A Gallup Governance poll conducted from September 9-13 found that 49 percent of Americans believe the federal government poses “an immediate threat to the rights and freedoms of ordinary citizens.”
The court's decision in Heller III only slightly improved D.C. residents' ability to apply the Second Amendment and use guns to defend themselves from criminal elements.
Prepare to be “nudged” by Obama's new “behavioral science” squads — for your own good, of course. Under the guise of better “serving” the American people through government, Obama signed an executive order this week calling for federal agencies and departments to deploy emerging “behavioral science” techniques against the public.
Among other goals, the expansion of federal mind manipulation is supposed to help more Americans access government welfare programs, take their “recommended” vaccines, supply more information about themselves to the federal government, and accelerate the transition toward what Obama called “a low-carbon economy.” The controversial decree, signed on September 15, explicitly seeks to use “behavioral science” to prod Americans — or “nudge” them, as Obama's “regulatory czar” Cass Sunstein put it — into making “choices” that the White House considers desirable.
The 11 candidates for the 2016 Republican nomination who are currently leading in the polls gathered at the Air Force One Pavilion of the Ronald Reagan Presidential Library in Simi Valley, California, on September 16. They were there to take part in the second debate of the 2016 election campaign, an event hosted this time by CNN.
Ten years ago the Supreme Court ruled that "public use" included "economic development." Another Connecticut case might give them a chance to change their minds.
Although Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer took an oath to uphold the U.S. Constitution, he has made clear in his new book, The Court and the World: American Law and the New Global Realities, that he violated that oath by supporting the use of foreign law in American courts.
The ratio of representation prescribed by Article I of the Constitution is nearly universally ignored, to the detriment of the governed.