You are here: HomeWorld NewsUN Conference Fails to Agree to Arms Trade Treaty (ATT)
Monday, 30 July 2012 05:00

UN Conference Fails to Agree to Arms Trade Treaty (ATT)

Written by 

The month-long United Nations conference to draw up a global Arms Trade Treaty (ATT) failed to achieve consensus after the United States, Russia, and China requested more time to consider a draft treaty, according to the United Nations. The draft treaty, which would have required national gun registration, required unanimity among the nations assembled in order to advance.

“I am disappointed that the Conference on the Arms Trade Treaty (ATT) concluded its four-week-long session without agreement on a treaty text that would have set common standards to regulate the international trade in conventional arms,” UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon said. Ban termed the lack of agreement a “setback.” Ban said that the UN's commitment to signing “a robust ATT is steadfast” and that the global body would continue to work toward what he termed “a noble goal.”

Proponents of the global gun control measure argued that the ATT draft treaty would not have impacted private firearms ownership in the United States under the Second Amendment, as the treaty was nominally directed to international transfer of firearms. Of course, assurances that gun ownership will not be impacted by the UN treaty fell on deaf ears to the National Rifle Association and other supporters of the Second Amendment. While draft versions of the ATT did not explicitly call for the ban on privately held firearms, they did call for national gun registration and vague “control” measures that could be implied to include gun collection. From an administration that recently argued in court that not purchasing health insurance constituted interstate “commerce” that Congress can regulate under the Constitution, gun owners were not about to give the federal government a loophole that allowed for confiscation of firearms — even an improbable loophole.

Moreover, UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon sold the idea of a gun treaty to enhance the prestige and power of the United Nations. “A strong treaty would rid the world of the appalling human cost of the poorly regulated international arms trade,” the Secretary-General said. “It would also enhance the ability of the United Nations to cope with the proliferation of arms.”

The Obama administration had reversed a U.S. vote at the UN in 2006 (under the Bush administration) against an ATT on condition that the ATT be unanimously adopted. The Obama administration's ambassador even delivered a July 12 speech at the convention in support of the agreement, but after the draft treaty was released, the Obama administration asked for more time to consider the treaty, effectively killing the agreement.

Anti-gun organizations were crestfallen, and blamed the Obama administration for caving to domestic political pressure as the reason for the ATT conference failure. Scott Stedjan, senior policy advisor at Oxfam America said:

Today the United States did not grab the golden ring: an international arms treaty that would have bolstered our country's reputation as a leader on human rights. The White House's failure of courage to press this treaty to conclusion today and is a loss for hundreds of thousands of innocent civilians that die each year from armed violence fueled by the unregulated transfer of arms. Moving forward President Obama must show the political courage required to make a strong treaty that contains strong rules on human rights a reality. It was this courage that was missing from this week.

5 comments

  • Comment Link Tim Johnston Wednesday, 01 August 2012 15:25 posted by Tim Johnston

    Since the election of Obama we have far bigger issues to deal with outside the UN. Our next election is shaping up to be as big of a sham as the last. Do you know why Sarah Palin's bus tour was really canceled last year? Do you know why she stayed 30 miles away from the second debate and chose the death of Steve Jobs to announce that she's not running? Know what leaked out? Sarah Palin isn't in this race and won't be at the RNC because too many people now know the truth.

    Search PalinsDirtyLittleSecret for the BIGGEST cover up in world history before it disappears forever.

  • Comment Link Max Wednesday, 01 August 2012 15:09 posted by Max

    Some well meaning people will express disbelief that the American government would allow its Constitution to be subjugated by the UN...it is remarkable how little some of us in America really consider just what has been thus far done to the rule of law in the country - using as they have the threat of "terrorism" and the constant drum beat of fear as the vehicle for its ruin. As Mark Twain aptly summed up in one of his quotes:
    “Next the statesmen will invent cheap lies, putting the blame upon the nation that is attacked, and every man will be glad of those conscience-soothing falsities, and will diligently study them, and refuse to examine any refutations of them; and thus he will by and by convince himself that the war is just, and will thank God for the better sleep he enjoys after this process of grotesque self-deception”
    If we continue to blindly accept and fail to look very critically at what the elected are really saying and doing, we will indeed have as a result the loss of 2nd Amendment in its remaining form. The country will not sleep well should that day come to pass. It isn't liberal vs conservative, republican vs democrat, folks, it is a fact we collectively stand silently while well under way the destruction of the rule of law quickens.

  • Comment Link Lee Ringo Wednesday, 01 August 2012 14:47 posted by Lee Ringo

    Subjecting the rights guaranteed under the Constitution to a UN treaty directly violates the Constitution. Further it would lead to civil war, automatically. Many states have formal agreements on becoming a state. Violation of the Constitution would usually violate those agreements. In some cases, like Wyoming, the agreement is automatically revoked. Wyoming would automatically secede from the Union. Likely much of the central United States would follow as well. I suspect Obama will destroy this country one way or another.

  • Comment Link Lee Ringo Wednesday, 01 August 2012 14:42 posted by Lee Ringo

    Politicians have long been known to do anything to get push their agenda. It is widely acknowledged that hundreds of thousands died in Iraq after lies lead to war. Same is true with the gun ban nuts:
    - Gun Ban Bloomberg's former head of NYC police Intelligence is Dan Oates.
    - The same Dan Oates is chief of police for little Aurora Colorado.
    - Chief Oates has a perfect gun ban shooting in his town. His town out of all the towns in the country.
    - The shooting happens just before voting on ratification of a UN gun ban treaty.

  • Comment Link Sam Adams Wednesday, 01 August 2012 13:47 posted by Sam Adams

    I am just shocked that this Obama Administration would even entertain the idea of turning anything having to do with our US Constitiution over to the most radical collection of human rights violators in the World at the UN.You are talking about Nations like Uganda, Zimbabwe, even Iran and other terrorist Nations have been included in the negotiations on this so-called small arms Treaty, it is ridiculous to think that even if passed, how the UN would enforce such rules on US Citizens. I look at the UN and laugh at their impotence. The only problem with this concept is the notion of "farming out" parts, or amendments to the US Constitiution that politicians don't like to deal with. This is a tactic on the part of the Obama Administration and most Democrats wishing and hoping for strict gun control and yet, they know it's the kiss of death to support such an idea in the United States right now, politically it certainly is.

    It is amazing to me that Obama would even consider this idea and turning over a very important part of our Constitiutional liberty to these maniacs in the UN. All he's looking for is political cover and the UN gives that cover to Demcrats, Bill Clinton did the same thing in some of his dealings on foreign policy matters during his first term too, they are political cowards to be sure, especially on issues such as firearms ownership and where freedom is concerned. God, let's get this guy out of office ASAP.

Log in
Sign up for The New American daily highlights