Friday, 21 March 2014 09:45

Polls: Americans Repeatedly Say "No!" to U.S. Intervention in Ukraine

Written by 

In polls taken over the past few weeks by a number of opinion survey and news organizations, the American people have sent a remarkably unified message to President Obama and the U.S. Congress: “Stay out of Ukraine!”

Despite being peppered with a constant onslaught of dramatic news video footage from Kiev and the Crimea, as well as a visit to the Obama White House by Ukrainian Prime Minister Arseny Yatseniuk, and the usual stable of policy “experts” from the Brookings Institution and the Council on Foreign Relations advocating more “robust” U.S. intervention, Americans across the political spectrum remain opposed to still another foreign venture.

A Pew Research Center poll reported on March 11 that in a national survey of over 1,000 adults, Americans, by a nearly two-to-one margin (56 percent vs. 29 percent), say it is more important for the United States to “not get too involved” in the situation with Russia and Ukraine than to “take a firm stand against Russian actions.” The breakdown along party lines, for those expressing opposition to greater involvement was Republicans, 50 percent; Democrats, 55 percent; Independents, 62 percent.

Even the 29 percent of respondents that favored a “firm stand against Russia’s actions” did not, apparently, include a military option in that stance. Only 16 percent of Republicans, five percent of Democrats, and five percent of Independents said the United States should consider military options against Russia. The breakdown of those who said we should “only consider economic/political options” was Republicans, 19 percent; Democrats, 24 percent; Independents, 18 percent. The terms “not get too involved,” “firm stand,” “military option,” and “economic/political options” are rather non-specific and leave much room for interpretation, but the overall sense, nonetheless, is that Americans are not in the least enthusiastic about having the White House wade into the turmoil in Ukraine.

A Washington Post-ABC News poll reported on March 11, “A solid 56 percent supports a coordinated effort of U.S. and European sanctions against Russia, which continues to strengthen its grip over the Crimean peninsula.” However, much of that support appears to be tepid, with the number of those actually “strongly” supporting sanctions dropping to 28 percent. According to the poll report, “Nearly as many strongly support sanctions (28 percent) as oppose them altogether (31 percent).”

Most recently, a Rasmussen Reports poll reported on March 18 that 52 percent of Americans support diplomatic action against Russia over its actions in Crimea. Again, something as vague as “diplomatic action” can mean a lot of things to different people. The wording chosen for polling questions is, of course, very important, and the types of questions asked can be used to shape an opinion poll to achieve desired objectives. A recent experiment by the British-based YouGov polling company demonstrated how the Ukraine issue could be gamed with the loaded questions.

“In the [YouGov] poll,” reported the Washington Post, “respondents were asked whether they thought the U.S. should get involved in Ukraine and what types of involvement were appropriate — sanctions, economic aid, diplomacy, military intervention, and so on.  But the poll also involved an experiment.”  Half of respondents were asked about Ukraine only after they answered these two questions: 

• Do you think Vladimir Putin’s actions in Crimea today are similar to what Hitler did in Austria and Czechoslovakia in 1938?

• Would you consider it "appeasement" for the U.S. and other western democracies not to take strong action to defend Ukraine? 

Douglas Rivers, a professor of political science at Stanford University and chief scientist at YouGov, explained the results of the experiment.

“Does context make a difference?” Rivers asked, and then answered: “Well, yes it seems to. Only 21% of those asked in the conventional way favored U.S. involvement in the Ukraine. When this question was preceded by the questions about appeasement and comparing Putin to Hitler, support for U.S. involvement rose to 29%. It didn't change the overall result — a majority of Americans still oppose getting involved in the Ukraine even after the parallel to 1938 is mentioned — but it does make a difference of about 8%.”

Professor Rivers further noted: 

It's also interesting to see how the comparison with Hitler raises (or doesn't raise) support for some specific actions. It does not, for example, appear to have much impact on support for military intervention. Even after mentioning Hitler, only 7% favored sending troops (compared to 5% in the normal poll) and 13% favored providing weapons (compared to 10% without the cue). The suggestion of appeasement did appear to raise support for economic sanctions and financial aid (by 7% and 8%, respectively) and slightly dampen support for negotiations. 

Related articles:

Putin Annexes Crimea; Ukraine Denounces Move as “Robbery”

George Soros’ Giant Globalist Footprint in Ukraine’s Turmoil

Ukraine Behind the Headlines: Disinformation, Manipulation, Propaganda

Ukraine: New Interim Government; Too Many Familiar Faces



  • Comment Link Todd Monday, 24 March 2014 00:02 posted by Todd

    And why should I be against Putin, when I hear of things like what the US Air Force did to a Christian cadet recently ? How many other things has our government done to marginalized us ? Can you make a short list on one page ? Here in America, you have the right to be politically correct, and the freedom to not offend another, or to become target for any legal predator who chooses to become offended. It has become the land of unfreedom. And, you want me to be patriotic ? To what ? I am no longer. I have lost all faith, hope and love for this land. Putin called us hypocrites - and he’s right. So, why should I be against him ? Did he do something worse to me and my Christian faith than my own country has done ? Putin was the only government leader I ever heard to acknowledge that my Christian brethren in other countries were being persecuted - the only one - And, all the while, the leaders in my country were calling me a potential terrorist because if it, when I did nothing to them. NOTHING ! I paid my taxes faithfully - I committed no crime at all. And for thanks, they deprive my kind of their rights to speak, even military leaders - graciously granting to the self-serving indignations of my enemies, full authority over my rights - to alienate what I was told was unalienable. Why should I fight for a land that works so hard to vilify me ?

    I have no way to tell if Putin was being honest, or just paying lip-service. I have no way to vouch for his sincerity, or character. You call him a ‘thug’, but, I do not see worse than what I see here. I would thus, sooner work for him, than I would work for this one, or these people. I am here, only because I have not the ability to leave. We cannot secure our rights, when our leaders hedge themselves into power, and the sense of the law in favor of our adversaries, and are even themselves, our adversary. I do not think America can be redeemed. Sorry to say, but the last straw has been borne unto me.

  • Comment Link Michael Dalene Saturday, 22 March 2014 02:12 posted by Michael Dalene

    To be perfectly Honest: Had I been ruling Russia during the Cuban Missile Crisis either there'd be nukes in Cuba or the US and/or Planet would be glowing... I don't think the US has the balls to pick on somebody/thing that can/will pick back!

    If Russia was some 4th world nation without any notable military might like Iraq we'd had likely invaded already... If the US decides to Push a nation capable of shooting back I hope the not only shoot back but give this nation's military one-hellava Black Eye!

    I'd be really interested in just how our Multi-Trillion dollar military machine fares against a near competitor. Considering our TRILLION DOLLAR MISSILE DEFENSE SYSTEM can't track a commercial aircraft makes me seriously question our ability to track- much less destroy, a missile fired at us from any point on the globe; unless of course the missile is flying high enough and/or has an active transponder...

    I sometimes/often think the technical hype they feed US is more BS than fact! More "the instilling of fear" than the reality of fact! If you're incapable of doing jackshit you don't want your enemy knowing it!

    What better deception than a "leak" of super-computers and super-surveillance "warning" us of systems that in reality--- DO NOT EXIST! The fear itself would work wonders!!!

Please Log In To Comment
Log in