Thursday, 25 January 2018

California Burning: Global Warming or Federal Mismanagement?

Written by 

“You never want a serious crisis to go to waste,” former Obama chief of staff and current Chicago mayor Rahm Emanuel once famously said. In other words, when something horrific happens, make sure to use it to further your own political agenda. The recent California wildfires are one such crisis that climate alarmists have pounced upon in order to moan about the hypothetical menace of anthropogenic global warming. Unfortunately for the doomsayers, science and facts simply do not line up with their claims.

California Governor Jerry Brown has been very vocal in blaming the intensity of California’s recent wildfires on anthropogenic (man-made) global warming. Brown has called the extremely large fires of this year “a new normal.” The governor didn’t mince words when he claimed, “With climate change, some scientists are saying Southern California is literally burning up.”

And Governor Brown is not alone. Columbia University climate scientist A. Park Williams said of the 2017 California wildfires, “This is looking like the type of year that might occur more often in the future.” UCLA climate scientist Daniel Swain says, “There’s a clear climate signal in these fires because of the drought conditions connected to climate change.” Even former President Barack Obama linked more severe wildfires to climate change in a 2014 interview with NBC’s Al Roker: “This is a problem that is affecting Americans right now. Whether it means increased flooding, greater vulnerability to drought, more severe wildfires — all these things are having an impact on Americans as we speak.”

But despite those pronouncements, the actual science on whether or not man-made global warming is intensifying wildfires in California and elsewhere is far from settled. In fact, those claims are in a great deal of doubt.

In Wales, a 2016 study by Swansea University professors Stefan H. Doerr and Cristina Santin, published by the U.K.’s Royal Society, concluded that “the widely held perception of increasing fire and fire impacts at the global and some regional scales is not well supported by the realities that the available data show.” The authors further deduced that “there is less overall fire in the landscape today than there has been centuries ago.”

In 2013, Dr. Bjørn Lomborg of the Copenhagen Consensus Center declared, “Historical analysis of wildfires around the world shows that since 1950 their numbers have decreased globally by 15%.”  Lomborg also tweeted in October of this year, “Forest fires in California and elsewhere devastating. But nowhere near record. About 1/5 of US Wildfire record.”

Back in America, Dr. David B. South, professor of forestry and wildlife sciences at Auburn University, recently told the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, “To attribute this human caused increase in fire risk to carbon dioxide emissions is simply unscientific.” The federal government’s own data show that the number and scale of wildfires has decreased dramatically since the 1930s. Wildfires in the United States destroyed more than 50 million acres in 1930. In 2017, approximately nine million acres have been destroyed.

“These data suggest that extremely large mega-fires were four times more common before 1940,” South said. “We cannot reasonably say that anthropogenic global warming causes extremely large wildfires.”

But there’s no doubt that, in recent years, the wildfires in California and other Western states have become more intense and more destructive. Why is that? There are many factors, both natural and man-made, that have contributed to the intensity of the wildfires in California.

Mother Nature’s Role

California’s climate always has been and always will be ripe for wildfires. Most of the state has what is known as a Mediterranean Climate. Wet winters become dry summers as the jet stream moves north. This has always been so. Areas in California at risk for wildfires will almost always be dry by the end of summer when wildfire season begins because summer months are always dry.

All fires require fuel and an ignition source. The Santa Ana and Diablo winds that California experiences increase both of these things. The Santa Anas, in particular, are extremely dry and hot downslope winds that occur yearly in California, most typically in the autumn. The Santa Anas usually peak in September or October. The winds first dry out the vegetation, which creates kindling for the infernos. The heavy gusts, sometimes up to 80 mph, then blow trees and power lines down, creating the sparks needed for ignition.

Another natural factor is that the Pacific Ocean is currently in a weak La Niña phase. This phenomenon, as opposed to its sibling phase El Niño, creates a generally cooler environment in the Pacific. La Niña seems to be caused by a build-up of cooler-than-normal waters in the Pacific Ocean between the Tropics of Cancer and Capricorn — not global warming. Upwelling brings this cooler water to the surface, which drops the temperature of the surface water, thus affecting the climate.

