While Obama was busy coddling the brutal communist dictatorship enslaving Cuba, Latin Americans from Ecuador and Brazil to Venezuela, Cuba, and beyond were busy trying to throw off the chains being imposed on them by their governments. In Ecuador, massive protests against the regime of socialist strongman Rafael Correa exploded into violence amid a nationwide uprising against Correa's bid to stay in power indefinitely and make himself a “dictator.” Brazilians in more than 200 cities gathered by the tens and hundreds of thousands to demand the impeachment of Marxist-Leninist President Dilma Rousseff's regime, which barely held on to power amid an avalanche of scandals and what multiple analysts said was a rigged election. And this may be just the start.
As Venezuela’s economy implodes amid skyrocketing inflation and crippling shortages of practically everything, Socialist strongman Nicolás Maduro has a new plan to prop up his imploding regime: annex two thirds of neighboring Guyana’s territory and almost one third of its population.
Protests in dozens of cities bring out more than 1.5 million Brazilians to call for President Rousseff’s ouster in response to corruption, inflation, and recession.
In an effort to control the chaos created by food shortages caused by inflation and price controls, Venezuela's government sent the military to occupy grocery stores.
The UN climate conference in Lima, Peru, is on track to have the largest carbon footprint of any UN climate conference to date.
After “former” communist-guerrilla leader Dilma Rousseff narrowly secured reelection in Brazil last week with an alleged 51 percent of the vote, Obama promptly picked up the phone to congratulate her. According to the White House, Obama promised an even stronger “bilateral relationship” with the deeply controversial regime — packed with self-declared communists — that the U.S. government knows full well is at the center of the ongoing socialist takeover of Latin America. At the same time, a petition on Obama’s “We The People” page was asking Obama to position himself “against the Bolivarian communist expansion in Brazil promoted by the administration of Dilma Rousseff.” Despite surpassing the necessary 100,000-signature threshold required for the White House to issue a response, Obama has ignored it so far.
Depois que a “ex”-comunista-líder guerrilheira Dilma Rousseff garantiu a reeleição do Brasil por um fio de cabelo na última semana, com supostos 51 por cento dos votos, Obama prontamente pegou o telefone para lhe dar os parabéns. Segundo a Casa Branca, Obama prometeu “relações bilaterais” ainda mais fortes com tão controverso regime — lotado de comunistas assumidos — que o governo dos EUA sabe muito bem que está no centro da tomada de poder pelos socialistas na América Latina.
If Brazil’s latest presidential election offers any indication, the quiet but ongoing socialist conquest of Latin America is likely to continue gathering steam. Former communist terrorist and current President Dilma Rousseff looked set for a tough battle over the weekend, with polls just weeks before the vote showing Socialist Party candidate Marina Silva ahead. Instead, Rousseff, who makes no secret of her ongoing affinity for brutal Marxism-Leninism, will face off against the more market-friendly contender Aecio Neves in a run-off election. No candidate secured the required 50 percent to win outright in the first round.
Russian strongman Vladimir Putin and Communist Chinese dictator Xi Jinping visited Latin America this month to push a new international order and boost relations between their regimes and the region’s totalitarian-minded rulers, signing huge deals with their counterparts in the Western Hemisphere on everything from trade and economic cooperation to military issues and espionage. According to analysts, the official Sino-Russo trips to the region highlight the fast-shifting geopolitical scene, with the world being shepherded in controlled fashion toward a new, “multi-polar” world order featuring a neutered United States and more unaccountable “global governance.”