were six slave states; in 1860 there were 15. From 1790 until Congress banned the importation of slaves from Africa in 1808, Southerners imported 80,000 Africans. By 1860 approximately one in three Southerners was a slave.

Here’s the conundrum: As the cost of gathering infinite data on large numbers of people falls essentially to zero, the cost of analyzing and acting on that data will rise dramatically. This will do to high-priced talent what it did to the price of slaves: It will drive it up. As professor Gary North noted in his members-only newsletter: “Computers cannot file lawsuits. They cannot assess the importance of information. They cannot compare raw data to statute law. They cannot evaluate the relevance of raw data for various scenarios.”

This is the bottleneck facing the NSA. It can (and will) collect all the data it wants. It can store it in its data banks in Bluffdale, UtahFort Meade, Maryland, and elsewhere. But the bottleneck remains. The “cotton gin” conundrum remains. Who is going to do the sorting? How many will it take? Where will the money come from?

 Photo of Berlin Wall: AP Images

A graduate of Cornell University and a former investment advisor, Bob is a regular contributor to The New American magazine and blogs frequently at www.LightFromTheRight.com, primarily on economics and politics. He can be reached at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

8 comments

  • Comment Link sirburban Sunday, 07 July 2013 11:36 posted by sirburban

    Dennis,
    The Venona project as you probably know was an intelligence gathering team effort between the US and Britain. Venona collected communication transmissions between Moscow and their agents in the US, Great Britain, Canada and the United States.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Venona_project

    Those were the days when NSA spied on enemies abroad and suspected enemies at home! The homegrown variety still had their rights in tact including all the protections under the Bill of Rights.

    No US citizen, however, has the right to work underground or aboveground for a foreign government whose goal is to conquer us. Harry Dexter White, Alger Hiss, and a whole brigade of other American spies were engaged in just that endeavor: spying for and working within our own government; setting policy that was favorable to the USSR.

    After WWII a young man came from the banking industry and was hired to be the "Director of Research" for a committee of Congress (Reece Committee) and was put to work investigating the mighty Tax Exempt Foundation in America. His task was to discover evidence for congress to see if these foundations were doing work or funding projects that could be labeled un-American activities!

    After being on staff on the Reece Committee, Dodd put it all together albeit in an inadvertent way. He went to Ford Foundation and was told by a Ford Foundation executive: that aiding communists abroad was part of the plan to merge our two nations together. Norman Dodd was told point blank that the huge store of tax exempt dollars gathered at Ford (and we assume other foundations) were to be used "so as to alter life in the US," for the purpose of merging our two countries together.

    The foundations were instrumental in moving American education away from principles embodied in the Declaration of Independence he told G.Edward Griffin in the video link. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m2xcwFpSW0k

    Dodd says the granting monies would be used to "orient" our educational system away from the Constitution.

    What the late Norman Dodd basically said was that the rich foundations would work towards popularizing in educational institutions unconstitutional thinking in order to make the process in congress of veering away from the Constitution easier to achieve due to the uneducated or "reoriented" masses having been sold a bill of goods in the pubic school classroom.

    Others like Robert Welch have said that the Constitution and the moral base Americans had stood upon for generations was an insurmountable impediment that blocked the way of the collectivists. That the breakdown of morality in America was vital for the collectivists to achieve. When we see that Rockefeller Foundation monies have poured into immoral outfits such as Planned Parenthood and helped fund eugenics societies we can see this process of subversion of the culture at work.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_eugenics

    Those who take time to study this can see that a return to the Constitution and a reenergized commitment to God and His principles will go a long way in stopping the collectivists' drive towards total government under the compassionless god of state force. http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/foreign-policy/item/1213-council-on-foreign-relations

  • Comment Link sirburban Sunday, 07 July 2013 09:49 posted by sirburban

    The second part of your question could be understood as being either anti-McCarthy or pro-McCarthy. I wrote my post assuming that your post was anti-Joe McCarthy. I apologize.

  • Comment Link Dennis Sunday, 07 July 2013 08:23 posted by Dennis

    Sirburbon, thank you for that great insight! I will follow that link. For quite some time now I have believed that McCarthy was on the right path.

    The new fabricated threat to America is "terrorism", or the war on terror. A resurgent Communism currently rivals that war on terror as the CFR's efforts reach a crescendo. We are so very near the pinnacle that every TRUE American must be prepared. Sacrifices will and must be made as we encroach on a time as profound in our history as the Civil War.

  • Comment Link sirburban Saturday, 06 July 2013 13:50 posted by sirburban

    Nora,
    McCarthy would have fought tooth and nail against this unconstitutional overreach by the federal government.

    McCarthy was a small government Republican whereas Eisenhower was a big government Republican- a neocon if you will.

    Ike issued an executive order ordering all federal agencies bosses not to cooperate with McCarthy's investigations into the communist penetration of the US government which was extensive. Some communists like Harry Dexter White set US foreign and domestic monetary policy. White was instrumental in helping Stalinists with Lend Lease aid. Other non-communists, but nonetheless, communist-friendly policy makers, set US policy that helped communist governments abroad. Castro came to power by these kooky red-friendly policy makers.

    The plan worked by the big government facilitators of communism was and is:
    build the monster (communism) via aid and trade deals, diplomacy and even direct foreign aid. The monster begins to frighten Americans and the US government begins to grow to face the danger from the US created monster!

    The FBI and that entire panoply of spying bureaucracy would never had occurred had there not been communist Russia and communist China. NATO would not have been created nor any of the other "mutual defense" pacts to deal with communism. All of these treaties formed to deal with the threat of communism serve to build the central government. Ask yourself why NATO had not been dismantled now that communism is supposed to be "dead?" NATO was never an anti-communist organization. One of the purposes was to circumvent the US congress.

    When communism's role ran its effective course the "Insiders" gave it a Mark Twain type "exaggerated" demise. The CFR-controlled press' obit pages gave communism a first class send off into protective custody!

    The biggest threat to freedom, Nora, comes not from abroad but from the policy makers (Council on Foreign Relations) who are growing the federal government monster. James Perloff explains how this process works in his book Shadows of Power. https://www.jbs.org/shop-jbs/catalog/product/view/id/4382/s/shadows-of-power/category/48/

  • Comment Link Nora Saturday, 06 July 2013 00:03 posted by Nora

    History is indeed repeating itself. Where is our new McCarthy?

Log in
Sign up for The New American daily highlights