President Trump's judicial legacy is already beginning to be realized.
First Amendment Prohibits Trump From Blocking Twitter Critics, Appeals Court Rules
Written by Michael Tennant
President Donald Trump cannot block critics from his Twitter account without violating the First Amendment’s guarantee of freedom of speech, a federal appeals court ruled Tuesday.
Perhaps in an effort to show that the entire Golden State has not jumped off the leftist cliff, a small desert city on the Arizona border has declared itself a “2nd Amendment Sanctuary City.”
Trump Disputes Reports That He Has Given Up Adding Citizenship Question to Census
Written by Warren Mass
President Trump tweeted that news reports about the Department of Commerce dropping its quest to put the Citizenship Question on the Census are “incorrect” or “FAKE!”
As John Randolph of Roanoke, a 19th-century member of Congress from Virginia (and a cousin of Thomas Jefferson), said, the constitutional protections of our liberties are just words on parchment, if the American people do not continue to stand up for these rights.
More...
Just when you thought it was safe to start sending texts and emails without worrying about the NSA listening in, seems the surveillance state is still up to its old tricks.
It's laudable that Judicial Watch is stepping up to prevent Electoral College abolishers from having their way with the American Republic.
Justice Thomas Opinion Decries “Erroneous Precedent,” Hints at Overturn of Roe v. Wade
Written by Raven Clabough
Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas may have confirmed the worst fears of pro-abortion advocates by decrying “erroneous precedent” on Monday.
While in U.K., President Trump Says He's "Thinking About" Banning Suppressors
Written by Joe Wolverton, II, J.D.
In an appearance on a U.K. talk show, President Trump said he's thinking about banning suppressors the way he banned bump stocks.
Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas recently dismissed rumors that he will soon retire, saying: “I have no idea where this stuff comes from.”
This ruling doesn't settle the issue reallocating monies to build a border wall, but illustrates how "originalist" thinking is informing judicial decisions.