La Niña disrupts weather patterns and makes it difficult for late autumn storms to make landfall in California. The entire southern tier of America typically sees far less precipitation during times of La Niña. It is speculated that a long period of La Niña caused the dust-bowl conditions in 1930s America. Precipitation, stalled by La Niña, could have stopped the large Southern California fires far more quickly.

Referencing the Thomas Fire in Ventura County, Governor Brown claimed, “The fires are changing.… The way this fire performed, it’s not the way it usually has been. Going in lots of directions, moving fast, even without the hot winds.”

The phenomenon the governor is referencing — with the fire moving in different directions and seemingly creating its own winds — is commonly known as the Peshtigo Paradigm, so named for an 1871 wildfire in Northern Wisconsin that killed over 1,200 people. The Allied militaries studied the effects of the Peshtigo Fire in order to recreate them over Dresden and Tokyo in World War II. The paradigm posits that any large fire with a large supply of fuel will basically create its own wind conditions. So the California fires are not acting differently at all. Fire is simply acting the way it always acts.

There is even data that suggests that a warmer, drier climate — such as the climate that climate alarmists predict — would actually lessen the intensity of the California wildfires. Take the 2017 season for example. The previous winter was very wet in California. That extra moisture meant that a bumper crop of grass and other vegetation grew during the year. The natural, yearly drying of these grasslands created a great deal more kindling-like fuel, which contributed to the severity of the 2017 fires.

Mankind’s Role

Mankind definitely does have a hand in the increase in severity of the California fires. It is not, however, due to anthropogenic global warming. Much of the blame lies in man’s attempts to meddle with the environment through poorly thought-out laws and policy decisions. Government — the same government that wants you to believe that only it can solve the problem — is actually the cause of much of it.

In a May 2017 congressional hearing on wildfire suppression, U.S. Representative Tom McClintock (R-Calif.) put it like this: “Forty-five years ago, we began imposing laws that have made the management of our forests all but impossible.” McClintock has also stated, “Time and again, we see vivid boundaries between the young, healthy, growing forests managed by state, local and private landholders, and the choked, dying or burned federal forests.” A quick look on Google Maps confirms the congressman’s claim. The satellite images of California’s national forests are startling, showing crowded, brown and dry vegetation. Often a river or a highway separates the poorly managed federal lands from forests that are privately owned or managed by the state or a county. It’s amazing how climate change knows those exact boundaries.


This article appears in the February 5, 2018, issue of The New American. To download the issue and continue reading this story, or to subscribe, click here.

McClintock further stated, “The laws of the past forty-five years have not only failed to protect the forest environment — they have done immeasurable harm to our forests.”

That harm may indeed be immeasurable, but certain aspects of it can be measured. The U.S. Forest Service estimates that 102 million trees have died in California forests since 2010. Climate alarmists point to this as more proof of global warming. But the tree die-off is more about overcrowding than anything else. In the Sierra Nevada, the land can comfortably support 20-100 trees per acre. Because of the EPA’s abuse of private landowners regarding tree removal, the current density is 266 trees per acre. That type of overcrowding stresses trees to a point where they become easy prey to disease, pestilence, drought, and, of course, wildfires.

The laws that McClintock is specifically referencing are the National Environmental Policy Act, enacted in 1970, and the Endangered Species Act of 1973. Both of these laws, as well as dozens of other laws passed in their wake, have made common-sense, scientific management of federal forests extremely difficult.

For instance, a large component of common-sense forest management used to be timber sales. Private timber concerns would pay the federal government for the right to come in and responsibly harvest old-growth trees and remove them. The sales still exist, but the bureaucracy and red-tape involved in harvesting trees from federal lands owing to environmental extremism is cost-prohibitive to the timber companies. As a result of federal laws, not only are the federal forests dying from overcrowding and the resulting fires, but the timber business is also being killed off in the process. In 1981, California boasted 149 sawmills. Today, only 27 remain.

The Endangered Species Act (ESA) was set to expire in 1992 but has been kept alive by Congress, which each year approves funding that keeps the program alive. The program perpetually prohibits property owners from making changes to their own property, ostensibly to protect rodent, bird, and reptile habitats.

From 1993 until 2003, property owners in Riverside County were prohibited from removing brush from their properties because it had become a habitat for the kangaroo rat. A wildfire in 2003 blazed in Riverside County, killing 27 people and destroying 2,700 houses. Much of that fire was fueled by the brush that property owners were forbidden to remove. The rat habitat was destroyed as well.

Early in the last century, conservationists called for a total suppression policy in response to large outbreaks of wildfires in 1905 and 1910. At that time, the U.S. Forest Service was designated as the federal agency tasked with the elimination of these fires. After more than a hundred years, the Forest Service is still the agency assigned this task. In 2016, approximately 55 percent of the agency’s budget went to firefighting. The firefighting budget is typically taken from other Forest Service programs, most notably forest-management programs.

Total fire suppression allows dead and dying trees and other decaying plant matter to gather in forests instead of being burned up periodically. This creates more and drier fuel, worsening conditions and making at-risk areas even more ripe for larger and more severe fires.

And it’s not just federal policy that exacerbates these fires. State, county, and local lawmakers bear partial responsibility for the horrific 2017 fire season. Mismanagement and a lack of forethought regarding community development are major reasons that the California wildfires have been so catastrophic recently.

There have been a large number of houses built in areas that are very susceptible to wildfires. This is a direct result of irresponsible community planning. Areas in California’s wildland urban interface (WUI) have grown more than 300 percent in just the last 50 years. A WUI is an area where housing and vegetation are extremely close together. This poor planning places thousands in areas at high risk for wildfires.

Local governments and counties also bear responsibility for a lack of proper planning and maintenance of electrical facilities such as power lines in these areas. Above-ground electrical wires are very susceptible to arcing, especially in high gusts generated by the Santa Ana and Diablo winds. Such poor planning provides yet another source of ignition for fires.

However, there is some good news to report on the Thomas Fire which ignited in Ventura County on December 4. The fire, which has now been classified as the largest wildfire in California’s history and has destroyed more than 281,000 acres, was 100-percent contained as of January 12, according to the U.S. Forest Service.

Wildfires can have many sources, but man’s maliciousness and carelessness are the top causes. Whether it’s homeless people building fires in an attempt to stay warm at night, arson, or just a downed powerline in a fire-prone area, the majority of these fires can be traced back to some human activity.

Wildfires are naturally occurring phenomena that have existed ever since vegetation first appeared on the Earth. Scientists, conservationists, and anyone else concerned with wildfires recognize them as a necessary part of the ecosystem. Certain ecosystems — such as California’s Chaparral — actually rely on wildfires to clear out detritus that accumulates over the years.

So, it’s complicated. There are many factors both natural and man-made that are driving the intensity of California’s wildfires. Blaming the fires on anthropogenic global warming is not only inaccurate and lazy, it is politically motivated in the worst sense. Climate alarmists simply cannot help themselves. The dramatic footage of flames licking hundreds of feet into the air and the valiant, soot-stained firefighters is just too good a photo-op to pass up. Much like polar bears seemingly trapped on ice floes or large chunks of glaciers falling into the ocean, the horrific images of these fires are a tool that is used by the climate alarmists to further their agenda.

Climate-change activists wish for you to believe that a rise in carbon dioxide levels, caused by man, has already changed California’s climate to an extent that the fire season has not only been extended, but worsened. But science and facts simply do not line up with their assertions.

It’s almost as if Governor Brown and the rest of the climate alarmists want more and bigger fires, if only to prove a point.

Please review our Comment Policy before posting a comment

Whatfinger Featured Videos:

Affiliates and Friends

Social Media